We lost because we didn't have Zach Miller

[tom sawyer]

...


Well I haven't seen this excuse yet. So there!! hwell2:

8)

 

[IndyHawk84]

Actually glad to see this was a joke! lmao. I was going to jump in here and be like really?! Zack is the reason we played soft and got our asses kicked!?

But good one!

 

[minormillikin]

Unger might have something to do with it, as much as anyone. I haven't looked into it yet, but I think last season or before we had some bad games when Unger was out. That guy has been the leader of the oline for a while and it must have some effect when he's replaced by a new guy.

In any case... The loss wasn't caused by one thing alone, obviously. And, the Cowboys weren't making things easy with all of their "execution."

 

[SoulfishHawk]

Well, I'd say we lost more because WE HAVE BEVELL. :lol:

 

[seahawks187]

joke or not zach miller would of helped

 

[AF_Hawk]

Injuries played a factor but that doesnt excuse the inability to execute THAT much. Dallas controlled the clock just like San Diego did but unlike San Diego the Seahawks offense was ineffective due to many factors, including key injuries.

 

[daveman918]

joke or not zach miller would of helped

:13:

Having Zach for Blocking and Unger to call out protections would have helped a ton.

 

[byau]

Good one you got me. (and sure he would have helped, and .. you got me)