Do you consider 1 championship with Wilson a disappointment?

Cyrus12

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
17,615
Reaction score
4,973
Location
North of the Wall
Hes only one piece to a puzzle needed to win it all but given he was the best seahawk qb of all time do you consider only one championship a disappointment? We all know it should have been 2 but after that they didn't even get close...
 

JustTheTip

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 3, 2010
Messages
8,070
Reaction score
2,154
Location
On a spreadsheet
oldhawkfan":25gt0n5d said:
No. I’ll be forever grateful for that Championship!

You can both be grateful for that championship and disappointed with how the rest of his tenure here was handled.
 

jammerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
10,214
Reaction score
1,814
Nope!

However, it would have been 2 if they'd given the ball to Lynch in SB 49 to close it out.
 

Elemas

New member
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
1,369
Reaction score
7
Yes. Russ threw it but Pete called it.

Grateful but, overall characterized as a disappointment.
 

TwistedHusky

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
6,916
Reaction score
1,107
I consider only making 2 NFC conference games almost 10 years with an Elite QB the bigger disappointment.

But we probably should have won another SB or at least made another one.
 

John63

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2018
Messages
6,651
Reaction score
149
TwistedHusky":32oeh9hs said:
I consider only making 2 NFC conference games almost 10 years with an Elite QB the bigger disappointment.

But we probably should have won another SB or at least made another one.


should have in 2012 but we could not hold the lead with only 20 seconds to go.
 

nwHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
3,855
Reaction score
1,266
True, but that ball had to be thrown low not cheats high where the CB can break on it. All around stupid. But if thrown low, it’s Lockette or incomplete.
 

Shanegotyou11

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
5,374
Reaction score
382
Im bummed as i thought we would have 2 titles. However glad we had one. I thought they would run it back.
 

John63

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2018
Messages
6,651
Reaction score
149
nwHawk":voxt3x6e said:
True, but that ball had to be thrown low not cheats high where the CB can break on it. All around stupid. But if thrown low, it’s Lockette or incomplete.

The ball had to be thrown to a spot which it was, the issue was 1.. the WR did not get there. 2. they knew the play. 3.no not low, your throwing over the middle about 3 yards, you throw low it gets tipped. FYI you cannot say for a fact if he throws it low it's Lockett or incomplete. Lockett never even made it to the spot, so low or not interception. The play should never have been called. you don't put your QB into a timing must-throw pattern when he is as mobile as Wilson. Also if you watched Lockett he was not expecting it low. nor have we thrown it low when we ran the play before. IT is a timing pattern meant to thrown in the chest. The problem was our WR never got there. Not to mention the 2 score lead the LOFB gave up in under 9 minutes.

Also, I am very sure when Hass through his INT in we ant the ball and are going to win the game you said it was the Wr. Well, guess what after the ball being stupid the next issue was WR, and then the supposed nudge on the CB that never happened because Browner knew the play and was bigger than Kearse.
 

Sports Hernia

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
44,755
Reaction score
3,372
Location
The pit
JustTheTip":1dr7zw6l said:
oldhawkfan":1dr7zw6l said:
No. I’ll be forever grateful for that Championship!

You can both be grateful for that championship and disappointed with how the rest of his tenure here was handled.
This.

The OC that shall not be named cost Seattle the back to back.

Still grateful as hell for XLVIII though.
 

Chapow

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
5,346
Reaction score
1,266
Peyton Manning in Indy.

Drew Brees in New Orleans.

Aaron Rodgers in Green Bay.

Some of the greatest QB's in NFL history with long tenures on very good teams "only" won 1 Super Bowl with those teams.

What this tells me is that it's a hell of a lot harder to win championships than most fans realize or are willing to admit. Not only do you have to have a very good team, you also have to have a lot of things go your way.

It took damn near a miracle against Green Bay in the NFCCG for us to even get back to the Super Bowl the year after we won it all.

So no, I don't consider 1 championship with Wilson a disappointment. Quite the opposite actually. I feel like we are awfully fortunate to even have that 1.
 

