Andrew Luck or Russell Wilson?

Sports Hernia

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
44,755
Reaction score
3,372
Location
The pit
MANUNITED23":1wzcws9c said:
His height for starters, his physical attributes are prototypical of an NFL QB. Mostly my opinion is based on a hunch a feeling that he going to be absolutely amazing.
Hugh Millen is that you? ;)
 

Ozzy

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
9,302
Reaction score
3,826
I will say it again. At this point in their respective careers its not even an argument who has been better. Statistically Wilson is better. Situationally Wilson has had to overcome more this year based on injuries. He does have more talent around him but also plays against more dominant defenses in the NFC than Luck faces in the AFC. Could Luck end up having a better career? Possibly and I can't fault anyone for thinking that but at this point....Wilson has been better.
 

MANUNITED23

New member
Joined
Feb 7, 2011
Messages
1,877
Reaction score
0
Location
Bay Area, CA
Sports Hernia":o7kv3kh4 said:
MANUNITED23":o7kv3kh4 said:
His height for starters, his physical attributes are prototypical of an NFL QB. Mostly my opinion is based on a hunch a feeling that he going to be absolutely amazing.
Hugh Millen is that you? ;)


Alright, you got me.
 

JGfromtheNW

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2012
Messages
2,345
Reaction score
119
Location
On-Track
I agree with austinslater25. I'm trying to not be a homer, but I think the answer is obviously RW and it's not even close. Yeah, their roles in their offenses are different, but let's not hide behind that fact and claim they aren't comparable. IMO, what RW has done over his first two years is far more impressive than what neckbeard has done, especially considering they have different roles.

RW is better stastically, has more wins, more game-winning drives/fourth quarter comebacks, has overcome and outperformed Luck when faced with injury obstacles (both have lost #1 receivers, offensive linemen).
 

Latest posts

Top