Runningbacks have been terrible since Lynch left

scutterhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
9,826
Reaction score
1,797
Fade":1rzvcmm9 said:
The Hawks have generally drafted well at the position they have just been Cable'd.

Spencer Ware 6th Rd (Starting RB) (Couldn't keep due to deep roster, and he got a DUI.)
Thomas Rawls UDFA (He has regressed under Cable, and gotten worse.)
Alex Collins 5th Rd (Looked like a bust w/Cable, looked like a starter in BAL,)
Chris Carson 7th Rd (Looked impressive.)

They have consistently found starters with late rd picks. The problem to me continues to be coaching.

Suspect Picks
C-Mike 2nd Rd Bust (I wonder with different coaching what could of been, he clearly had talent.)
Procise 3rd Rd (Didn't mis-evaluate the talent. He is just made of glass.)

Bottomline the team needs a new O-Line coach.

These threads that keep popping up focusing on draft picks are missing the point entirely. Cable & Bevell are black holes that drag everyone down with them unless they are All-Pros talent wise, and can overcome them.

Focus on the defensive draft picks if you want to be critical. They at least can be honestly evaluated because they are competently coached on that side of the ball.

The talent evals are spot on at an incredibly high rate, it's just stuff keeps happening, Mainly Cabevell.

It's not so much Bevell...Cable on the other hand, IS the problem with the run game.
The Seahawks letting our RB Coach go last year has screwed things up, Bevell has had to run plays involving RB's by Cable when he's drawing up Offensive schemes.
Inept O-Line play factors in Bigly (LOLOL)
Remember when Big Walt & Steve Hutchinson were plowing the field for Shawn Alexander?
That showed me just how important O Blocking can be for the Run Game....Didn't hurt having Mack Strong lending a helping hand in the boot.
Alexander was almost AUTOMATIC in the Red Zone for getting TD's...Sure wish we could use that type of ZBS again eh? LOL.
 
OP
OP
RussB

RussB

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2015
Messages
2,589
Reaction score
1
Location
Spokane, WA
seahawkfreak":33dy0hgw said:
I'm surprised there hasn't been the query of why all of our RB's for the past two years (Lacy exception) have been injured at one point or another. Are they all just soft? Maybe but something tells me that when a defense can just unload on our running game something is going to give.

Need a quality LG veteran to be our top priority this offseason. Do what you have to do but make it happen FO. I know there are many that say it won't matter if Cable is still here. That might be true but that doesn't mean we do nothing.
O line sucks and is badly coached , and they are probably all just injury prone. They need an elite durable back that can create yards when they arent there sometimes. Like derrick henry of the titans.

Also cable needs to be gone.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
39,639
Reaction score
1,661
Location
Roy Wa.
I think it happens when D lineman are getting multiple shots from different angles versus the RB hitting LB's and getting tackled by DB's more head up or leg tackles, High low hits by Lineman before they even really get started can cause a lot of impact or freak torque type injuries.
 

WmHBonney

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2012
Messages
2,744
Reaction score
1,028
We haven't consistently used a FB since Lynch left. With this line, a FB is NOT an option, it is a must.
 

Sox-n-Hawks

Active member
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Messages
3,647
Reaction score
0
WmHBonney":2vsjw5bz said:
We haven't consistently used a FB since Lynch left. With this line, a FB is NOT an option, it is a must.

:ditto: :ditto: :ditto: :ditto: :ditto: :ditto: :ditto: :ditto: :ditto:
 

Leee-roy

New member
Joined
May 25, 2013
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Chapow":3kppkfri said:
seahawkfreak":3kppkfri said:
our O-line is severely inept.

This is what I think the majority of the problem is. Not that the RB's are all terrible. We shouldn't need a once in a generation RB that can break three tackles in the backfield before carrying another three defenders on his back just to gain three yards.

Best quote of the year!
 

adeltaY

New member
Joined
Oct 11, 2016
Messages
3,281
Reaction score
0
Location
Portland, OR
sprhawk73":3hoovo9g said:
It's really hard to grade the RB's since our oline sucks. We've been trying to replace Lynch with another power back but none of them have had a chance. You'd have to be as elusive as RW to escape the 2 to 4 rushers who are in the backfield on almost every play.

