The irony here is palpable. You have went out of your way to bash bleacher report when they have said anything negative about Wilson. Now that you find an article that suits your narrative you make a thread about it. Well done sir.Anthony!":3lmd19i5 said:
Spin Doctor":fkj3fr9q said:The irony here is palpable. You have went out of your way to bash bleacher report when they have said anything negative about Wilson. Now that you find an article that suits your narrative you make a thread about it. Well done sir.Anthony!":fkj3fr9q said:
SeaToTheHawks":2o1vwa2c said:Spin Doctor":2o1vwa2c said:The irony here is palpable. You have went out of your way to bash bleacher report when they have said anything negative about Wilson. Now that you find an article that suits your narrative you make a thread about it. Well done sir.Anthony!":2o1vwa2c said:
Lol, and the irony of your post is hilarious too....Your name being "Spin Doctor" being the one pointing out the OP's spin on things.
So you're saying the reason you posted it is because the opinion in it is vastly different from yours?Anthony!":ecr7geuf said:SeaToTheHawks":ecr7geuf said:Spin Doctor":ecr7geuf said:The irony here is palpable. You have went out of your way to bash bleacher report when they have said anything negative about Wilson. Now that you find an article that suits your narrative you make a thread about it. Well done sir.Anthony!":ecr7geuf said:
Lol, and the irony of your post is hilarious too....Your name being "Spin Doctor" being the one pointing out the OP's spin on things.
All I did was post it I never gave my opinion on it, so the only irony comes from the hater that is spin doctor, who could not wait to spin this in some way to suite his purpose.
SeaToTheHawks":2md9tmlk said:Spin Doctor":2md9tmlk said:The irony here is palpable. You have went out of your way to bash bleacher report when they have said anything negative about Wilson. Now that you find an article that suits your narrative you make a thread about it. Well done sir.Anthony!":2md9tmlk said:
Lol, and the irony of your post is hilarious too....Your name being "Spin Doctor" being the one pointing out the OP's spin on things.
So, why did you post an article from bleacher report? You have gone out of your way to slander, and demerit bleacher report, yet here you are posting a bleacher report article that happens fits your opinions in other threads. You may have not posted your opinion, but your opinion is implied by your past actions on this forum. Can you not see the hypocrisy here?Anthony!":1krpuk6u said:SeaToTheHawks":1krpuk6u said:Spin Doctor":1krpuk6u said:The irony here is palpable. You have went out of your way to bash bleacher report when they have said anything negative about Wilson. Now that you find an article that suits your narrative you make a thread about it. Well done sir.Anthony!":1krpuk6u said:
Lol, and the irony of your post is hilarious too....Your name being "Spin Doctor" being the one pointing out the OP's spin on things.
All I did was post it I never gave my opinion on it, so the only irony comes from the hater that is spin doctor, who could not wait to spin this in some way to suite his purpose.
Hawks46":oh4ek0cy said:Sweet ! So according to BR, we can pay Wilson the 5th highest QB salary and that's fair.
Reading some of the comments and a few things are puzzling (to be nitpicky):
Wilson rated a 4/5 on mobility. Exactly how is Russ supposed to be MORE mobile than he is ?
Luck rated an 18/20 for decision making. Doesn't he have like double the amount of INT's that Wilson and Brady have the last 3 years ?
Brady an 18/20 on arm strength. Really ? Doesn't look like it on the field.
Offseason. It's hard on everybody.JAGHAWK":qnj66rr5 said:I remember the good ol days when we used harass rival team fanbases... now we just harass our own. Lol
JAGHAWK":gmc2zd1t said:I remember the good ol days when we used harass rival team fanbases... now we just harass our own. Lol
Anthony!":szef60fo said:Hawks46":szef60fo said:Sweet ! So according to BR, we can pay Wilson the 5th highest QB salary and that's fair.
Reading some of the comments and a few things are puzzling (to be nitpicky):
Wilson rated a 4/5 on mobility. Exactly how is Russ supposed to be MORE mobile than he is ?
Luck rated an 18/20 for decision making. Doesn't he have like double the amount of INT's that Wilson and Brady have the last 3 years ?
Brady an 18/20 on arm strength. Really ? Doesn't look like it on the field.
Never said I agreed with it, I just posted it. The pay #5 part, yeah you know that is not how it works.
Fade":2whlyczx said:Mobility 4/5 ?????
![]()
*edit* You would think the best scrambling QB in the league that ran for 849 yards, and led the league in yards per carry would warrant a 5/5.
Well, obviously they have the 5/5 make-believe Quarterback in mind, and that's why they were comfy grading Wilson a 4 out of 5. SMHFade":1bn4r8b1 said:Mobility 4/5 ?????
![]()
*edit* You would think the best scrambling QB in the league that ran for 849 yards, and led the league in yards per carry would warrant a 5/5.
How do you know that some of these guys aren't finished taking potshots?, seems to me like some tried to derail the OP's link right from the get-go.Hasselbeck":1rw0a12i said:Back on the actual topic.. I think this is a pretty fair rating. No idea how Brees is 6th considering Romo, Stafford and Roeth all were much better last year than Brees.. but that's my only issue with it.
scutterhawk":1lwxot1l said:Well, obviously they have the 5/5 make-believe Quarterback in mind, and that's why they were comfy grading Wilson a 4 out of 5. SMHFade":1lwxot1l said:Mobility 4/5 ?????
![]()
*edit* You would think the best scrambling QB in the league that ran for 849 yards, and led the league in yards per carry would warrant a 5/5.