Boycie

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
2,812
Reaction score
599
Location
Florida and loving GOP country!
John63":b2zhdwtl said:
nwHawk":b2zhdwtl said:
True, but that ball had to be thrown low not cheats high where the CB can break on it. All around stupid. But if thrown low, it’s Lockette or incomplete.

The ball had to be thrown to a spot which it was, the issue was 1.. the WR did not get there. 2. they knew the play. 3.no not low, your throwing over the middle about 3 yards, you throw low it gets tipped. FYI you cannot say for a fact if he throws it low it's Lockett or incomplete. Lockett never even made it to the spot, so low or not interception. The play should never have been called. you don't put your QB into a timing must-throw pattern when he is as mobile as Wilson. Also if you watched Lockett he was not expecting it low. nor have we thrown it low when we ran the play before. IT is a timing pattern meant to thrown in the chest. The problem was our WR never got there. Not to mention the 2 score lead the LOFB gave up in under 9 minutes.

Also, I am very sure when Hass through his INT in we ant the ball and are going to win the game you said it was the Wr. Well, guess what after the ball being stupid the next issue was WR, and then the supposed nudge on the CB that never happened because Browner knew the play and was bigger than Kearse.

We had one timeout still. Give it to Marshawn, and if we don't make it, then throw the ball on the next play.
 

JayhawkMike

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
2,097
Reaction score
826
I do not consider only one Super Bowl win a disappointment.

I consider winning zero or one playoff game each year since the Super Bowl loss as a significant disappointment.
 

Sports Hernia

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
44,755
Reaction score
3,372
Location
The pit
Ace_Rimmer":azts3im0 said:
John63":azts3im0 said:
nwHawk":azts3im0 said:
True, but that ball had to be thrown low not cheats high where the CB can break on it. All around stupid. But if thrown low, it’s Lockette or incomplete.

The ball had to be thrown to a spot which it was, the issue was 1.. the WR did not get there. 2. they knew the play. 3.no not low, your throwing over the middle about 3 yards, you throw low it gets tipped. FYI you cannot say for a fact if he throws it low it's Lockett or incomplete. Lockett never even made it to the spot, so low or not interception. The play should never have been called. you don't put your QB into a timing must-throw pattern when he is as mobile as Wilson. Also if you watched Lockett he was not expecting it low. nor have we thrown it low when we ran the play before. IT is a timing pattern meant to thrown in the chest. The problem was our WR never got there. Not to mention the 2 score lead the LOFB gave up in under 9 minutes.

Also, I am very sure when Hass through his INT in we ant the ball and are going to win the game you said it was the Wr. Well, guess what after the ball being stupid the next issue was WR, and then the supposed nudge on the CB that never happened because Browner knew the play and was bigger than Kearse.

We had one timeout still. Give it to Marshawn, and if we don't make it, then throw the ball on the next play.
This.
 

John63

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2018
Messages
6,651
Reaction score
149
Ace_Rimmer":1j4muq28 said:
John63":1j4muq28 said:
nwHawk":1j4muq28 said:
True, but that ball had to be thrown low not cheats high where the CB can break on it. All around stupid. But if thrown low, it’s Lockette or incomplete.

The ball had to be thrown to a spot which it was, the issue was 1.. the WR did not get there. 2. they knew the play. 3.no not low, your throwing over the middle about 3 yards, you throw low it gets tipped. FYI you cannot say for a fact if he throws it low it's Lockett or incomplete. Lockett never even made it to the spot, so low or not interception. The play should never have been called. you don't put your QB into a timing must-throw pattern when he is as mobile as Wilson. Also if you watched Lockett he was not expecting it low. nor have we thrown it low when we ran the play before. IT is a timing pattern meant to thrown in the chest. The problem was our WR never got there. Not to mention the 2 score lead the LOFB gave up in under 9 minutes.

Also, I am very sure when Hass through his INT in we ant the ball and are going to win the game you said it was the Wr. Well, guess what after the ball being stupid the next issue was WR, and then the supposed nudge on the CB that never happened because Browner knew the play and was bigger than Kearse.

We had one timeout still. Give it to Marshawn, and if we don't make it, then throw the ball on the next play.


I would gave been fine with that too. Again PCs choice.
 

Latest posts

Top