jkitsune":1lq76dba said:
As an aside, am I the only one that doesn't see the point of defaulting to derogatory nicknames for players who have no current impact on the team? Does calling Percy Harvin "Pussy Harvni" improve the quality of discussion? Solidify your point? Seem clever?
Actually, I think it does. I prefer Pussy No-Heartvin, though.
And I've pointed out and described in some posts that Harvin has all the signs and history of Borderline Personality Disorder with a side helping of Sociopath, and expressed in detail how things went down and why, in terms of his tenure.
Seeing his name caricatured like that helps remind all of us what a sick, distasteful, lazy, self-centered, egotistical fool Harvin is, and how enough signs were there up front, but most of us ignored them, because we saw what we wanted to see, made excuses for him, failed to exercise critical thinking. Wait, us fans are just fans; actually it was Pete that did this, but he brought the fans along for a ride too. Pete got suckered in by Harvin, thinking he had another Bruce Irvin unique athletic talent reclamation project.
For almost any other player, I would agree with you. Pet names like "Clipboard Jesus" are fun and cool and not really derogatory, just descriptive. Spazzelbeck, Hasselsack, well, those were sometimes simply "accurate". However, Harvin is simply a repulsive human being, so a caricature name reference feels more like a helpful reminder than a slam.
Plus, Harvin uniquely conducted himself as a big-time PUSSY as far as NFL players go. The way he held out for a second Dr., kept going 'til he found one who said what he wanted said, then milked the "injury" as long as he possibly could--well, people who knew him from his Vikings time told us he would do that. We didn't want to believe them. They were right. And Pussy is simply an accurate, descriptive name for his behavior as a Seahawk.