The Radish
New member
Tell ya what, I'll sticky this.
:shock:
:shock:
Of course this is priority #1...but it is exciting to have a vested interest in other games, which adds intrigue to our seasonjack_patera":1gz2lgiu said:'hawks just need to keep winning...the hell with the rest...
Yeah, makes the other games more fun to watch.samwize77":28b3lwvs said:Of course this is priority #1...but it is exciting to have a vested interest in other games, which adds intrigue to our seasonjack_patera":28b3lwvs said:'hawks just need to keep winning...the hell with the rest...![]()
Cartire":22vvyh0a said:jamsomatic":22vvyh0a said:I want the Bears to eliminate the Vikings and keep the Bears/Packers race on full tilt. Frankly neither the Bears not Vikings trouble me. They will both lose multiple games for remainder of season. Chicago is crippled with Urlacher and Jennings sustaining injuries vs. us. Plus I would rather see Chicago take that division than Green Bay although I don't believe they will.
This was my biggest question as well. CHI taking the division back is the most optimal solution. But looking at GB's schedule, they have to lose the bears to give it up. I just dont think CHI can beat GB. GB always smothers them and I dont see things changing here. So I went with the next optimal which is, if we dont get the division, having a tie-breaker over chi puts us at chance at the 5th seed playing against the 3rd seed Packers. We can claim a another victory over everyone who said we cant beat the Packers on their turf.
*note, that the assumption of GB being 3rd string is that SF didnt lose more the one game because they remained Division champs over us.
BocciHawk":xzjvpsyc said:Cartire":xzjvpsyc said:jamsomatic":xzjvpsyc said:I want the Bears to eliminate the Vikings and keep the Bears/Packers race on full tilt. Frankly neither the Bears not Vikings trouble me. They will both lose multiple games for remainder of season. Chicago is crippled with Urlacher and Jennings sustaining injuries vs. us. Plus I would rather see Chicago take that division than Green Bay although I don't believe they will.
This was my biggest question as well. CHI taking the division back is the most optimal solution. But looking at GB's schedule, they have to lose the bears to give it up. I just dont think CHI can beat GB. GB always smothers them and I dont see things changing here. So I went with the next optimal which is, if we dont get the division, having a tie-breaker over chi puts us at chance at the 5th seed playing against the 3rd seed Packers. We can claim a another victory over everyone who said we cant beat the Packers on their turf.
*note, that the assumption of GB being 3rd string is that SF didnt lose more the one game because they remained Division champs over us.
5th seed plays at 4th seed
6th seed plays at 3rd seed
(just correcting what you typed above)
I personally would prefer to not play the Packers in the first round, if at all possible. I think we win in Chicago, I think we win in Atlanta, have a great chance in NY against the Giants, obviously we win at home. The best scenarios for us involve taking the #2 seed away from SF by winning the division outright, getting a first round bye, and playing at home. If we have to be a wild card team, IMHO, we want the Bears to take the North from the Packers, so if we travel, we're not going to Lambeau.
Just MHO.
Cartire":1x6cb5zt said:RAMS (5-6-1) vs BILLS (5-7)
Lets go: Bills
Why: Rams are currently 4-0-1 in the division. I know, doesnt make any sense. Regardless, the Rams winning out could be a knife in Seattle's back if Seattle lose 1 of its next 3. Really, Really, Really need Rams to lose.
Seahawk Sailor":30934irt said:Cartire":30934irt said:RAMS (5-6-1) vs BILLS (5-7)
Lets go: Bills
Why: Rams are currently 4-0-1 in the division. I know, doesnt make any sense. Regardless, the Rams winning out could be a knife in Seattle's back if Seattle lose 1 of its next 3. Really, Really, Really need Rams to lose.
Agree with you here on all but the above game. Go Rams this week. Why? Because if the Rams in any way affect our playoff push, it will be because we lost to them again at home, not because they beat the Bills. At this point, I'd like to see them score a few more wins and just miss out on the playoffs. No way I want them picking high in the draft with the amount of draft ammo they already have. We want them drafting very low for the next few years. Several seasons of 8-8 or 7-9 would be in our best interests.