ImTheScientist
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2012
- Messages
- 3,724
- Reaction score
- 63
If you could only choose one team which would it be and why?
themunn":2mbxgsz3 said:Jurevicius had a decent season, but we aired the ball out more in 2005 than last year, and I reckon our top 3 guys are more than capable of surpassing that.
themunn":g4rpwe30 said:I don't think there's a single player in the 2005 Defense that would start for the 2013 Seahawks with the exception of 2005 Leroy Hill... and that's possibly only because we haven't drafted yet.
Marcus Tubbs might have made it in, but he's no gimme.
On offense it's a different matter, but Russell Wilson is more enjoyable to watch, and our receiving corps is probably better all around the board, right now I'm not sure if any of the 2005 corps would get into our team, Engram would probably push out Baldwin, but both would be the 4th receiver.
Jurevicius had a decent season, but we aired the ball out more in 2005 than last year, and I reckon our top 3 guys are more than capable of surpassing that.
I still have to go with 27 TD Alexander over Lynch and by some distance and our 2005 left side but really those are the only 3 players that would represent a substantial upgrade over what we currently have (and before anyone gets into the Alexander/Lynch debate, I'm basing this PURELY on Alexander's 2005 season vs what I expect from Lynch in 2013, not their careers or styles. Fact is, 2005 Alexander goes down as one of the greatest seasons by a RB of all time, 11th in yards all time and 2nd in TDs, definitely worthy of the MVP).
But that said, the 2005 Seahawks made the Superbowl. It all counts for nothing is the 2013 Seahawks don't, though I know which team I'd rather watch
themunn":3s3ko6jh said:I don't think there's a single player in the 2005 Defense that would start for the 2013 Seahawks with the exception of 2005 Leroy Hill... and that's possibly only because we haven't drafted yet.
Marcus Tubbs might have made it in, but he's no gimme.
On offense it's a different matter, but Russell Wilson is more enjoyable to watch, and our receiving corps is probably better all around the board, right now I'm not sure if any of the 2005 corps would get into our team, Engram would probably push out Baldwin, but both would be the 4th receiver.
Jurevicius had a decent season, but we aired the ball out more in 2005 than last year, and I reckon our top 3 guys are more than capable of surpassing that.
I still have to go with 27 TD Alexander over Lynch and by some distance and our 2005 left side but really those are the only 3 players that would represent a substantial upgrade over what we currently have (and before anyone gets into the Alexander/Lynch debate, I'm basing this PURELY on Alexander's 2005 season vs what I expect from Lynch in 2013, not their careers or styles. Fact is, 2005 Alexander goes down as one of the greatest seasons by a RB of all time, 11th in yards all time and 2nd in TDs, definitely worthy of the MVP).
But that said, the 2005 Seahawks made the Superbowl. It all counts for nothing is the 2013 Seahawks don't, though I know which team I'd rather watch
DavidSeven":1k6lxcdq said:themunn":1k6lxcdq said:Jurevicius had a decent season, but we aired the ball out more in 2005 than last year, and I reckon our top 3 guys are more than capable of surpassing that.
I think the 2005 Jurevicius would break into the lineup simply because his skill set and size would be a great fit for Russell and this particular team.