Walter Jones a first year HOF Semifinalist

Kixkahn

New member
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
802
Reaction score
0
Discussion last night on show, most were calling Walter a lock in. A lot of people are certain he will go in first time.
 

drdiags

New member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
10,682
Reaction score
1
Location
Kent, Washington
RiverDog":1z0f3r32 said:
I don't like calling anyone "best ever" as I don't think it fair to compare players from different eras as the game changes so much, but he was arguably the best of his day, his only real competition coming from Jonathan Ogden, of whom I heard has a similar holding stat.

If Walt doesn't get elected on the first ballot, they need to burn the place down.

Though I have no love lost for division rivals Rams, you have to include Orlando Pace into that trio. I suspect you will see Ogden, Jones and Pace all make it on their first shot at the hall. So far 1 out of 3 with expectations to have 2 out of 3 this year. Pace has always been a concern for me when it came to the HoF and Jones, because of the Superbowl win he had. Out of the 3, Jones chance at the ring went up in smoke in Detroit, but I am not going to think about that fiasco right now.

Pace probably should have retired from the Rams instead of heading to Chicago for that 1 yr. But it did spread out the 3 LTs and their run at getting into the Hall.
 

Erebus

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2009
Messages
1,588
Reaction score
5
Location
San Antonio, TX
drdiags":2uz9lbjh said:
RiverDog":2uz9lbjh said:
I don't like calling anyone "best ever" as I don't think it fair to compare players from different eras as the game changes so much, but he was arguably the best of his day, his only real competition coming from Jonathan Ogden, of whom I heard has a similar holding stat.

If Walt doesn't get elected on the first ballot, they need to burn the place down.

Though I have no love lost for division rivals Rams, you have to include Orlando Pace into that trio. I suspect you will see Ogden, Jones and Pace all make it on their first shot at the hall. So far 1 out of 3 with expectations to have 2 out of 3 this year. Pace has always been a concern for me when it came to the HoF and Jones, because of the Superbowl win he had. Out of the 3, Jones chance at the ring went up in smoke in Detroit, but I am not going to think about that fiasco right now.

Pace probably should have retired from the Rams instead of heading to Chicago for that 1 yr. But it did spread out the 3 LTs and their run at getting into the Hall.


Its a good thing only QBs are really judged on Super Bowl rings. As important as the position is, no left tackle was ever the main reason for a team winning the Super Bowl.
 

el capitan

Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2009
Messages
658
Reaction score
0
Without a doubt Walter Jones has to be a first ballot HOFer, looking at the list of semifinalists I don't see anyone who is more deserving than #71.

On a slight tangent, I've always been under the impression that Kenny Easleys short career is the only reason he's not in the Hall of Fame, yet Terrell Davis has been short listed as at least a semifinalist for the last 5 or 6 years even though he played the same number of seasons (7) as Easley.
They both were AllPro 3 times but Easley went to 5 Probowls compared to TD's 3.
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,617
If Jones isn't a first ballot HOF'er, then it just confirms that there's a tremendous east coast bias.

First Team All Rookie
9 Times Pro Bowl
7 Times All Pro
NFL Offensive Lineman of the Year (2005)

/discussion
 

Greenhell

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
3,578
Reaction score
81
Walter getting into the HOF is going to be the icing on the cake of that Super Bowl win. JOY!
 

drdiags

New member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
10,682
Reaction score
1
Location
Kent, Washington
Erebus":1qghsgwb said:
Its a good thing only QBs are really judged on Super Bowl rings. As important as the position is, no left tackle was ever the main reason for a team winning the Super Bowl.

Sure, you can say this. But every time I read the HoF voters talk about a player getting in, the number of championships come into the discussion. It isn't the only thing but I think you are being dismissive if you think there is no weight given to this team-oriented accomplishment. Case in point was the yelling discussion Prime, Faulk and Irvin just had on players that should get in from the current class.

Haley being on 5 Superbowl winning teams and 10 yrs in the probowl was Irvin's case for him getting in. The Superbowls have weight in many players, fans and media's eyes.
 

RiverDog

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
6,175
Reaction score
3,908
Location
Kennewick, WA
drdiags":3pelyffc said:
RiverDog":3pelyffc said:
I don't like calling anyone "best ever" as I don't think it fair to compare players from different eras as the game changes so much, but he was arguably the best of his day, his only real competition coming from Jonathan Ogden, of whom I heard has a similar holding stat.

