First Half clock run off

imnKOgnito

Active member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
1,205
Reaction score
0
What was up with that? If I'm recalling correctly, the question was whether or not Rice caught the ball. After they ruled that it was a catch, they ruled that the overturning of the call would result in a live clock, and made us use a timeout. But.... Didn't Rice roll out of bounds after catching the ball?

What did I miss?
 

Hawkpower

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
3,527
Reaction score
856
Location
Phoenix az
imnKOgnito":2j1vhwsx said:
What was up with that? If I'm recalling correctly, the question was whether or not Rice caught the ball. After they ruled that it was a catch, they ruled that the overturning of the call would result in a live clock, and made us use a timeout. But.... Didn't Rice roll out of bounds after catching the ball?

What did I miss?

Yeah, wondered that myself.

The most likely answer, considering what we have seen this year (and tonight with a few more HORRID PI calls) is just piss poor officiating.
 

Carmon1274

New member
Joined
Nov 11, 2012
Messages
499
Reaction score
0
Jeez. Stop complaining. I believe the Officiating was allright. There was 2-3 ticky tacky calls. The most I was irritated was the 4th quarter, Lynch ran for 7 yards, and they called timeout, and got the delay of game penalty.


Other than that officiating was allright.
 

cockeyhawk

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2013
Messages
295
Reaction score
0
The cardinals called a timeout after Lynches carry and they didn't reset the play clock in the 4th.
 

QuahHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 12, 2009
Messages
5,642
Reaction score
116
Location
Issaquah, WA
It was an ugly series for us but at least unlike last week's game we didn't give up a st TD to finish the half.
 

tdigitee

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
285
Reaction score
0
cockeyhawk":3thu6ajz said:
The cardinals called a timeout after Lynches carry and they didn't reset the play clock in the 4th.

Yeah that was ridiculous - I thought NFLN had their graphics wrong because the play clock was in the single digits and Seattle was still in the huddle. When they threw the flag Wilson was beside himself (as was I)
 

Seahawk Mike

New member
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
imnKOgnito":3vnokwxv said:
What was up with that? If I'm recalling correctly, the question was whether or not Rice caught the ball. After they ruled that it was a catch, they ruled that the overturning of the call would result in a live clock, and made us use a timeout. But.... Didn't Rice roll out of bounds after catching the ball?

What did I miss?


I have no idea why the runoff occurred...never heard of that rule. And yes he did stick a foot out of bounds before he was touched...don't understand the call at all.
 

AbsolutNET

New member
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
8,974
Reaction score
1
Location
PNW
NFL clock doesn't stop when a play goes out of bounds until the 2 minute warning in the first half, and 5 mins left in the game, I believe. Well, the clock is stopped until the ball is re-set, and then it starts up again. Only in the last minutes of the halves does the clock stop until the snap.
 

Seahawk Mike

New member
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
AbsolutNET":3au7l2k8 said:
NFL clock doesn't stop when a play goes out of bounds until the 2 minute warning in the first half, and 5 mins left in the game, I believe. Well, the clock is stopped until the ball is re-set, and then it starts up again. Only in the last minutes of the halves does the clock stop until the snap.


Yes...but there were about 36 seconds left in the half (I believe)...

The clock shouldn't have been running if he caught the pass because he put his foot out of bounds almost immediately.

Luckily Unger got called for holding which stopped the clock and allowed Hauschka time to kick the field goal.
 

AbsolutNET

New member
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
8,974
Reaction score
1
Location
PNW
Ah, I haven't seen the game yet, didn't know when it happened.

In this case, I yet again have no idea why that happened the way it did.
 

gtcotcakya

Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2010
Messages
274
Reaction score
0
The 10 second runoff only happens in the last two minutes also. So we were basically penalized (wrongfully) because the officials made two screwups on the same play.
 

kidhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
23,082
Reaction score
2,953
Location
Anchorage, AK
Both of the calls in this thread had me scratching my head.

I know that when the offense has a penalty that results in stoppage of play inside the 2 minute mark, that the offense must either burn a timeout or incur a 10 second run-off of the clock, but I've never before seen an official miss a call, have it overturned by replay then call for a 10 second run-off or a timeout.

Then on the delay of game one in the 4th quarter, I kind of relaxed and kicked back on the couch when the timeout was called, next thing I know, I see Wilson looking around and a flag coming out and heard the call "delay of game". I wasn't as po'd about that call because we had the game well in hand by then, but it still had me scratching my head and apparently most other people as well
 

Cartire

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 2012
Messages
4,580
Reaction score
0
Ten second runoff is only on presnap penalties, not penalties that occur during the play.
 

kidhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 7, 2009
Messages
23,082
Reaction score
2,953
Location
Anchorage, AK
Cartire":2irpzgvy said:
Ten second runoff is only on presnap penalties, not penalties that occur during the play.

That's the thing though, there wasn't a penalty on the play where they did the run off. The clock stopped so the official could review it and overturn the no-catch call. The only reason there was any stoppage was due to an officials error, not a penalty. I'm guessing there may be an obscure rule out there that we never saw enforced before, but until I actually see or hear about this rule, I can only guess that the official screwed up
 
OP
OP
I

imnKOgnito

Active member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
1,205
Reaction score
0
I think if Rice had been touched down in bounds it kinda would have been the correct call, except the clock should just start running, not incur a 10 second runoff. But Rice clearly rolled out of bounds with the ball, and that would have stopped the clock if it had been ruled a catch on the field.
 

JustTheTip

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Oct 3, 2010
Messages
8,081
Reaction score
2,171
Location
On a spreadsheet
imnKOgnito":ih34y2dj said:
I think if Rice had been touched down in bounds it kinda would have been the correct call, except the clock should just start running, not incur a 10 second runoff. But Rice clearly rolled out of bounds with the ball, and that would have stopped the clock if it had been ruled a catch on the field.


Was just re-watching the game and Rice was touched down before going out of bounds. The defender runs over the top of him, taps his back and then promptly starts signaling the official that the pass was incomplete just in case he doesn't know how to do his job.
 
OP
OP
I

imnKOgnito

Active member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
1,205
Reaction score
0
Bitter":1f048nns said:
imnKOgnito":1f048nns said:
I think if Rice had been touched down in bounds it kinda would have been the correct call, except the clock should just start running, not incur a 10 second runoff. But Rice clearly rolled out of bounds with the ball, and that would have stopped the clock if it had been ruled a catch on the field.


Was just re-watching the game and Rice was touched down before going out of bounds. The defender runs over the top of him, taps his back and then promptly starts signaling the official that the pass was incomplete just in case he doesn't know how to do his job.

Yeah... saw that when I re-watched, too. Looks like they got it right, though it seems odd that it would be a 10 second run off instead of just starting the clock.
 

Latest posts

Top