chris98251
Well-known member
If we traded with the Jets we would have traded back down and got a lower 1st and a 2nd and maybe another later rounder, John does not want a contract like that to deal with and guaranteed money.
getnasty":1du0o6na said:Atradees":1du0o6na said:2.5 sacks against the Raiders........sometimes stats are deceiving. He was a good player. He is being paid like a Great player. Now we are spinning about 5 picks out of Clark. That should get us at least one awesome player. I didnt like that Clark didnt want to play when franchised. Had to deal him. He forced our hand.
If Frank Clark doesn't get credit for sacks against the Raiders first round draft pick Kolten Miller does Aaron Donald lose all of his sacks against a Tom Cable lead OL? All good pass rushers pray on mediorce talent.
This is extremely doubtful. If they offered that and we psssed then we’re idiots. If they were indeed talking with the hawks there was more to it than this.TwistedHusky":bu343g5e said:According to Twitter and the broadcast report from it, Frank Clark was good enough the Jets were willing to flip 1sts with us to get him.
To clarify, that means they were willing to give up the #3 pick in the draft for him, in exchange for whatever midrange #1 pick we had and Frank Clark.
That actually might have been better than the glorified 2 2nd round picks we got for him.
Either way, the Jets have a solid defense. If they think Clark is a stud. He is a stud.
And he is.
Tical21":9vvgz506 said:It isn't so much to me that we lost a good player, it's that we lost a 'bad mother', and we really only had two left. Now, our greatest need doesn't play any singular position, we desperately need more bad mothers.
ivotuk":19615m0l said:Frank Clark is a damn good Defensive End. But except for a QB, 1 players does not a SuperB Owl team make.
I'm of the belief that the Defensive Tackle is becoming more important in the defense than they used to be, and the scale of importance difference between DE and DT is beginning to shift due to the change in offensive philosophy.
Pressure up the middle is becoming more important, and I believe that the talent we currently have on the defensive line, along with the prospect of a talented rookie, is what allowed Pete and John to deal Frank Clark.
That 'iron triangle' in the middle was a huge part of Lofa Tatupa's game. When the D-line kept him clean, he was a tackling machine and could run down just about anybody. Would love to get that for Wags. Without solid DT's, the MLB position can be hard for anybody to play.toffee":3cztevo6 said:ivotuk":3cztevo6 said:Frank Clark is a damn good Defensive End. But except for a QB, 1 players does not a SuperB Owl team make.
I'm of the belief that the Defensive Tackle is becoming more important in the defense than they used to be, and the scale of importance difference between DE and DT is beginning to shift due to the change in offensive philosophy.
Pressure up the middle is becoming more important, and I believe that the talent we currently have on the defensive line, along with the prospect of a talented rookie, is what allowed Pete and John to deal Frank Clark.
If Reed can play at the same level as last season and Poona continue his progression, those two backed up by Bobby in the middle, we could be fine there.
A-Dog":36v8p4nz said:This is extremely doubtful. If they offered that and we psssed then we’re idiots. If they were indeed talking with the hawks there was more to it than this.TwistedHusky":36v8p4nz said:According to Twitter and the broadcast report from it, Frank Clark was good enough the Jets were willing to flip 1sts with us to get him.
To clarify, that means they were willing to give up the #3 pick in the draft for him, in exchange for whatever midrange #1 pick we had and Frank Clark.
That actually might have been better than the glorified 2 2nd round picks we got for him.
Either way, the Jets have a solid defense. If they think Clark is a stud. He is a stud.
And he is.
Tical21":q2bzon8i said:It isn't so much to me that we lost a good player, it's that we lost a 'bad mother', and we really only had two left. Now, our greatest need doesn't play any singular position, we desperately need more bad mothers.
Tical21":2si66rh1 said:It isn't so much to me that we lost a good player, it's that we lost a 'bad mother', and we really only had two left. Now, our greatest need doesn't play any singular position, we desperately need more bad mothers.
Grahamhawker":31967yuy said:Tical21":31967yuy said:It isn't so much to me that we lost a good player, it's that we lost a 'bad mother', and we really only had two left. Now, our greatest need doesn't play any singular position, we desperately need more bad mothers.
If it's any consolation, this was in one of the write-ups on Collier:
“When I get on the field, I’m a different person,” Collier said, smiling. “I lock in and I’m ready to go. I’ve always been the meanest guy on the field and that’s how I handle it -- being the meanest guy.”
And most of what I've found backs up his "bad mofo" attitude.