fenderbender123
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2012
- Messages
- 13,145
- Reaction score
- 3,151
I went with Mirer because none of the others had long enough of a tenure to really make us suffer.
My thoughts exactly. He got 4 years as a starter.
I don't like considering the whole "what did we get for him" angle, because if we're going to down that path, then there's all kinds of extra variables that lead to everything that's happened to the franchise.
Without Mirer, perhaps Flores doesn't get fired when he does, and we keep him. So then maybe Erickson never happens. Maybe Holmgren doesn't either. Thats why I don't go down that path. Just rate the player based on how good he was, and leave the butterfly effect out of it.