If Walt doesn't get elected on the first ballot, they need to burn the place down.

Though I have no love lost for division rivals Rams, you have to include Orlando Pace into that trio. I suspect you will see Ogden, Jones and Pace all make it on their first shot at the hall. So far 1 out of 3 with expectations to have 2 out of 3 this year. Pace has always been a concern for me when it came to the HoF and Jones, because of the Superbowl win he had. Out of the 3, Jones chance at the ring went up in smoke in Detroit, but I am not going to think about that fiasco right now.

Pace probably should have retired from the Rams instead of heading to Chicago for that 1 yr. But it did spread out the 3 LTs and their run at getting into the Hall.

I agree. I had forgotten about Pace. He's definitely in that 3 man mix.
 

BlueTalons

New member
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
1,272
Reaction score
0
Location
Spanaway, WA
Walt.jpg
 

HawkWow

New member
Joined
Sep 3, 2012
Messages
6,740
Reaction score
0
Location
The 5-0
RiverDog":2we8kccu said:
drdiags":2we8kccu said:
RiverDog":2we8kccu said:
I don't like calling anyone "best ever" as I don't think it fair to compare players from different eras as the game changes so much, but he was arguably the best of his day, his only real competition coming from Jonathan Ogden, of whom I heard has a similar holding stat.

If Walt doesn't get elected on the first ballot, they need to burn the place down.

Though I have no love lost for division rivals Rams, you have to include Orlando Pace into that trio. I suspect you will see Ogden, Jones and Pace all make it on their first shot at the hall. So far 1 out of 3 with expectations to have 2 out of 3 this year. Pace has always been a concern for me when it came to the HoF and Jones, because of the Superbowl win he had. Out of the 3, Jones chance at the ring went up in smoke in Detroit, but I am not going to think about that fiasco right now.

Pace probably should have retired from the Rams instead of heading to Chicago for that 1 yr. But it did spread out the 3 LTs and their run at getting into the Hall.

I agree. I had forgotten about Pace. He's definitely in that 3 man mix.

In the 3 spot.

I am totally biased. This I know. I feel Walt was better than Ogden, and certainly Pace, but I could be wrong about Ogden. The dude was just so massive.

Thanks for that stat, Southsound hawk. I thought it was 8 but even still, NINE holds in 13 F'N years!?! Crazy. Can you find the number of sacks he allowed? I can't bring it in, but IIRC, it was equally nutz.
 

HawkWow

New member
Joined
Sep 3, 2012
Messages
6,740
Reaction score
0
Location
The 5-0
drdiags":1n7zeb4r said:
Erebus":1n7zeb4r said:
Its a good thing only QBs are really judged on Super Bowl rings. As important as the position is, no left tackle was ever the main reason for a team winning the Super Bowl.

Sure, you can say this. But every time I read the HoF voters talk about a player getting in, the number of championships come into the discussion. It isn't the only thing but I think you are being dismissive if you think there is no weight given to this team-oriented accomplishment. Case in point was the yelling discussion Prime, Faulk and Irvin just had on players that should get in from the current class.

Haley being on 5 Superbowl winning teams and 10 yrs in the probowl was Irvin's case for him getting in. The Superbowls have weight in many players, fans and media's eyes.

What's holding Haley back is that he was basically a psychopath. Great player, but looney as hell and didn't make many friends. Irvin is well aware of this. Besides, when he finally called, he will probably go in as a 9er, despite hard feelings (I would think). OTOH, the way Irvin is clamoring for him, makes me think Haley will go in as a Cowboy. Unsure.

Tim Brown is the one getting the shaft. It's ridiculous he's not already in, despite the number of WRs they have to consider.

Easley? Better than Lott, IMO, or at least as good. But again, I am biased. Lots of bad blood between #45 and our Hawks, unsure if that may hold him back. Makes me sick. Probably my favorite player in the history of the game.
 

Erebus

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2009
Messages
1,588
Reaction score
5
Location
San Antonio, TX
drdiags":12tm9cmz said:
Erebus":12tm9cmz said:
Its a good thing only QBs are really judged on Super Bowl rings. As important as the position is, no left tackle was ever the main reason for a team winning the Super Bowl.

