Geno Smith the headcase

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
5,008
Reaction score
9,107
Location
Cockeysville, Md
And also is a winning record good enough? Like the M’s have a winning record and I’m sick of them. I want more than a winning record. I think geno is good enough and if we surrounded him with good line play and running game and defense we could win a superbowl but so did Trent dilfer and nick foles
No. A winning record isntbgiid enough. But when the pieces around the qb shoukd yield a bottom 5 record and you manage better than .500 that SHOULD point to the qb being pretty good.

Here, its HIS fault they are 9-8 or HIS fault they should be better

Not the o lines fault the defenses fault and the rushing games fault for being bad... all at the same time... all elements BTW rhat the qb needs to succeed.



Here is one of the better examples of film review that look THROUGH the stats at the context that created them.

Murph also pretty well sums up the attitude many Geno critics have when trying to make the argument that the dude is just average or a bridge...

But the critics will look at an actual review like this one or Matty Brown's and say 'i dont care what they say... my eyes see what they see...'
 

Sperrydogg

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2023
Messages
2,917
Reaction score
1,852
Location
Port Angeles Washington in the mountains
Here's the list of most pressured QBs


All of the QBs you mentioned are in the bottom of the league in terms of pressure. Of bonafied starters in the league, only Rodgers and Cousins have it harder than Geno.

But now look at the defenses of those players you mentioned and their rushing games.

The thing with Seattle the last few years is that its been a recipe for utter failure - no defense. No running game. No protection. And that isnt an exaggeration. You might have a line thats bad, but then you dont have a defense that also doesnt stop the opposition at all. Or a run game that is bottom 3. There are example of teams who rank low on 2 of the 3 areas, but not all 4 where they have found any success or had a qb make more of that situation than Geno. That just is what it is.

Being literally futile three factors almost ALWAYS lead to a top 5 draft pick the following year or top 10, regardless of QB. Because at that point it doesnt matter how good your wrs are because they wont be getting the ball either because your qb is sacked or because your defense isnt getting you the ball back.

Yet, we managed a winning record. Why?

Because our qb is a good bit better than average.
I think Matthew Stanford should be talked about in this conversation too, and we just watched him play recently, we pressured the crap out of him but didn’t sack him, cause he moves, he rolls out, he avoids the sack with reading and rolling, something I am begging to see geno do more of. And that leads to some of my questioning of him cause he’s been sacked 32 time and still doesn’t move, like he doesn’t help himself and thinks he can stand tall in the pocket when he can’t, stafford didn’t wait for the pocket to start collapsing he moved, that might be play calling or it might be IQ, but standing there knowing what’s coming and not adjusting is unacceptable and could have something to do with why he has 32 sacks. Also for all the real QBs on that list with lots of yards Geno’s td% is terrible…. 2.9% of his throws go for tds, and obviously that’s tied with his 2.9% of throws go for interceptions
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
5,008
Reaction score
9,107
Location
Cockeysville, Md
And also is a winning record good enough? Like the M’s have a winning record and I’m sick of them. I want more than a winning record. I think geno is good enough and if we surrounded him with good line play and running game and defense we could win a superbowl but so did Trent dilfer and nick foles

Here is a simple exercise.

Look at this list:


And this one


And then this one


And explain to me how an average qb appears at the top of all of them.

Answer he doesnt. Geno is among the most accurate in the league despite being the 3rd most pressured of regular starters this year.

And the adjusted completion rate takes out drops.

Since 2021, Geno is an elite passer in terms of accuracy.

How is there an argument that hes a bridge when he has been among the most pressured qbs, with among the worst rushing attacks and defenses and is still elite in terms of accuracy?

Thats not opinion. Those are facts.

Would love to have @Ozzy, @pittpnthrs and @SoulfishHawk explain how a 15 to 18 qb does that or what other sub 15 qb does it... or sub 13.

But the defense will invariably swing to referencing how other qbs also have it hard and tbrow more TDs or have a better record.

The convo never stays on the facts of the specific situation in seattle.
 

Sperrydogg

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2023
Messages
2,917
Reaction score
1,852
Location
Port Angeles Washington in the mountains
No. A winning record isntbgiid enough. But when the pieces around the qb shoukd yield a bottom 5 record and you manage better than .500 that SHOULD point to the qb being pretty good.

