jake206":famptnac said:Todd Gurley or Melvin Gordon with the 1st pick. Not even a question.
McGruff":3bblzv9l said:With or without the injury to Gurley and with or without Beast retiring, I want Gordon bad.
jammerhawk":36151epx said:McGruff":36151epx said:With or without the injury to Gurley and with or without Beast retiring, I want Gordon bad.
Somehow I think JS wants Gordon as well, he's reportedly visited that team twice.
randomation":1r07jmxk said:jammerhawk":1r07jmxk said:McGruff":1r07jmxk said:With or without the injury to Gurley and with or without Beast retiring, I want Gordon bad.
Somehow I think JS wants Gordon as well, he's reportedly visited that team twice.
That would be a fair assumption since we have literally nobody else worth looking at who will be in the draft this year. I wish I was exaggerating sigh.
PackerBacker19":74jyb8y2 said:So, you guys keep up with Seattle a little bit more than I do. What's your feeling, if I may ask, on whether or not Lynch will be back?
Chawks1":37vtz8uu said:jake206":37vtz8uu said:Todd Gurley or Melvin Gordon with the 1st pick. Not even a question.
Gurley all day long. His knick name is "The Beast". Perfect replacement.
Recon_Hawk":37z4qqje said:randomation":37z4qqje said:jammerhawk":37z4qqje said:McGruff":37z4qqje said:With or without the injury to Gurley and with or without Beast retiring, I want Gordon bad.
Somehow I think JS wants Gordon as well, he's reportedly visited that team twice.
That would be a fair assumption since we have literally nobody else worth looking at who will be in the draft this year. I wish I was exaggerating sigh.
Why do you think so? I haven't evaluated the prospects like I have in the past but I keep up with the draft talk. The word is this is suppose to be a deep talented draft for running backs.
Personally I think Pete and John would roll with Turbin and Cmike as their top two RBs if we play without Lynch next year.
kearly":2d16az2q said:Gordon would be incredibly fun to get, but I'm not really sure he could fill Lynch's role. Gurley probably could.
Maybe I am nuts, but I would be okay with Seattle making a Terrell Pryor type trade for Trent Richardson. Pay a 7th rounder and give him a one month audition next August. He absolutely has the physical talent, but needs coaching up badly.
SackofSamuel":26cknbci said:Chawks1":26cknbci said:jake206":26cknbci said:Todd Gurley or Melvin Gordon with the 1st pick. Not even a question.
Gurley all day long. His knick name is "The Beast". Perfect replacement.
Perfect replacement with an ACL injury... how well did that work with Paul Richardson?
kearly":1hnardjk said:Gordon would be incredibly fun to get, but I'm not really sure he could fill Lynch's role. Gurley probably could.
Maybe I am nuts, but I would be okay with Seattle making a Terrell Pryor type trade for Trent Richardson. Pay a 7th rounder and give him a one month audition next August. He absolutely has the physical talent, but needs coaching up badly.
Recon_Hawk":209ysyoe said:after rereading this I see I misunderstood you. You're a Wisconsin fan. I get what you're saying now.
hawknation2015":1ycviwba said:kearly":1ycviwba said:Gordon would be incredibly fun to get, but I'm not really sure he could fill Lynch's role. Gurley probably could.
Maybe I am nuts, but I would be okay with Seattle making a Terrell Pryor type trade for Trent Richardson. Pay a 7th rounder and give him a one month audition next August. He absolutely has the physical talent, but needs coaching up badly.
Yeah, I don't like this idea at all. Trent Richardson goes down way too easily on contact. That's not an instinct that can necessarily be taught. He's what Turbin would be if you gave Turbin 15 carries a game.
And unlike Turbin, he is not an asset in the locker room . . . or as a blocker.