Gambling on a QB this draft

FrodosFinger

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2022
Messages
3,661
Reaction score
3,974
Well that's certainly been the pat answer Pete and John give us after they draft a player that wasn't suppose to go until later rounds with a higher pick.

Carpenter
McDowell
Collier
Pocic
Richardson
Ifedi
Penny


All drafted higher than projected cause they were "our kind of guy."

If this happens over the next two years? Brace yourself, cause these guys are gonna be fired and we'll be a 3-4 win team.
All of those guys listed signed a second contract. Heck even McDowell started some games for the Browns last year. Come up with a different argument because this one is silly and holds no water
 

Rat

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
12,887
Reaction score
9,016
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
All of those guys listed signed a second contract. Heck even McDowell started some games for the Browns last year. Come up with a different argument because this one is silly and holds no water
That's a pretty low standard for success. Zero of those players signed that second deal with us except for Penny's recent one-year deal. We didn't even bother to exercise a fifth-year option on any of the first rounders you mentioned.
 

FrodosFinger

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2022
Messages
3,661
Reaction score
3,974
That's a pretty low standard for success. Zero of those players signed that second deal with us except for Penny's recent one-year deal. We didn't even bother to exercise a fifth-year option on any of the first rounders you mentioned.
If he would've said Prosise, C-Mike or Joey Hunt I would've agreed. Collier can still prove effective in this new system
 

FrodosFinger

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2022
Messages
3,661
Reaction score
3,974
I just don't see anything long term at the quarterback position this draft good enough to gamble an early pick on. Need to stack the trenches with very large human beings
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbq

Chuckwow

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 5, 2022
Messages
386
Reaction score
397
I have my doubts about DLock being any kind of long-term solution at QB.

If this 2022's QBs aren't fairly sure things, then it's hard to justify using any pick in what I've heard over and over is a deep draft at several important positions. I'd rather use 2nd, 3rd and 4th round picks to strengthen weak areas and provide some depth at others.

I'm with you all who say just roll ("rock" on, toffee) with Lock this year and level up on QB later.
I 100% agree with this, Ad Hawk. We are not contenders so we don't need to rush out and make yet another blockbuster QB trade and we surely don't need to reach on a QB. We absolutely cannot afford to screw this up. I won't go too much into what I want to see happen here because it involves yet another trade that Pete swears he will not consider (which means he's considering it) but yeah...let's get us an LT and let's add to the D this year.

Hopefully the trade I hint at above will happen and if it does, we should turn those picks into a couple 1sts next year to go with the probably nice 1sts we'll already own. I personally want Bryce Young (as of now) but there are probably several right QB answers in next year's draft. Not so much in this one. If this is done right, it's plausible we can have our pick of the bunch.

Edited due to furthered education: For some reason I thought Young was 6'1" . I now learn he is 5'11"...which means he could be 5' 10". He's very dynamic and probably the best QB in next year's class... but I'm now no longer all in on him. We'll see.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Ad Hawk

Ad Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
3,576
Reaction score
866
Would taking Ridder in the lower 1st/early 2nd rd (should he be available) be a worthy gamble for such a high pick for the Hawks?
 

RiverDog

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
7,061
Reaction score
4,986
Location
Kennewick, WA
Would taking Ridder in the lower 1st/early 2nd rd (should he be available) be a worthy gamble for such a high pick for the Hawks?
I'm perfectly content to sit where we're at and take the BPA with our first 3 picks. If Ridder were to fall to us at #40, I could be talked into taking a gamble on him, but I don't want to burn any draft capital moving up to get him or any other QB in this class.
 

Seahawker

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
4,787
Reaction score
3,250
I just don't see anything long term at the quarterback position this draft good enough to gamble an early pick on. Need to stack the trenches with very large human beings
I would like to see Pete & John step back from their 'dilute & reach' trade down style and find some real talent for the offensive line and defense. IMHO, they haven't utilized their draft capital very well in the last several years and this draft should be about team building. It would serve them better to wait for the 23' class of QB's. Of course though, Having said that... they probably will draft a QB, RB & WR with their first three picks.:cautious:
 

Own The West

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
1,107
Reaction score
569
I don't think QB is a priority for this team tbh. Whoever we roll out is going to be compared (unfavorably) to Russell and that's an extra burden on a presumed rookie that's going to have a tough learning curve already. Better to run with Lock -- who has the talent of a 2022 1st rounder -- and fans' low expectations for him. If he can't make the jump, he'll be the baseline for our 2023 draft pick/FA.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
14,459
Reaction score
2,984
For the post Russell Wilson era, I think they go back to square one. Whatever alleged tension that might have developed between player and staff over the last couple of years is now gone.

Both the quarterback coach and offensive coordinator should have a more noticeable influence over what transpires on the field for 2022. Looking beyond Geno Smith, they'll settle on a developmental fit. That developmental prospect will not suffer from any urgent do or die pressure ..... to start right away.

I'm gonna kick back and enjoy.
 

Own The West

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
1,107
Reaction score
569
I see people beating the "PCJS can't draft" drum again. Please keep in mind that we have been extremely unlucky with every top pick except Okung and Brooks getting injured before week 1.

Hard to build a team when your stud athletes keep starting their careers in rehab. Instead of calling for PCJS' heads, you should be after their strength and conditioning coaches...
 
Top