Here, its HIS fault they are 9-8 or HIS fault they should be better

Not the o lines fault the defenses fault and the rushing games fault for being bad... all at the same time... all elements BTW rhat the qb needs to succeed.



Here is one of the better examples of film review that look THROUGH the stats at the context that created them.

Murph also pretty well sums up the attitude many Geno critics have when trying to make the argument that the dude is just average or a bridge...

But the critics will look at an actual review like this one or Matty Brown's and say 'i dont care what they say... my eyes see what they see...'

I guess the real debate should be is geno elite. It’s not fair to say he is not better than average. Geno is a good starter but he is not the kind of starter who raises the whole team up and wins despite all of the teams flaws, but what qb is. Mahomes could probably do better than geno, Lamar probably, there’s a few out there. But I guess that just means you’re right, Geno is a really good qb and we should probably appreciate him more…. I’m trying…. Nightnight lol
 

Sperrydogg

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2023
Messages
2,917
Reaction score
1,852
Location
Port Angeles Washington in the mountains
Here is a simple exercise.

Look at this list:


And this one


And then this one


And explain to me how an average qb appears at the top of all of them.

Answer he doesnt. Geno is among the most accurate in the league despite being the 3rd most pressured of regular starters this year.

And the adjusted completion rate takes out drops.

Since 2021, Geno is an elite passer in terms of accuracy.

How is there an argument that hes a bridge when he has been among the most pressured qbs, with among the worst rushing attacks and defenses and is still elite in terms of accuracy?

Thats not opinion. Those are facts.
Again accuracy and percentage only mean so much. Even the list you showed about pressures has one telling number to me td% 2.9….
On the third list most of the top QBs are average, and qb accuracy and even yards don’t necessarily result in wins. Tough argument cause if the hawks had a good line and run game and defense then it would be “see geno couldn’t get it done without help all around him” so I guess it’s more of just a popularity contest like everything else in life turns in to
 
Last edited:

Sperrydogg

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2023
Messages
2,917
Reaction score
1,852
Location
Port Angeles Washington in the mountains
Here is a simple exercise.

Look at this list:


And this one


And then this one


And explain to me how an average qb appears at the top of all of them.

Answer he doesnt. Geno is among the most accurate in the league despite being the 3rd most pressured of regular starters this year.

And the adjusted completion rate takes out drops.

Since 2021, Geno is an elite passer in terms of accuracy.

How is there an argument that hes a bridge when he has been among the most pressured qbs, with among the worst rushing attacks and defenses and is still elite in terms of accuracy?

Thats not opinion. Those are facts.

Would love to have @Ozzy, @pittpnthrs and @SoulfishHawk explain how a 15 to 18 qb does that or what other sub 15 qb does it... or sub 13.

But the defense will invariably swing to referencing how other qbs also have it hard and tbrow more TDs or have a better record.

The convo never stays on the facts of the specific situation in seattle.
The top guy on each list is average
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
5,008
Reaction score
9,107
Location
Cockeysville, Md
I guess the real debate should be is geno elite. It’s not fair to say he is not better than average. Geno is a good starter but he is not the kind of starter who raises the whole team up and wins despite all of the teams flaws, but what qb is. Mahomes could probably do better than geno, Lamar probably, there’s a few out there. But I guess that just means you’re right, Geno is a really good qb and we should probably appreciate him more…. I’m trying…. Nightnight lol

Why does have to be debated? Who cares if he is a top 5 qb. My frustration is the insistance that he is somewhere around 18.
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
5,008
Reaction score
9,107
Location
Cockeysville, Md
The top guy on each list is average


Here's the last 3 years .

Tua was just signed to a 'not average' contract. So i guess if you want to define him as average, you can.

But Tua being elite in terms of accuracy means far less than Geno being near the top, considering he has one of thr best playcallers in the game building an offense around him.

Point is no one else on the accuracy or adjusted completion list ALSO has among the worst protection and run support.

If you are an average player and have a solid o line, solid run support, a good coordinator and a defense that gives you opportunities, your accuracy can look good.

Your accuracy does not improve if you dont have those things.

