Seahawks GM knows you, hears you, feels you...

warden

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 6, 2010
Messages
3,049
Reaction score
1,438
As of today, the Seahawks are the number one cheapest offensive line in the league.
 

NoGain

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 28, 2022
Messages
3,161
Reaction score
3,302
A combination of FA, draft and trading are all avenues needed to build or maintain a roster.

If we are talking about the IOL contracts given out so far, imo none of them have been way over the top. Even the 5 years on fries is just a 2 year obligation albeit quite a bit of guaranteed for those 2 years - 7th most guaranteed to a guard currently.
Aaron Banks was overpaid imo but none of these contracts should hurt a franchise.

Here is what the teams are obligated to in years and guaranteed money for the top FA IOL this offseason:

Drew Dalman 2yr / $28M
Will Fries 2yr / $44M
Aaron Banks 1yr / $27M
James Daniels 1yr / $10.7M
Kevin Zeitler 1yr / $8.75M
Mekhi Becton (2yr / $20M total, no details yet)


Daniels, Becton and Zeitler were very good deals imo. I imagine Jenkins will only command a similar deal. OC Dalman was a good deal also.
Yeah, I posted something along these lines a couple of days ago. Given the cash cow the NFL is now, the rising CAP and salaries, it wasn't like these teams were going way over the top for these OLmen given the reality of it all. We're just not willing, for whatever the reason, to pay up to fix the glaring problem of our OLine.
 

Fernie Hawks Fan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
430
Reaction score
375
Location
Fernie, B.C. Canada
You think the current team can win more than 10 games? That is bold given the other teams in the NFC will improve with the draft too not just the Seahawks.
I was not asking about the draft, of course other teams will (should) improve with the draft. I specifically asked if just the improvement in coaching and with more time to play together would make any difference in the W column.
 

NoGain

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 28, 2022
Messages
3,161
Reaction score
3,302
Would anybody be surprised if the Raiders picked Jeanty at #6? That would seem so PC.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
13,384
Reaction score
9,109
Location
SoCal Desert
As of today, the Seahawks are the number one cheapest offensive line in the league.
the greatness of our famous Schneider Line cannot be measured by merely salary cap. The Schneider line is much loved by coaches around the league for the past decade or so, now, that is respect!
 
Last edited:

Rat

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
11,371
Reaction score
6,502
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
Would anybody be surprised if the Raiders picked Jeanty at #6? That would seem so PC.
He's not the GM, but regardless, Pete likes his second round RBs. The only time he took one in the first here, he traded down from 18 to 27.
 

Scout

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 30, 2021
Messages
1,988
Reaction score
2,349
I can't imagine they're going to offer something that would actually be worth it to us.

Wouldn't shock me to see this organization sell low though.
They better not because that would be wild....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rat

Scout

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 30, 2021
Messages
1,988
Reaction score
2,349
Would anybody be surprised if the Raiders picked Jeanty at #6? That would seem so PC.
It would be a good selection if they feel good about other areas of the team and the do intend on signing more free agents post draft.

I personally think it is a luxury pick for the Raiders but they are more likely to draft a trench player or WR at their first pick.
 

Seahawker

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
4,052
Reaction score
1,910
As of today, the Seahawks are the number one cheapest offensive line in the league.

Seahawks OL spending

2020- 26.6M (26th)
2021- 26.9M (22nd)
2022- 23.5M (28th)
2023- 20.5M (30th)
2024- 21.1M (32nd)

18 individual offensive linemen are set to have higher cap hits in 2025 than the entire Seahawks starting unit.
*Read that again*

This OL spending has a direct correlation to our OL performance/ranking.
I am not saying we should have absolutely spent FA money on OL if the fit wasn't there or a deal couldn't be swung.
But what I am saying is at this point we need to use 3 of our top 5 picks on OL. There are IOL questions, there are ? At OT & contracts coming up, there is no strong hold at center. The aforementioned coupled with the fact we have ranked near league worst dictates multiple picks go to OL. Part of this reasoning is.
1) This has been let go for too long, action must be taken. Too much riding on it at this point.
2) There is no other position in such disrepair & urgent need to use draft picks for anything over OL.
3) If we use 3 top picks, maybe one or two will be notable upgrades and move the needle up for this offensive line.
4) This is the draft to do it, a strong OL class with a few versatile players with potential talent to stick in this league, but most will be gone before day 3 starts.
5) Spend the draft resource now and the offense will be that much further ahead towards a turn a round. Also will have insurance towards OT contracts coming up and ultimately save a bunch of cap $ we can spend towards vital contract extentions in 26' throughout the roster.
6) Drafting three OL will add talent & competition resulting in ++ help for Darnold, our WR group, the run-game and less minutes for our defense.
7) I basically wrote this because I know JS won't do it and I like to be right.
 

GemCity

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
3,656
Reaction score
4,294
I figured it out. JS is going to looks like a genius and we will all be worshipping him.

That’s right folks, the NFL is transitioning to 7 v 7.

Boom biyatches.
 

AnimeAmore

Well-known member
Joined
May 15, 2023
Messages
197
Reaction score
270
Seahawks OL spending

2020- 26.6M (26th)
2021- 26.9M (22nd)
2022- 23.5M (28th)
2023- 20.5M (30th)
2024- 21.1M (32nd)

18 individual offensive linemen are set to have higher cap hits in 2025 than the entire Seahawks starting unit.
*Read that again*

This OL spending has a direct correlation to our OL performance/ranking.
I am not saying we should have absolutely spent FA money on OL if the fit wasn't there or a deal couldn't be swung.
But what I am saying is at this point we need to use 3 of our top 5 picks on OL. There are IOL questions, there are ? At OT & contracts coming up, there is no strong hold at center. The aforementioned coupled with the fact we have ranked near league worst dictates multiple picks go to OL. Part of this reasoning is.
1) This has been let go for too long, action must be taken. Too much riding on it at this point.
2) There is no other position in such disrepair & urgent need to use draft picks for anything over OL.
3) If we use 3 top picks, maybe one or two will be notable upgrades and move the needle up for this offensive line.
4) This is the draft to do it, a strong OL class with a few versatile players with potential talent to stick in this league, but most will be gone before day 3 starts.
5) Spend the draft resource now and the offense will be that much further ahead towards a turn a round. Also will have insurance towards OT contracts coming up and ultimately save a bunch of cap $ we can spend towards vital contract extentions in 26' throughout the roster.
6) Drafting three OL will add talent & competition resulting in ++ help for Darnold, our WR group, the run-game and less minutes for our defense.
7) I basically wrote this because I know JS won't do it and I like to be right.
I think you're being too conservative going with only 3. I'd say 4 out of our first 5 picks now must be OL. We need a minimum of 2 rookies being able to start right away *and* be an upgrade.
 

Latest posts

Top