glenwo2
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2025
- Messages
- 6,239
- Reaction score
- 7,249
Brown would ACTUALLY bite on this. No Joke.Seahawks trade a 7th for him please
Most teams have language in the rookie contract that says that if you screw up in some major way--i.e. get suspended for off-field behavior, take PEDs, etc--that your guaranteed money for that year is gone. The Bengals in the Shemar Stewart contract want to change that so all your guaranteed money is gone if you have one of these incidents. It's a dumb thing for the Bengals to be insisting on when no one else in the league does it.From my understanding, the Bengals have inserted some clause in the contract which somehow negates the rookie guaranteed money....contrary to the CBA. It's not him at all. He just doesn't want to set precedent by signing something that doesn't even comply with the CBA. Honestly, how can the Bengals even propose this if it is not compliant? As far as him leaving, he is not an employee of the Bengals until he signs, so should he really be there?
They're the Bengals. They operate like $#!+, lol.
I, for one, would welcome him with open arms if I was JS.From my understanding, the Bengals have inserted some clause in the contract which somehow negates the rookie guaranteed money....contrary to the CBA. It's not him at all. He just doesn't want to set precedent by signing something that doesn't even comply with the CBA. Honestly, how can the Bengals even propose this if it is not compliant? As far as him leaving, he is not an employee of the Bengals until he signs, so should he really be there?
The mariners are not that badThe Bengals are the mariners of the nfl.
A more accurate statement would be "The Bengals are the Angels of the NFL"The mariners are not that bad