And if you have a high INT rate, and are extremely accurate, and rated high on deep passes, getting the ball out, then that data might have an explanation (in part) attributable to something other than qb ability.

Likewise, if the qb is top 10 in accuracy metrics, time to throw, performance under pressure, and set the record for comebacks, there may also be an alternate explanation for why his TDs are low, like the fact that the team was close to tops in the league in rushing Tds. Whixh seattle was / is. So the fact that Walker had a boat load of TDs and Geno not as much - does that mean Geno is doing proportionately less than Walker or not contributing to scoring? No. It only means that the QB carries the team to within the 5, 10 or 15, and then the OC calls a running play that scores. NOT that the QB isnt contributing to scoring.

Those are simple facts that are easily observable and frrquently dicounted in favor of a stat line that supports a supposed narrative that Geno isnt doing enough to get us wins.

Which is simikar to ignoring facts like him throwing 2 TDs in a game that were takem off the board and INts that happened that werent his fault.

But it doesnt help the argument that he's 15th to 19th if you acknowledge those truths.

Its easy to substantiate the belief that he is 15 to 18 if you choose to simply point to the numbers and say ' look - he's a 50/50 td to int qb and thats not good enough'

Murph breaks down the film against the Rams play by play focusing on the factors that led to Geno's INTs and comes to the same conclusion... based on film.

In that same game if you watch the highlights of what Geno did to actually tie the game and put us in position to win it... that qb play ... define it hiw you want... the throws, the poise, the accuracy the grit. Its tops. But we lost because we couldnt convert a 4th and inches.

We win that game and the narrative is how clutch Geno was in bringing us back depsite the mistakes... you know, like Goff did after throwing 5tds. But our run game is garbage and the coaching decisions questionable, so it all just Geno screwing up.
 

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
6,320
Reaction score
3,201
Currently

Well, Mahomes for sure. As for the rest=
Lamar - Not the best passer, but working on his 3rd MVP
Burrow
Allen
Stroud - bit early, but he's on the path
Daniels - way to early, but the guy has a cannon and is a helluva player

Maybe's - I can't decide if these two are great or not
Goff
Love
 

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
6,320
Reaction score
3,201
Pitt
I dont even know what to say in response. Its impossible to debate a thing when literally claim i said something i didnt. I NEVER said Geno was superior to Burrow. What i said was that if Burrow were in Seattle putting up the exact same numbers as Geno, the folks claiming Geno isnt great would be giving Burrow a pass.

Clear?

I also pointed to the FACT that last year, with a slightly better supporting cast, Burrow finished lower than Geno. That isnt me claiming anything. Its me citing what happened.

Fair and your right. I'll give it to you that Geno has surpassed my expectations and has played massively better than I thought he would.
 

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
6,320
Reaction score
3,201
Here is a simple exercise.

Look at this list:


And this one


And then this one


And explain to me how an average qb appears at the top of all of them.

Answer he doesnt. Geno is among the most accurate in the league despite being the 3rd most pressured of regular starters this year.

And the adjusted completion rate takes out drops.

Since 2021, Geno is an elite passer in terms of accuracy.

How is there an argument that hes a bridge when he has been among the most pressured qbs, with among the worst rushing attacks and defenses and is still elite in terms of accuracy?

Thats not opinion. Those are facts.

Would love to have @Ozzy, @pittpnthrs and @SoulfishHawk explain how a 15 to 18 qb does that or what other sub 15 qb does it... or sub 13.

But the defense will invariably swing to referencing how other qbs also have it hard and tbrow more TDs or have a better record.

The convo never stays on the facts of the specific situation in seattle.

Now see Keas, we were on a good path and you brought me back in. Lol

I'll tell you how he drops to the 15-18 range with those accuracy numbers. It's everything else. It's great that he can hit targets like he does. I'm sure he'd be hell on wheels in a QB competition where accuracy is the measure. Unfortunately there's other things to consider like decision making, TD percentage, TD/INT ratio, redzone efficiency, yards per attempt, etc,,,. There's a lot to factor in.
 

