THIS ^^^
I can't imagine ANY team has been on commercial more than the Hawks during their selections over the years.
I can't imagine ANY team has been on commercial more than the Hawks during their selections over the years.
The question was very simple, but as usual has morphed into a myriad of discussions.
Again here is the question:
With their first pick in the 2025 draft, the Seattle Seahawks select….
(Mykel Williams)!!!!
Not to be a hard ass, but there’s plenty of other threads discussing these other topics.The nerve of some people... letting a discussion thread on a discussion board devolve into a discussion.
The confusion probably came from your post not saying anything like that.Not to be a hard ass, but there’s plenty of other threads discussing these other topics.
I just wanted to have a simple thread, asking everyone’s opinion on who they believe the Seahawks will make their first pick.
Yeah but those guys went #2 and #1 respectively.If we are talking about boom or bust edge players, the real gems are the ones that are elite athletes. I will still take a great athlete at edge. The game changers are your elite athletes. Try and score as many elite athletes at edge as much as possible.
Think, Julius Peppers and Myles Garrett!
(1 pick only please)The confusion probably came from your post not saying anything like that.
And then you discussed your reasoning for the pick. And didn't use the phrase "no discussion please".(1 pick only please)
Josh Simmons (OT/Guard OSU)
Are you sure about that?
How successful is the moving a college tackle to NFL guard strategy? Not questioning it, just wondering how well it works.Most of these tackles will convert to guard in the pros so this a deep draft with OGs for that reason but JS better not screw this up.
I get it, but many of these discussions went off into tangents off topic like saying that we’re gonna go into commercial break and we’ll trade the pick down without the member ever mentioning who they thought we would pick with our first pick. No big deal.And then you discussed your reasoning for the pick. And didn't use the phrase "no discussion please".
Because we always go to commercial break and then a trade will happen it will take reading the ticker for 15 minutes to know what happened since commentators have moved on. It's valid for our pick discussion since it has happened at least 3 times I can remember. Also, since a trade happened, we don't know when our next pick is until we get some information, I made the player selection for the spot just not for the Seahawks.I get it, but many of these discussions went off into tangents off topic like saying that we’re gonna go into commercial break and we’ll trade the pick down without the member ever mentioning who they thought we would pick with our first pick. No big deal.
THIS ^^^
I can't imagine ANY team has been on commercial more than the Hawks during their selections over the years.
Well, you improve your roster by bringing in talent that can challenge for spots. That's not pointless at all. That's football.We already have ten picks and Schneider hasn't moved down in the first in six years. We're not drafting high enough, nor is the first round deep enough, where moving down is likely to net us a bevy of day 2 picks.
Feels largely pointless. We only have so many roster spots for rookies.
Nah manThis
I notice this year after yearI don't usually get into the anti-Seahawk media bias stuff...but I read that every one of our eight draft picks last year happened on commercial break. That's got to be intentional.
Great comment and needed to be said. I don't agree that the draft is just a crapshoot. If so, just throw darts at a board with hidden names assigned to the numbers. No, that's not it at all. Try to make informed decisions. Sometimes take a chance. But, there's also wisdom in getting more picks, more UDFA's. You never know when you might land a Doug Baldwin.If you guys agree that the draft is not predictable than taking more shots at it makes sense. IF there isn't a guy that you feel really strongly about.