VivaEfrenHerrera":1tcj5877 said:
daketah":1tcj5877 said:
...WT3 has a responsibility to the Seahawks as is defined in his employment agreement (contract). The question as to whether or not it is "immoral" is irrelevant in the face of his contract.
Oh, very definitely. But as well, the Seahawks and their parent entity have responsibilities to their employes and customers. These include having rational, reasonable, humane HR policies.
That's ridiculous. You act as if they're violating human rights here. Look a company can prohibit whatever they want. Nobody is held at gunpoint and forced to work anywhere. These players can go work somewhere else, or not at all, and smoke themselves silly if they like.
Most employers will terminate someone if they can't control their alcohol intake and it presents problems, so it's not as if they're picking on weed. It's just that employers have decided that habitual marijuana use presents a bigger risk to productivity and is a bigger problem. Whether that's correct or not (my personal opinion, emphasis on personal, is that it is a bigger problem) who cares. It's not up to us and it's not a question of fairness because again, nobody is forced to work anywhere.
The fact is though that once you enter into a contract your livelihood and success is tied to your ability to live up to the terms. If you can't, your weakness is the ONLY thing to blame for letting down your teammates and whoever is depending on you to bring the paycheck home.