Early in the season and last year we seemed to have some success with the end around. I think that came to an end with the Duane Brown signing.

Hey now, Lockett got facemasked twice on an end around that set us up perfectly for a TD. :mrgreen:
 

Seahawk

Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2015
Messages
204
Reaction score
2
Like others have mentioned, its the run blocking not the running backs.
If Cable stays, he needs to fix his thought process, and the O-Line needs to get better fast, either with new quality players or the existing ones finally figuring it out.
 
OP
OP
RussB

RussB

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2015
Messages
2,589
Reaction score
1
Location
Spokane, WA
Seahawk":36uhyx55 said:
Like others have mentioned, its the run blocking not the running backs.
If Cable stays, he needs to fix his thought process, and the O-Line needs to get better fast, either with new quality players or the existing ones finally figuring it out.
That is true tun blocking is terrible. But lets be honest, no back since lynch has been elite either.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
39,639
Reaction score
1,661
Location
Roy Wa.
You should not need a HOF type running back to have a average to good Running game. As stated Collins and Ware both stand out as players that have excelled in running the ball since leaving Seattle.
 

Chapow

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
5,333
Reaction score
1,249
RussB":2gfqtp5d said:
Seahawk":2gfqtp5d said:
Like others have mentioned, its the run blocking not the running backs.
If Cable stays, he needs to fix his thought process, and the O-Line needs to get better fast, either with new quality players or the existing ones finally figuring it out.
That is true tun blocking is terrible. But lets be honest, no back since lynch has been elite either.

While that is true, if the bar is Marshawn Lynch, it's an awfully damn high bar and one that is going to be extremely difficult to reach again. Marshawn Lynch type RBs are few and far between. We shouldn't require that level of RB to have a competent running game and if we do we're probably pretty screwed.
 

TwistedHusky

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
6,913
Reaction score
1,103
Our run game suffered before Lynch left.

The actual issue was losing Unger. We gutted our run blocking (Unger not the only loss on that) and shortly thereafter Lynch said bye.

Now we reap the fruits of all our weird decisions with the OL.

It isn't a mystery and it isn't really the runningbacks.
 

vin.couve12

New member
Joined
May 27, 2011
Messages
5,079
Reaction score
1
Location
Vancouver, WA
One thing I go back to was Pete talking to Lynch about hitting a specific run lane hard on a play. Lynch was eating some skittles and said, "I'll just read it." Pete said something else to him and Lynch again responded, "I'll just read it."

One thing I find interesting having played RB a long time is that coaches generally want backs to hit a play exactly as designed and ignore the variables...such as maybe a DT directly in running lane. As a RB, if you do your assignment strictly to the letter, you'll end up injured and/or out of a job in no time. Obviously you can't let players just run amuck and do what they want, but in some ways you have to allow a RB to use their natural running talent and not simply be a robot that runs in a strait line into whatever chaos is there.

It's very difficult to trust in play design when your OL are inept. It's like a learned behavior in a bad way. Experience tells you that the hole isn't going to be there and if you run it as designed then it's going to ne a loss of yards, I'm going to fight for inches when I should probably go down, and then 3 guys are going to roll up on my ankle and knee.

Lynch was successful because he was a general talent to succeed regardless, but also because he'll still just shake his head, eat a handful of skittles, and tell the HC that he'll just read it even when the HC tells him to do something specific.

A coach relies and believes in the system.

A RB relies on talent.

These are two sort of clashing ideals that somehow need to engage in marriage. Better OL play will makes these two polarizations less extreme, yes, but it seems that going about the RB situation almost wholely like a systematic college approach where you go about it like X RB is going to be gone in two years and then we'll get another robot, has really hurt (literally) almost every RB we've had since. I think we need to get back to (just a little) RBs just being talented RBs and not this juvenile college systematic approach.