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
6,320
Reaction score
3,201
This has gone on long enough. If it's the 15-18 ranking that's making people sore,,,,fine. I'll admit that there's reason to accept him in the top 10 area. He's been good. Can't deny that. Has he been great,,,,,,well,,,,,
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
5,008
Reaction score
9,107
Location
Cockeysville, Md
Now see Keas, we were on a good path and you brought me back in. Lol

I'll tell you how he drops to the 15-18 range with those accuracy numbers. It's everything else. It's great that he can hit targets like he does. I'm sure he'd be hell on wheels in a QB competition where accuracy is the measure. Unfortunately there's other things to consider like decision making, TD percentage, TD/INT ratio, redzone efficiency, yards per attempt, etc,,,. There's a lot to factor in.
Bud, his decision making is known. Look back at mumtiole ganes this year. Grubb has even attested to it.

I touched on the TDs. The fact that we lead the league through the first qtr of the season on rishing tds explains a lot of it. It was pointed out during a broadcast that it was th irony of thr offense - poor rushing attack but as many TDs on the ground as anyone else.

So i ask you, does the fact that we are 9th best in rishing TDs remotely equate to the actual effectiveness of our ground game? No.
Why? Because it was the pass game that got us to within the 5 or 10 yard line and THEN we decided to throw the ball. Our run game was ineffective. He dont have as many passing Tds because Geno cant. There is no evidence of that. We dont have them because we have chosen to run them a good bit... and because we have committed self inflicted errors on scoring plays and drove extending plays at a rate that was tops in the league. And hiw many of thise penalties were on Geno? None.

So you cant ignore the reality that we have chisen to run TDs after our passing offense got us in scoring position and that we have had quite a few TDs and scoring opportu ities taken off the board because of mental lapses on the part of 'others'.

There were 2 Tds against the 9ers in the first game that werent. Not Geno's fault.

There have been INts that had zero to do with Geno.

Im happy to break down every single one so that YOU can decide which ones were a result of him making a poor decision. But thats already been done by others on youtube who have pointed out the issue isnt Geno.

So again, you cant stand on raw numbers like TDs and ints and then say 'see, look how bad they are' and ignore what actually happened.

Well you can, it's just not an honest debate.

Just like you cant say the dude drops to below average because he makes poor decisions when the evidence exist that he makes great decisions by virtue of his accuracy, completion percentage and testimony of his coaches.

And you and others have acknowledged that one of the best things about our current regime is that Mac pulls no pinches. He's a straight shooter and had shown that he will call you out, and even pull you, if you arent doing your job. Both Grubb and Mac have praised Geno even after games where he threw .ore than one pick as making great decisions, playing 'lights out' and have pointed out the team has to support him better. Grubb has said Geno is as good as it gets when they protect him and stats show he's as accurate as it gets when they dont.

So where is the evidence of the poor decision making?

Does he do dumb stuff? Yeah. Unnecessary 'in the pocket' sacks because he is backpedaling rather than tossing the ball away or scrambling outside the pocket.

But stuff like that pales in comparison to thr level in which the dude is operating this offense.

And I guarantee that as the offense gets better around him, he will be better as well.

And then we will be talking not about whether he's top 10, but if he's top 5 to 7. Because there is nothing in his game that would lead anyone to beleive that if he can play as well as he has with little help, that he can't play significantly better with more.
 

pittpnthrs

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
6,320
Reaction score
3,201
Bud, his decision making is known. Look back at mumtiole ganes this year. Grubb has even attested to it.

I touched on the TDs. The fact that we lead the league through the first qtr of the season on rishing tds explains a lot of it. It was pointed out during a broadcast that it was th irony of thr offense - poor rushing attack but as many TDs on the ground as anyone else.

So i ask you, does the fact that we are 9th best in rishing TDs remotely equate to the actual effectiveness of our ground game? No.
Why? Because it was the pass game that got us to within the 5 or 10 yard line and THEN we decided to throw the ball. Our run game was ineffective. He dont have as many passing Tds because Geno cant. There is no evidence of that. We dont have them because we have chosen to run them a good bit... and because we have committed self inflicted errors on scoring plays and drove extending plays at a rate that was tops in the league. And hiw many of thise penalties were on Geno? None.

So you cant ignore the reality that we have chisen to run TDs after our passing offense got us in scoring position and that we have had quite a few TDs and scoring opportu ities taken off the board because of mental lapses on the part of 'others'.

There were 2 Tds against the 9ers in the first game that werent. Not Geno's fault.

