hawknation2015":b4plc3gu said:
He meant "accused" by the media, not accused by Wilson -- although I can see why people would be confused by such a glib comment. Fauria also tweeted later that he made a mistake and jumped to conclusions regarding Wilson.
That was my first thought too. The problem though, is why would Tate call Wilson a 'hypocrite' in this context? Tate says that if Wilson cheated with Fauria's GF, that Wilson is a hypocrite. There is no other way to explain that other than if Wilson had accused someone else of infidelity. Fauria did jump to conclusions but that is beside the point, Tate showed his hand.
Doesn't mean that I think Tate is guilty, false rumors are hardly unheard of in workplace environments. But I think it's pretty clear that he was accused by Wilson.
It is equally clear that there is a huge rift between both players, mutually. No Hawks WR drew more targets than Tate in 2013, but he was a ghost in the playoffs. By appearances they used to be super tight. Now they can barely mask their contempt for each other, and it would appear to have happened very suddenly. I don't care about the drama or the personal life stuff, but I do care that Seattle let one of their best players on offense walk for reasons that don't add up.
I agree with Scotte's take, though I'm not exactly keen on the alternative explanation that our QB is the kind of guy who ships out a talented WR for anything short of an earth shattering reason. I mean it could be true (doubtful), but jeez I hope not.