twisted_steel2":2ltfcrbd said:
Shaquem's a good one, hadn't thought of him. But you're right.
I'll go with Ed Dickson. Never been healthy, only 1.7 in dead money if they cut him. Plus I think they'll be happy with Vannett, Dissly and Hollister.
Edit: Dickson situation is actually more complicated....
https://12thmanrising.com/2019/08/07/se ... n-surgery/ :x
Dickson is one of those players who is probably liked much more by the team than by the fans. The age and health are a valid pair of issues, but Seattle is still a run-first team. I'm not sure why people just keep on forgetting that, year after year, as they write their amateur analyses, but here's another example. Dickson wasn't paid to get 90 catches; he's paid to make the most of what he gets (like Jaron Brown), and he's paid to block. And block he does.
Ever wondered how elite rushing teams make their hay? It takes good perimeter blocking by the tight ends and even the wide receivers. That's why willingness to block has always been a high priority for obtaining even wide receivers on this team. We ran really well last year in part because Nick Vannett has quietly become an upper-tier blocker.
Hollister could just as easily have been a hedge for Dissly as Dickson. Both of them having a history of gimp, and Hollister being available for the cheap, made it a no-brainer. Dickson may incidentally find his way off the team because of that, but I doubt Hollister was brought in just to help jettison him.