Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Our Defense with Revis?
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:55 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 2:05 pm
Posts: 558
Location: Tri-Cities, Washington
Would Seattle have any interest in Revis? Would people be excited about him and Sherman pairing up? My personal thoughts are that Seattle would have to give up too much and it wouldn't make our defense that much better in order to justify it. I would be lying though if I said it wouldn't be fun to watch. Thoughts?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our Defense with Revis?
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:57 pm 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:32 am
Posts: 282
That secondary just wouldn't be fair, lol


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our Defense with Revis?
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:03 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 2471
My thought is this is not even worth talking about.

Revis's contract is insane, still owed 32 million guaranteed...........AND he's coming off a torn ACL................AND he's a malcontent that's already asked for his contract to be restructured once, and wouldn't hesitate to do it again...............AND you'd have to give up a 1st round pick, and probably more to get him.

My hope is SF trades for him, which would soak up all their available cap space, then he sucks due to nagging injuries and bad attitude.

_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our Defense with Revis?
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:16 pm 
* Master Chief *
* Master Chief *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 7408
Location: CVN-68
We can't even remotely begin to afford Revis. It's not even approachable.

We already have very strong CB's...we don't need "another" one, especially with that contract. We need depth and a reliable slot corner.

What we "need" is a pocket collapser and a consistent pass rush. You fix that, and our already damn good DB's will get even better.

_________________
@SeahawkGreg

Image

"I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" --13thMan


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our Defense with Revis?
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:16 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 10:34 pm
Posts: 1085
revis would ruin team chemistry.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our Defense with Revis?
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:17 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am
Posts: 3100
Not even worth considering. Sando just wrote on his blog that the RAMS shouldn't even consider this trade.

Here's some stuff he wrote regarding the outlook for St. Louis and SF that I think applies (or should apply) to Seattle as well:

"James from Illinois used the most recent NFC West chat to ask whether the St. Louis Rams, armed with additional draft choices in 2013, might be wise to consider a trade for Revis. My response: an emphatic no.

The Rams already have talent at cornerback. They fared well with their 2012 draft choices and should continue building that way. St. Louis is currently in position to stock future rosters with young, affordable and healthy draft choices. There could come a time when the team would be better off trading draft capital for a single veteran player. I don't think this is the time. I don't think an injured Revis is the player.

...

The 49ers have steadfastly avoided paying big money to players from other teams. The team prefers rewarding the players it develops, not upsetting the pecking order in the locker room by valuing outsiders at a higher level. I know that was part of the 49ers' thinking when they watched Asomugha and other high-priced free agents sign elsewhere."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our Defense with Revis?
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:31 pm 
* Master Chief *
* Master Chief *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 7408
Location: CVN-68
Yep...Janoris Jenkins scored 4 TDs last season. He seems to have a knack for the big play.

That was a great pick by Fisher.

_________________
@SeahawkGreg

Image

"I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" --13thMan


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Our Defense with Revis?
 Post Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:25 pm 
* NET X's & O's Guru *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am
Posts: 8620
Location: PNW
viewtopic.php?f=4&t=64744

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 8 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 12HawkFan, 12thMan, Anguish, bafloyd11, BAJAHAWK, ballard1951, BASF, BC-Hawk, bigskydoc, bill21792, Blitzer88, bmorepunk, BobcatHawk, bryantology79, Cad, calihawk, cdn hawk fan, ChrisB Bacon, Chrome_Seahawk, Crizilla, crucifyd, ctrcat, danp1990, davidonmi, DavidSeven, dbmack, DesiHawk, drdiags, dutchman063, entropyrulesall, Exploding, fenderbender123, Floridahawk79, FortWorthSeahawk, Geologic, getnasty, Giblien, glowingeyedseahawk, Google [Bot], Greenhell, gwinnUSAF77, HappyMonkey, HAWK-N-ROLL, Hawkfan77, hawknation2014, HawkRedhooker, HawkRiderFan, HawksSoc, Hawk_Nation, hawxfreak, Hendo66, Hobzen, homerun1970, i5roadrunner, IcedHawk, idahohawk, Incubus, Infamous425, Jac, JaiSeaSea, jake206, Jay-Dog, jblaze, JHawk, joeseahawks, jonesy7748, JonRud, Jville, JZ#1, keatonisballin, KK84, kodiakira, Laloosh, legend38, lsheldon, Lynch'sLamborghini, M2MG, MadSweeney, Maelstrom787, Manbearpig99, MD5eahawks, Mick063, Minne, misfit, misTer, MontanaHawk05, muxpux, NorthwestSportsFan, notyou, NYCoug, okhawkfan, oldhawkfan, Onyx, Pick6, Plainshawk, pocketprotector, Polaris, Popeyejones, purpleworld, ratso, Recon_Hawk, RedAlice, richp01, rideaducati, RobBaker7714409, RolandDeschain, rpdan, ruffENrowdy, RynoHawk, SacHawk2.0, salukihawk12, samwize77, Scottemojo, scutterhawk, seabowl, SeaChickN, seafence82, Seahawkscrazy, Seahwkgal, seatt1eslew, seeg, Shadowhawk, Shadyhawk182, Shaz, Sherminator, Shippy, Sign37now, sjhawkfan, Skeeve, Skip98027, Smoke, SoCalSeahawk, Soppie, soxhawk, Spleenhawk2.0, Sports Hernia, SPRC, Stone Cold, suppaball, sutz, SweTard, tacomahawk, TDBinOLY, Tempest_Crow, the ditch, TheRealDTM, therealjohncarlson, The_Z_Man, tleise32, Tokadub, tom95, Top, TOPHawk, TruHammer07, usmSEAhawk, VancitySeahawk, Vpk0718, warden, Wenhawk, zhawk, Ziggyy108, Zukistubbs and 517 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.