SoulfishHawk
Well-known member
I've been wanting them to add to the screen game for years. Seems like they just flat out don't like to do it. Yet, teams have been gashing the Hawks for years using the screen against out defense.
I think K-Mac might be that guy, but with both Walker & Charbonet dinged up right now, I don't know that Pete would want to use him like that; Maybe later when K-9 get's back up to snuff, they can maybe throw McIntosh in there for a change of pace.Tyler Lockett has proven his toughness by being a punt and kick returner in the early part of his career. But WR is the second-most injured position on offense after RB, and it makes no sense to invite contact when there aren't yards to be had. It's a very vulnerable position where you have strong safeties and linebackers running at you full speed after a catch.
At his age, I wouldn't be surprised if the coaches are telling him that he has to live to fight another day rather than try to get an extra yard or two. Lockett benefits us just by being on the field. If we lose him, even for a game or two, that's a big disadvantage for us. It's just smart football.
But yes, we need to scheme better to get our receivers in space where they have room to ramble after the catch. That's what Shanahan and McVay do best. And Andy Reid, too.
K-Mac has clutch hands so he could definitely play a role if Waldron wants to use a screen game to punish aggressive defenses (like opponents do to our aggressive defense). JSN's arrival also means guys like Dee Eskridge/Dareke Young (both flash athleticism in bunches) might carve out a role as hybrid WR/RB (not everyone can be like Deebo) on fly sweeps or even screens/quick hitches.I think K-Mac might be that guy, but with both Walker & Charbonet dinged up right now, I don't know that Pete would want to use him like that; Maybe later when K-9 get's back up to snuff, they can maybe throw McIntosh in there for a change of pace.
Lockett's Pass Catching acumen is one of his best abilities, but his 2nd best ability, is his avail-ability.
I think when you get down to semantics, and start choosing 'what part of the job isn't getting done' - and how acceptable that is - well I think we're splitting hairs.I hear ya and understand the point...but see it a bit differently. I think the WR position has a standard set of attributes (probably ~15-20) to evaluate on, with some of them being a higher priority or value and fall into tiers. Tier 1: Can Get Open (Seperation, Quickness, Awareness), Can Catch (Total Catches, Tough Catches, Total Drops), Total Yards, Game Awareness & Blocking.
For me, YAC falls into tier 2. Important, but if a player is good at all the tier 1 items, i'm not overly concerned on this. Everyone has strengths and weaknesses...YAC is not a TL strength. Clutch > YAC.
YPC is good for intermediate and deep routes.Does YAC really matter? Or is YPC more important? Would you rather a 1 yard catch with 10 yards after catch or a 15 yard catch with 0?
That's a nice article - but I think it ignores the cause of Tyler's problem.Did anyone say YAC is a useless statistic? I didn't see it.
I'm not a lover of PFF, but this is a great read on the subject: https://www.pff.com/news/nfl-pff-da...the-catch-determined-factors-before-the-catch
It mentions Tyler by name. But . . . a lot of YAC-based judgments are kind of an oversimplification.
Football is a dangerous sport.Let's look at it in a different way that Geno led the NFL in Deep Ball Passing...depending on starting field position if a pass has 40+ air yards your WR is already attracting tackle help from any deep posted safety...increasing the likelihood of either a contested catch or a quick tackle from close proximity from a trailing corner or an arriving deep safety.
The result then becomes a significant gain or even a touchdown. Catching a ball closer to the line of scrimmage as you break in your route (at the stem of the route) gives more opportunity for YAC if the WR eludes or breaks the tackle of the closest defender.
The QB can play a major role...has he looked away from his target before firing it in? Is the QB late in recognizing a WR breaking into space? Where is the pass dropping in for the called play?
Yes Tyler has recently seemed like a sliding QB on some plays...but is it something to quibble about for all the production he continues to yield? Tyler has been a clutch WR time and again and light builded WR especially ones who have suffered a major injury before are likely to avoid a solid hit after safely pulling the pass into their body.
Wasn't ranting - it was mostly comprehensibleSeems like kind of a strawman argument, considering I don't know any analyst or forum member who's said YAC doesn't matter.
But comparing a gigantic X split end receiver like DK who's not going to have a lot of YAC yards unless he runs away from defenders after the catch and a smaller shifty slot or Z receiver like Lockett is apples and oranges IMO.
But rant away my friend!
In your original post you said you've been taking heat about it. Who has been giving you heat?
Your frustration is evident by your characterization of Tyler as not feeling the need to compete...a bit harsh by your own style of posts so I see you wanting more. His fellow receivers rave about him being a role model ...he plays a key role in making our offense hum and clutch catches means Geno can execute at a high level of confidence. Shane's play calling utilizes the strengths of his WR group so plays designed for Tyler may not feature many YAC opportunities...there's something to be said for a WR who consistently is "there when you need him"...I doubt he's coasting out there...defenders can only wish. Does his coach Sanjay Lal see YAC as an important 3rd necessity of WR skill? ...49ers rely on YAC and feature it...our offense seems to do ok without it. I understand your points I just have a different take.That's a nice article - but I think it ignores the cause of Tyler's problem.
Sure, there's mitigating factors and situations that would either enhance a person's YAC or decrease it - that I have no argument with.
My argument is, that in this case: Tyler has openly said that he's not interested in YAC. Said that his high school coach told him that was OK.
So, it's an admitted lack of effort, not a situation(s) out of his control.
I've been wanting them to add to the screen game for years. Seems like they just flat out don't like to do it. Yet, teams have been gashing the Hawks for years using the screen against out defense.
HA! I do get it. I do.Wasn't ranting - it was mostly comprehensible
I've seen several here, including in this thread that say that YAC doesn't matter.
No problem - You know what? I'll shut the hell up about it now.
I get it - I seem to be the outlier. But it was still worth mentioning 5 or 6 times![]()