Drew Lock starting for the Giants

xgeoff

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
2,137
Reaction score
327
And has thrown a pick six 😂

Honestly I liked Drew when he was here and, similar to how I feel about Sam Howell, I feel he can be good in the right situation.

That being said, Geno is better than both right now. I think Drew could have been our qb of the future if he stayed, I think Sam has a lot of potential. There are tons of QB’s (Darnold for example) that need time and the right situation to be successful.
 
OP
OP
xgeoff

xgeoff

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
2,137
Reaction score
327
Drew lock with second pick six 🤦🏻‍♂️
 

SonicHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
12,803
Reaction score
4,817
Damn poor Drew having to prove himself with that terrible team.
 

SonicHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
12,803
Reaction score
4,817
I didn't think Lock was worth a damn but I still have a soft spot for any Seahawks QB.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
13,384
Reaction score
9,109
Location
SoCal Desert
From dot net: Drew Lock and Sam Howell need more touches, and they will be the next Darnold or Mayfield. The Hawks kept wasting opportunities by not signing Darnold and Mayfield, allowing Lock to join the Giants instead of GeNO, again, not starting Howell who just needs more touches to be the next Darnold or Mayfield.
 
Last edited:

Rat

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
11,368
Reaction score
6,497
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
He's on an awful team, so I have some sympathy in that regard, but damn, he's sure not elevating himself above his situation.

I thought he was a smart signing by them, and I also, apparently erroneously, thought Howell was a sage pickup for us. Maybe neither Schneider nor I have a good eye for backup QBs. Schneider has been fortunate that he has had durable starters so it hasn't bit him often, but he really needs to re-evaluate the kind of backup QB he looks for. Maybe we should be employing the kind who has led his team to victory before, even if their best days are past, rather than using the roster slot as a development thing.
 

SonicHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
12,803
Reaction score
4,817
There are fewer than 30 QBs who are good. Finding a backup that is 'next man up' is nearly impossible.
 

SonicHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
12,803
Reaction score
4,817
Nobody here saw Darnold's revival coming. I am straight up calling BS on anyone who claims they did.
Yeah, absolutely no way. Also, Darnold is still pretty trash. He's going to absolutely steal money from someone next year.
 

Rat

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
11,368
Reaction score
6,497
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
There are fewer than 30 QBs who are good. Finding a backup that is 'next man up' is nearly impossible.
I get that, but there are Andy Dalton types available every year. I'm just wondering if we should be targeting those rather than high-upside development types who havn't shown they can lead a team to anything. I guess you're screwed either way if the QB goes down for the year, but I think there should be some reflecting on whether we'd be better off with someone who isn't going to come into a game and look as completely lost as Howell did last week. To be fair, Lock did fill in competently when he had to make a start last season. I think it's something for the front office to think about in the offseason.
 

SonicHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
12,803
Reaction score
4,817
I get that, but there are Andy Dalton types available every year. I'm just wondering if we should be targeting those rather than high-upside development types who havn't shown they can lead a team to anything. I guess you're screwed either way if the QB goes down for the year, but I think there should be some reflecting on whether we'd be better off with someone who isn't going to come into a game and look as completely lost as Howell did last week. To be fair, Lock did fill in competently when he had to make a start last season. I think it's something for the front office to think about in the offseason.
It's a tough question, but I don't think the backup is usually seen as much as a developmental guy and just a guy you can insert.
 
OP
OP
xgeoff

xgeoff

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Messages
2,137
Reaction score
327
Yeah, absolutely no way. Also, Darnold is still pretty trash. He's going to absolutely steal money from someone next year.
Perfectly good enough to carve up the Seahawks D. Good enough to go 12-2 so far. How much better does he have to be?
Think about this: the ravens won a Super Bowl with Trent Dilfer. He’s not elite, I grant you that. But what else does this Vikings team need?
 

SonicHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
12,803
Reaction score
4,817
Perfectly good enough to carve up the Seahawks D. Good enough to go 12-2 so far. How much better does he have to be?
Think about this: the ravens won a Super Bowl with Trent Dilfer. He’s not elite, I grant you that. But what else does this Vikings team need?
It’s a good vikings team.
 

Latest posts

Top