Throwdown
Well-known member
His hands are just too damn big.
C-Dub":2z68x7pi said:Nuff said!seahawk 17":2z68x7pi said:96.8 QB Rating and undefeated. He's doing fine.
:thirishdrinkers:
sc85sis":zg84vnoe said:This might be an unpopular statement, and I'm in no way guaranteeing I'm right about it either. But I think that Russell may always take a second or so longer to make his throws than a guy like Manning because he's, um, well--he's short. He has to find the open throwing lane as well as the open receiver. If that is the case, it means he'll need pass pro to hold up a smidge longer too. And considering the quality of the front 7 for the Panthers and '9ers, I'm not surprised his play has been a bit off.
nanomoz":3t47wyhq said:C-Dub":3t47wyhq said:Nuff said!seahawk 17":3t47wyhq said:96.8 QB Rating and undefeated. He's doing fine.
:thirishdrinkers:
Unless you consider the fact that these slow starts by Wilson and the Hawks were largely responsible for ending the 2012 campaign short of the super bowl.
His QB Rating against Atlanta was like 109, his ESPN new metric rating was over 90. But getting outscored 20-0 in the first half was a problem, and could continue to be a problem against top tier teams.
I want the Seahawks to win the friggin' super bowl. I want to talk about why they might, and what might hold them back. Winning two games in the early season doesn't preclude analysis.
Tech Worlds":eqpqh0k1 said:Why do people keep saying Wilson has a problem? He was balls out against Carolina.
Had we had any other Seahawk QB of the past we do not win that game. He made plays they simply could not.
Is Wilson Payton Manning? Of course not, but he is a baller and is not the reason for our offensive struggles.
bestfightstory":37b3fetm said:nanomoz":37b3fetm said:C-Dub":37b3fetm said:Nuff said!seahawk 17":37b3fetm said:96.8 QB Rating and undefeated. He's doing fine.
:thirishdrinkers:
Unless you consider the fact that these slow starts by Wilson and the Hawks were largely responsible for ending the 2012 campaign short of the super bowl.
His QB Rating against Atlanta was like 109, his ESPN new metric rating was over 90. But getting outscored 20-0 in the first half was a problem, and could continue to be a problem against top tier teams.
I want the Seahawks to win the friggin' super bowl. I want to talk about why they might, and what might hold them back. Winning two games in the early season doesn't preclude analysis.
themunn":9ceo1820 said:Surprising how Wilson gets the blame for the 20-0 first half in Atlanta.
He's not the one that fumbled on the goalline
He's not the one that failed to run for 3rd and 1 and the subsequent 4th and 1
He's not the one that allowed 20 points to be scored against us.
Yes, he took a sack at the end of the half which cost us 3 points. But that cost us THREE points, not 20.