tifferradish":8icqslus said:
Popeyejones":8icqslus said:
Absolutely no way to answer that question.
Clowney should have been ejected IMO.
And just like with Wentz (who would have been out for the game regardless of if Clowney were ejected or not), there's no way to know what would have happened if Clowney was ejected.
Suppose Clowney got ejected and Wentz kept on playing the game. The Seahawks still could have ended up winning. Once you start fiddling with the dials who's to say.
These types of hyptheticals are only good for trying to reach predetermined conclusions IMO.
The game was played and the Seahawks won it, and that won't be changed by fiddling with hypothetial dials.
Ejected? For making a play? It was unfortunate that Wentz got a concussion, but Clowney wasn’t trying to hurt him. Don’t be an idiot.
Oh, go Vikings.
The way to not hurt him is to do what people do 99.5 times out of 100 in that situation when you're not sure if someone is down by contact or not by reaching down and tagging them with your hand. I thought what he did instead was dirty AF and completely inexcusable, but we agree that me thinking that changes nothing in terms of real outcomes OR hypothetical outcomes.
Good luck against the Packers next week and good luck on no injuries too. :2thumbs: