TheRealDTM
New member
I'm starting to think he never plays for the hawks again......

That's the way I'm leaning right now.HawkFan72":2rkac1zb said:With how stubborn Kam is being, I'm starting to think he shows up to play the final 6 games so he can accrue a "full season" of service and get a year knocked off his contract. That will give him more leverage when he does the same thing next year.
No, I believe it would be prorated for each game he plays, per the CBA I believe.northseahawk":z3i0d2t5 said:So can the Seahawks prevent him from getting his yearly salary if he reports at the 10th week???
This selfish bastard better not get a dime for this year if he doesn't report this week.
HawkFan72":1pyl4i7z said:With how stubborn Kam is being, I'm starting to think he shows up to play the final 6 games so he can accrue a "full season" of service and get a year knocked off his contract. That will give him more leverage when he does the same thing next year.
Depends, the Seahawks could waive the fees it if they so desire, however I'm inclined to believe that Pete Carroll, and Schneider are going to play hardball. Kam Chancellor has no leverage here, he's playing a fools game. The Seahawks don't have to waive the fines, and they don't have to pay him for missing games. That money is only going to fly out of his pocket, and the more time that goes by, the more money he is going to lose.massari":38s22psh said:HawkFan72":38s22psh said:With how stubborn Kam is being, I'm starting to think he shows up to play the final 6 games so he can accrue a "full season" of service and get a year knocked off his contract. That will give him more leverage when he does the same thing next year.
But he still wouldn't get paid for the missed 10 games, right?
Spin Doctor":17a5e7qq said:I do not understand what his 'end game' is here.
Popeyejones":39ox7xso said:Spin Doctor":39ox7xso said:I do not understand what his 'end game' is here.
I think his end game is that of his three remaining years on his contract this year is the last year that he has any meaningful guaranteed money (7.5 million this year, compared to 2 million next year and 1 million the year after that).
To be fair I think this is one of the consequences of having let Lynch into the hen house.
Kam at the very least wants a significant portion of his salaries for next year and the year after to be converted into guarantees, and they've already given up the goods on toeing the line at the request (Lynch), and from a cap perspective they can't really make a good argument for why they shouldn't do it.
Basically, they don't want to do it because then everyone else will want it and they'll have to deal with holdouts, but they lost their chip in this argument because they've already done it last year.
It's true the Hawks have all the leverage here, but it doesn't mean it's a good place for them to be in. Using your All Pro safety to symbolically toe the line the year after you let your All Pro RB walk right over it is definitely not an enviable position to be in, even though if you choose to do so you'll ultimately win the battle.
Laloosh":2q24ae0y said:Granted, it's not a good place but it's hardly the team's fault. That's absurd. It was Kam's choice and he's not getting his money.
From a cap standpoint, I disagree. They do have a good argument. "We're not going to renegotiate contracts with 3 years left on them, Kam. It will kill this team from a cap perspective."
Pretty good argument imo.
themunn":63qckz5k said:Laloosh":63qckz5k said:Granted, it's not a good place but it's hardly the team's fault. That's absurd. It was Kam's choice and he's not getting his money.
From a cap standpoint, I disagree. They do have a good argument. "We're not going to renegotiate contracts with 3 years left on them, Kam. It will kill this team from a cap perspective."
Pretty good argument imo.
It won't kill the cap though, by guaranteeing the salary the projected cap number remains unchanged. The only way it would affect the cap is if Kam gets injured this year and they decide to cut him; as that salary is now guaranteed they don't save against the cap as they would under the current contract.
Now that's a fair enough approach to take with your backup guys and even your low-end starters, but the only real argument against doing it for Kam from the team's point of view is "it removes our flexibility to cut you next year". And for an all-pro safety, former team captain and designated "core player", that's a pretty flimsy argument.
Of course, we've not been privy to the contract discussions, and I'd actually be quite surprised if the team HADN'T offered that by now, so it may well be that he IS asking for more money, hence the continued holdout.
lukerguy":2l7ibxt8 said:I'm going to guess either today or not for a few weeks in to the season. I have a good feeling about today though.
Popeyejones":20y05nmc said:Spin Doctor":20y05nmc said:I do not understand what his 'end game' is here.
I think his end game is that of his three remaining years on his contract this year is the last year that he has any meaningful guaranteed money (7.5 million this year, compared to 2 million next year and 1 million the year after that).
To be fair I think this is one of the consequences of having let Lynch into the hen house.
Kam at the very least wants a significant portion of his salaries for next year and the year after to be converted into guarantees, and they've already given up the goods on toeing the line at the request (Lynch), and from a cap perspective they can't really make a good argument for why they shouldn't do it.
Basically, they don't want to do it because then everyone else will want it and they'll have to deal with holdouts, but they lost their chip in this argument because they've already done it last year.
It's true the Hawks have all the leverage here, but it doesn't mean it's a good place for them to be in. Using your All Pro safety to symbolically toe the line the year after you let your All Pro RB walk right over it is definitely not an enviable position to be in, even though if you choose to do so you'll ultimately win the battle.