NFL considering a change to taunt rule

jhawk91

New member
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
1,223
Reaction score
0
Location
Newberg, Oregon
:34853_doh: ....... :229031_banghead:

This really is turning into the no fun league, stupid just stupid
 

Gap Filler

New member
Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
257
Reaction score
0
I don't think they should take away a TD but I'm all for harsher punishment than a 15 yard penalty. Fine them a game check.
 

kidhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
23,080
Reaction score
2,950
Location
Anchorage, AK
I understand the desire by the NFL to stop taunting, but it shouldn't have an effect on the outcome of the play. The types of fouls that aren't giving a team an illegal advantage on a play shouldn't reverse the play. Taunting doesn't give a team an advantage, so why take away the play? Things like holding, pass interference and such do give an advantage, but taunting doesn't give an advantage in any way, shape or form. If anything, it has more possible ways to disadvantage a team as we saw Monday night when Tate nearly went out of bounds while he was taunting. Personally, I feel if they want to make for a harsher punishment, then fine them increasingly for each taunting foul they incur throughout their career. Eventually either a play stops taunting or goes broke
 

jhawk91

New member
Joined
Mar 10, 2011
Messages
1,223
Reaction score
0
Location
Newberg, Oregon
kidhawk":52qwia4a said:
I understand the desire by the NFL to stop taunting, but it shouldn't have an effect on the outcome of the play. The types of fouls that aren't giving a team an illegal advantage on a play shouldn't reverse the play. Taunting doesn't give a team an advantage, so why take away the play? Things like holding, pass interference and such do give an advantage, but taunting doesn't give an advantage in any way, shape or form. If anything, it has more possible ways to disadvantage a team as we saw Monday night when Tate nearly went out of bounds while he was taunting. Personally, I feel if they want to make for a harsher punishment, then fine them increasingly for each taunting foul they incur throughout their career. Eventually either a play stops taunting or goes broke

This X1000

I'd love to see maybe a lesser punishment in yards but then have a fine system. As you said, taunting doesn't really effect the other team or give any real advantage so I think it should be more of a punishment on the player if they really feel the need to do so. I think these taunting/excessive celebration penalties are stupid in the first place, it's entertainment so it should be fun
 

Sports Hernia

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
44,755
Reaction score
3,372
Location
The pit
kidhawk":1yyo3lkp said:
I understand the desire by the NFL to stop taunting, but it shouldn't have an effect on the outcome of the play. The types of fouls that aren't giving a team an illegal advantage on a play shouldn't reverse the play. Taunting doesn't give a team an advantage, so why take away the play? Things like holding, pass interference and such do give an advantage, but taunting doesn't give an advantage in any way, shape or form. If anything, it has more possible ways to disadvantage a team as we saw Monday night when Tate nearly went out of bounds while he was taunting. Personally, I feel if they want to make for a harsher punishment, then fine them increasingly for each taunting foul they incur throughout their career. Eventually either a play stops taunting or goes broke
Good idea, that's the better route to go IMHO.
 

VivaEfrenHerrera

Active member
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
1,478
Reaction score
0
Location
Mudbone's rumpus room
I liked Pete's take on this too. Basically, he framed it as putting too much pressure on the officials if they're the ones taking points off the board. It really puts them in a rugged spot on borderline cases. They don't need any more pressure to make game-changing calls then they've already got.
 

Laloosh

New member
Joined
Jan 14, 2013
Messages
8,688
Reaction score
0
Location
WA
Aristotle22":1w22ryve said:
It Could Take Away A Touchdown. Seems ridiculous To Me.

Stupid idea and I don't see many owners being excited to potentially lose a game because a 24yr old kid made a bad choice that had zero impact on the play itself.

And I'm one of the people who hated what Tate did.
 

Kixkahn

New member
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
802
Reaction score
0
They need to change it to pansy ball. Where only the sissy's will want to watch. I thought this was a sport where grown men play, maybe I was wrong and it is still pee wee ball. Grow some balls people.
 

Carmon1274

New member
Joined
Nov 11, 2012
Messages
499
Reaction score
0
To me since college football has a taunting rule, I don't really mind about it.

But in basketball there is a penalty
in Baseball hit a HR and stand by plate couple of secs you might get beamed or shouted by the pitcher.
 

MontanaHawk05

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
17,931
Reaction score
474
Can we have the thread title changed as it's misleading? The NFL, as of right now, does not seem to be considered anything per the source we've been given. It's just Dean Blandino saying that HE thinks they will.
 

SeeHawkRun

New member
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
Location
Bellingham, WA
Why is it that Golden Tate seems to (at least unofficially) be the catalyst for massive NFL change. If this rule change does occur (I think it's a dumb idea, for the record), that will make it twice that a play Tate was involved in prompted the NFL (seemingly) to force a change.

The reception against the Packers that brought back the official refs last season, and now a taunt on what ended up being the deciding score of the game.
 

Kixkahn

New member
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
802
Reaction score
0
SeeHawkRun":8exe20vw said:
Why is it that Golden Tate seems to (at least unofficially) be the catalyst for massive NFL change. If this rule change does occur (I think it's a dumb idea, for the record), that will make it twice that a play Tate was involved in prompted the NFL (seemingly) to force a change.

The reception against the Packers that brought back the official refs last season, and now a taunt on what ended up being the deciding score of the game.
Because they hate the Seahawks and us doing well gets under their skin.
 

MLOhawks

New member
Joined
Jul 7, 2009
Messages
2,905
Reaction score
0
Location
Seattle, WA - USA
This is stupid.

I think the game needs more taunting. I miss PRIMETIME high stepping down the sideline as he waves goodbye to the offense, the Dirty Bird in ATL, and all the other coordinated celebrations.

Football is 100x more fun when the eccentric personalities are allowed to shine.
 

Sports Hernia

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
44,755
Reaction score
3,372
Location
The pit
SeeHawkRun":1wes8aft said:
Why is it that Golden Tate seems to (at least unofficially) be the catalyst for massive NFL change. If this rule change does occur (I think it's a dumb idea, for the record), that will make it twice that a play Tate was involved in prompted the NFL (seemingly) to force a change.

The reception against the Packers that brought back the official refs last season, and now a taunt on what ended up being the deciding score of the game.
Don't forget the "slick ball" rule that was created because crazy uncle Jerry cried to his buddy Rog after Romo fumbled the snap on the FG against the a Hawks in the playoffs here.
 

Latest posts

Top