Yup. Or there would be a huge line to get the kid.
The Bengals front office is a joke.
The Bengals front office is a joke.
That is the problem.. Too much to three players on offense and scraps leftInteresting how they came up with the $ for Burrow, Chase and Higgins. Yet, when their best and most consistent player wants a new deal, he gets nothing. This type of thing has been going on there since Carson Palmer was the QB.
He could take a season vacation, get his situation handled and go back into the draft next April.From my understanding, the Bengals have inserted some clause in the contract which somehow negates the rookie guaranteed money....contrary to the CBA. It's not him at all. He just doesn't want to set precedent by signing something that doesn't even comply with the CBA. Honestly, how can the Bengals even propose this if it is not compliant? As far as him leaving, he is not an employee of the Bengals until he signs, so should he really be there?
It is worth a quick look at the bengals forumHe could take a season vacation, get his situation handled and go back into the draft next April.
That would be funnayyy!!
What is it with Cincinnati?
Are the Cincinnati Reds still operated by that cheapskate old eccentric woman?
Look at the Bengals , they've had some great players over the years , even went to 2 championships.
Cursed .
Yes indeed ..much thanks OstatehawkIt is worth a quick look at the bengals forum
JUNGLE NOISE
The place to discuss anything and everything relating to the Cincinnati Bengals. {Jungle Noise is for BENGALS FANS ONLY!}thebengalsboard.com
They are not happy with ownership
And there is a bonus thread about Fant visiting!
If that is indeed what it was about, I can see ownerships stance. How many times have teams stepped up and selected a player only to be slapped in the face ?Yeah, Stewart signed. He was able to bump up the fully, non-voidably guaranteed amount, but didn’t get the Bengals to budge on the core dispute over having some of his guaranteed money become voidable if he misbehaves.
They didn’t, and it’s a big part of why NFL owners are pushing for this kind of language now.If that is indeed what it was about, I can see ownerships stance. How many times have teams stepped up and selected a player only to be slapped in the face ?
Did Cleveland have any contract language regarding Deshaun Watson and his "problems"? I bet if they didn't, they wished they had.
These young men are so lucky to have the skills to play in the NFL. The owners do their part by paying these young men a lot of money ( the top guys anyways).They didn’t, and it’s a big part of why NFL owners are pushing for this kind of language now.
Where would he leave to? The Rams are the only ones that come to mind as possibly in the QB market who have the wherewithal for cap manipulation to make such a move. But eventually the same problem would arise for them if Burrow would get a contract similar to what he has now.Eventually Burrow is gonna get annoyed and leave.
They needed the "Rub and Tug" clause.If that is indeed what it was about, I can see ownerships stance. How many times have teams stepped up and selected a player only to be slapped in the face ?
Did Cleveland have any contract language regarding Deshaun Watson and his "problems"? I bet if they didn't, they wished they had.
Non- happy ending sectionThey needed the "Rub and Tug" clause.
To be fair they traded for him with his "problems" on full displayIf that is indeed what it was about, I can see ownerships stance. How many times have teams stepped up and selected a player only to be slapped in the face ?
Did Cleveland have any contract language regarding Deshaun Watson and his "problems"? I bet if they didn't, they wished they had.