TwistedHusky
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2013
- Messages
- 7,109
- Reaction score
- 1,279
I think it is reasonable to say that Russell Wilson has not exactly lit the world on fire during the past 2 games.
The good part is that the rest of the team has been so good we haven't needed him to.
Also, last year he took a while to get going so maybe he is just a slow starter?
Sure there were some blowouts, so he got a few games that were essentially free passes, but what he did in Chicago and more importantly, in Atlanta were performances that screamed top QB. So what is going on now?
Carolina still has one of the better front 7s out there, but the secondary is/was shaky so why couldn't we take better advantage of them? And the 49ers have another one of the better front 7s too, so that has to account for some of the reduction in his effectiveness but he clearly has not taken that big leap in effectiveness that we expected to see in a Yr 1 vs Yr 2 QB.
Is something missing? Is this on him? The playcalling? Personnel changes (lack of effective TE for instance)? Sophomore slump or just a weird statistical hiccup at Game 2 in a much longer season where this all evens out?
Clearly, winning games without needing your QB to light the world on fire is a plus. But if this team wants to win everything, it seems you would need the QB to be performing at a high level too.
What gives?
The good part is that the rest of the team has been so good we haven't needed him to.
Also, last year he took a while to get going so maybe he is just a slow starter?
Sure there were some blowouts, so he got a few games that were essentially free passes, but what he did in Chicago and more importantly, in Atlanta were performances that screamed top QB. So what is going on now?
Carolina still has one of the better front 7s out there, but the secondary is/was shaky so why couldn't we take better advantage of them? And the 49ers have another one of the better front 7s too, so that has to account for some of the reduction in his effectiveness but he clearly has not taken that big leap in effectiveness that we expected to see in a Yr 1 vs Yr 2 QB.
Is something missing? Is this on him? The playcalling? Personnel changes (lack of effective TE for instance)? Sophomore slump or just a weird statistical hiccup at Game 2 in a much longer season where this all evens out?
Clearly, winning games without needing your QB to light the world on fire is a plus. But if this team wants to win everything, it seems you would need the QB to be performing at a high level too.
What gives?