There have been INts that had zero to do with Geno.

Im happy to break down every single one so that YOU can decide which ones were a result of him making a poor decision. But thats already been done by others on youtube who have pointed out the issue isnt Geno.

So again, you cant stand on raw numbers like TDs and ints and then say 'see, look how bad they are' and ignore what actually happened.

Well you can, it's just not an honest debate.

Just like you cant say the dude drops to below average because he makes poor decisions when the evidence exist that he makes great decisions by virtue of his accuracy, completion percentage and testimony of his coaches.

And you and others have acknowledged that one of the best things about our current regime is that Mac pulls no pinches. He's a straight shooter and had shown that he will call you out, and even pull you, if you arent doing your job. Both Grubb and Mac have praised Geno even after games where he threw .ore than one pick as making great decisions, playing 'lights out' and have pointed out the team has to support him better. Grubb has said Geno is as good as it gets when they protect him and stats show he's as accurate as it gets when they dont.

So where is the evidence of the poor decision making?

Does he do dumb stuff? Yeah. Unnecessary 'in the pocket' sacks because he is backpedaling rather than tossing the ball away or scrambling outside the pocket.

But stuff like that pales in comparison to thr level in which the dude is operating this offense.

And I guarantee that as the offense gets better around him, he will be better as well.

And then we will be talking not about whether he's top 10, but if he's top 5 to 7. Because there is nothing in his game that would lead anyone to beleive that if he can play as well as he has with little help, that he can't play significantly better with more.

Keasely, you win man. I concede. Geno is faultless and any outlet saying otherwise doesn't know what they are talking about. If he's not ranked #1 or at least in the top 5, that's not on him. He just doesn't have any weaknesses. Heck, even the interceptions he throws aren't his fault.

You win. I lost. Seattle has the best QB in the league and best QB to ever take a snap on our team ever. We are so lucky to be alive to witness such greatness. I'm looking forward to all the Super Bowls and MVP's he's going to amass in the near future. Go Geno.
 

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
5,008
Reaction score
9,107
Location
Cockeysville, Md
Keasely, you win man. I concede. Geno is faultless and any outlet saying otherwise doesn't know what they are talking about. If he's not ranked #1 or at least in the top 5, that's not on him. He just doesn't have any weaknesses. Heck, even the interceptions he throws aren't his fault.

You win. I lost. Seattle has the best QB in the league and best QB to ever take a snap on our team ever. We are so lucky to be alive to witness such greatness. I'm looking forward to all the Super Bowls and MVP's he's going to amass in the near future. Go Geno.
Not 1, not 5, not even 10 at the moment.

Just not 15 or 18.

Or incapable because he doesn't have 20 TDs.

Or a bad decision maker because he has 11 Ints.

Or just acknowledging the dude has been give a crap performing group in key areas and had outperformed what one might reasonably expect.

Not elite. Not top 5. Just the above.
 

Ozzy

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
11,647
Reaction score
6,495
Pitt
I dont even know what to say in response. Its impossible to debate a thing when literally claim i said something i didnt. I NEVER said Geno was superior to Burrow. What i said was that if Burrow were in Seattle putting up the exact same numbers as Geno, the folks claiming Geno isnt great would be giving Burrow a pass.

Clear?

I also pointed to the FACT that last year, with a slightly better supporting cast, Burrow finished lower than Geno. That isnt me claiming anything. Its me citing what happened.



Ozzy. You are doing it again.

Find ANY example of a QB with the TRIFECTA of bad pieces that Geno has had who has put up better numbers.

Post it.

Otherwise you are just claiming something that doesnt exist.

And Burrow this year - his line is rated around 13th best.

Burrow also has Jamar Chase.

We have DK Metcalf, who has an article written about him and how bad his drops and turnovers are and how they have taken TDs off the board and killed momentum in games this year that we coukd have won.

And therein lies the rub.