Again, OL has a lot to do with this and the RB position has more high speed collisions than any other, but we haven't done ourselves any favors from a coaching perspective.

I think both the coaches and basically everyone else took for granted just how much overall talent the team amassed. Next man up, indeed...
 

vin.couve12

New member
Joined
May 27, 2011
Messages
5,079
Reaction score
1
Location
Vancouver, WA
I'd stress that there's a huge difference between actual RB talent vs the OL giving a guy even a 2 yard wide running lane. The latter is just a guy basically doing a running sober field sobriety test. That's not talent...or at least not RB talent anyway. lol
 

vin.couve12

New member
Joined
May 27, 2011
Messages
5,079
Reaction score
1
Location
Vancouver, WA
Here's a gem for ya....

How many systems in football, offensive or defensive, are special or unique?

None.

How many players in football are special or unique?

Think about it.
 

jammerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
10,201
Reaction score
1,803
It's hard to have 'good running backs' when each of them is regularly met either at the exchange point or behind the LOS b/c the OLine is so poor runblocking that there are no holes and they let the opposing D penetrate our backfield.

Replace Cable then fix the OLine and watch the running game immediately improve. All of our RBs will start to look specia, well all except Lacy.
 
OP
OP
RussB

RussB

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2015
Messages
2,589
Reaction score
1
Location
Spokane, WA
vin.couve12":2oe9leq8 said:
I'd stress that there's a huge difference between actual RB talent vs the OL giving a guy even a 2 yard wide running lane. The latter is just a guy basically doing a running sober field sobriety test. That's not talent...or at least not RB talent anyway. lol
I have to disagree its not all about the O line even though cable is trash. Look at the cowboys with and without zeke, they still have a good o line and none of the backs come even close to him. David johnson of the cardinals doesnt have that great of an o line and he was a monster last season.

Jags dont have that great of an o line and fournette is a beast. If you have a bad line and have a special back he can make stuff happen. Thats what lynch did for years, now the shit o line is being exposed because there is no great runningback behind it. They need a good running back because i dont think cable is going anywhere.
 

hawker84

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
5,603
Reaction score
318
Location
Tri Cities, WA
Carson is a damn good back, just needs to stay healthy.
Davis is a very serviceable back, and would be a great compliment to Carson.

Lynch was one of a kind, one of an era, he's gone, time to move on.

If they can put something that resembles an O line together, both backs I mentioned would succeed.
 

vin.couve12

New member
Joined
May 27, 2011
Messages
5,079
Reaction score
1
Location
Vancouver, WA
RussB":2mmtu02i said:
vin.couve12":2mmtu02i said:
I'd stress that there's a huge difference between actual RB talent vs the OL giving a guy even a 2 yard wide running lane. The latter is just a guy basically doing a running sober field sobriety test. That's not talent...or at least not RB talent anyway. lol
I have to disagree its not all about the O line even though cable is trash. Look at the cowboys with and without zeke, they still have a good o line and none of the backs come even close to him. David johnson of the cardinals doesnt have that great of an o line and he was a monster last season.

Jags dont have that great of an o line and fournette is a beast. If you have a bad line and have a special back he can make stuff happen. Thats what lynch did for years, now the shit o line is being exposed because there is no great runningback behind it. They need a good running back because i dont think cable is going anywhere.
We're not in disagreement about that. There's a bit of a formula to it, but there's no substitute for an apex back.
 

vin.couve12

New member
Joined
May 27, 2011
Messages
5,079
Reaction score
1
Location
Vancouver, WA
hawker84":ezmugtu5 said:
Carson is a damn good back, just needs to stay healthy.
Davis is a very serviceable back, and would be a great compliment to Carson.

Lynch was one of a kind, one of an era, he's gone, time to move on.

If they can put something that resembles an O line together, both backs I mentioned would succeed.
I still really like Carson. He's got a great overall skillset by nature and he'll play for quite a while in this league as a starter.

He's also still just one guy that plays the position where you're running into people full speed 20 times a game. As far as offense goes, there is none more physically demanding.
 
Top