You and other flatly ignore the offer to actually debate fact, like finding the QB who has ranked better than Geno with an equally bad supporting cast in 3 aspects of his team. Then you go on and say pattently FALSE things like how Russ and others have done more with less. That in the face of @Maelstrom787 pointing soecifically to that argument months ago and showing that Russ NEVER had to play with a 28th ranked line, 30th ranked defense, and 29th ranked rushing attack at the same time. Its simply false. It has NEVER happened. And thats not cherry picking stats. Its stating obviously that its one thing to 'light it up' regardless of yiur running game being there as Russ did in 17. But he also had a D ranked in the top half of the league. NOT next to last. Do you honestly believe anyone is talking about how incredible that season was for him if our defense never gave him achance to be on the field and let the opposition dominate us every game?

No.

And Russ has shown what he can do when forced to actually play in a pro, NFL offense and NOT run the scramble drill all game. Just look at the offense he runs now and how entirely truncated it is. But you will likely focus on on his TD to INt numbers as valudation of your position and the Steelers record and claim proof of your argument, while ignoring the fact the dude posted completion percentages in the 50s for half his starts and had a qbr of 14 in one... all while running an offense with a killer defense, run game and better protection than ours.

And you dont have to listen to my 'comparisons'. Folks whos job it is to assess film have stated flatly that a guy like Jared Goff who is easily 1 or 2 on the MVP conversation woul likely play worse than Geno if he were in Seattle with the flaws we have.

You just seem to point to things like TD to Int and again, ignore 2Tds pulled off the board in a single game, and an int that shouldnt have happened, when none of that was the qbs fault. Had those stood, the TDs are 13, ints 10. Thats ONE example on a team that league wide and in local and regional media has been the worst at beatung itself with self inflicted play.

You talk about the timeliness of Geno's mistakes and flatly ignore the back breaking timing of drops, penalties and boneheaded mistakes that led to turnovers by that supporting cast you choose to see as stellar when theres an article highlighting ganme by game the mistakes DK made that could havr altered the outcome of games.

But you go straight to how GREAT they are and just slide the result of their faliures to the QB.

Matty F Brown, who straight calls it like it is and basis his assessments on actually game tape and deep analysis has said pretty plainly that :

A: Very few of Geno's INTs have been a resukt of HIS poor play or poor decision making (depsite being one of the most lressured QBs in the league)

B: Geno's TD number are low but thats nit indicative of NOT being able to score because we were near league best in rishing TDs, depsite having a largeley innefective rushing attack? Simple analysis points to why- because Geno has repeatedly gotten us to the one yard linr or inside the 6 and we have just run it in from there.

So using TDs as an argument is again, cherry picking, because the guy who undoubtedly got us inside the 5 was Geno. You faulting him for Grubb choosing to run from there is blind stat farming for the sake of framing an argument.
I'm not doing anything. Defense has no bearing on a QB's stats, you're reaching with that. I can find multiple examples of QB's with a bad line and a bad running game putting up better numbers than 11 touchdowns and 11 picks. That should be obvious that it's not the standard in those situations. I'm not going to do the research for you. Its the argument you make all the time and you should do the research to make sure it backs up your point not me.

Very few of his interceptions are his fault? Are you serious? Many of them have been beyond bad throws. He also leads the league in interception worthy throws with 18 before last week so its even higher and the next highest was 14. You can't say everyone else is being biased when you say stuff like this.


Matty has been wildly wrong on many things over the years. Plus I think that's a bad faith argument anyway. When I said NFL execs whose job is to evaluate personnel have him ranked 20th and that's not good enough but a Twitter guy with 1200 followers is the expert we should trust? Yeah That's not good enough for me. I'm going to trust the guys running the actual teams internal scouting over a Seahawks twitter account.

Again I don't understand why you guys take this stuff so personal. I think Geno is in the 10-15 range which is actually quite a bit higher than the league views him as I already PROVED. You have a massive problem with my ranking so I can assume you have him near top 5 or else you wouldn't get so pissed at my take. We disagree, who cares?

This is why Maelstrom your claim that one side is picking on the other side is ridiculous. You guys need to get over me or anyone else ranking him 10-15 or even lower then that. It's not a personal shot at you or anyone else.
 

Ozzy

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
11,647
Reaction score
6,495
Now we're arguing Geno has bad weapons at the skill positions when his #3 receiver might be the most reliable #3 in the league, We have the first running back taken in his draft class and a special talent in Walker and DK/JSN are monsters. Add to that that almost none of his interceptions are his fault lol. I'm out on this one now.
 
Top