Sure, you can say this. But every time I read the HoF voters talk about a player getting in, the number of championships come into the discussion. It isn't the only thing but I think you are being dismissive if you think there is no weight given to this team-oriented accomplishment. Case in point was the yelling discussion Prime, Faulk and Irvin just had on players that should get in from the current class.

Haley being on 5 Superbowl winning teams and 10 yrs in the probowl was Irvin's case for him getting in. The Superbowls have weight in many players, fans and media's eyes.

It seems to me like having those rings would help someone get in, but a lack of rings shouldn't keep a great player out. He did play in the Super Bowl, so that probably helps a little.

I think a good comparison is Anthony Munoz. He never won a championship, didn't play for a media-hyped team, and made the Hall of Fame on the first ballot. I think Walt was just as good. Hopefully the voters see it that way too.
 

OrFan

Active member
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
3,424
Reaction score
0
drdiags":1zoc5fb7 said:
RiverDog":1zoc5fb7 said:
I don't like calling anyone "best ever" as I don't think it fair to compare players from different eras as the game changes so much, but he was arguably the best of his day, his only real competition coming from Jonathan Ogden, of whom I heard has a similar holding stat.

If Walt doesn't get elected on the first ballot, they need to burn the place down.

Though I have no love lost for division rivals Rams, you have to include Orlando Pace into that trio. I suspect you will see Ogden, Jones and Pace all make it on their first shot at the hall. So far 1 out of 3 with expectations to have 2 out of 3 this year. Pace has always been a concern for me when it came to the HoF and Jones, because of the Superbowl win he had. Out of the 3, Jones chance at the ring went up in smoke in Detroit, but I am not going to think about that fiasco right now.

Pace probably should have retired from the Rams instead of heading to Chicago for that 1 yr. But it did spread out the 3 LTs and their run at getting into the Hall.

Just living proof that the Rams have never been able to keep Pace!

Walter is a shoe in. Dungy is stupid enough as is, I can't wait to see how full of himself he gets with a jacket on.
 

HawkWow

New member
Joined
Sep 3, 2012
Messages
6,740
Reaction score
0
Location
The 5-0
Great call on Munoz. If not for Montana and some nefarious activity by the league's minions, both he and Walt would have their rings.
 

hawksfansinceday1

Active member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
24,629
Reaction score
3
Location
Vancouver, WA
drdiags":1padpbdv said:
......Case in point was the yelling discussion Prime, Faulk and Irvin just had on players that should get in from the current class.......
Good Lord my friend, how do you watch/listen to those three? :pukeface: I do share your lifelong Hawks fan trepidation on Walt's induction though. I think he will get in on the first ballot and obviously he should, but as a Hawk fan there's always that nagging doubt in the back of the mind. The fact that he got screwed out of being in NFLN's top 100 of all-time concerns me as well.
 

drdiags

New member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
10,682
Reaction score
1
Location
Kent, Washington
hawksfansinceday1":nmf9g63e said:
drdiags":nmf9g63e said:
......Case in point was the yelling discussion Prime, Faulk and Irvin just had on players that should get in from the current class.......
Good Lord my friend, how do you watch/listen to those three? :pukeface: I do share your lifelong Hawks fan trepidation on Walt's induction though. I think he will get in on the first ballot and obviously he should, but as a Hawk fan there's always that nagging doubt in the back of the mind. The fact that he got screwed out of being in NFLN's top 100 of all-time concerns me as well.

Trust me. I have the set on mute most time when watching Thursday night games as well as the NFL Network All Access and post game stuff. Those guys are brutal. But ESPN/Fox and NBC are not that much better so what can you do?

Jones HoF enshrinement seems so cut and dry but yeah, that nagging angst of Seahawk-ness keeps me looking for the man behind the curtain. How Jones got left off the all-time top 100 was mind blowing. I had forgot about that fiasco.
 

drdiags

New member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
10,682
Reaction score
1
Location
Kent, Washington
Erebus":3q9774ay said:
I think a good comparison is Anthony Munoz. He never won a championship, didn't play for a media-hyped team, and made the Hall of Fame on the first ballot. I think Walt was just as good. Hopefully the voters see it that way too.

Good call. Munoz was a beast back in the day.
 

sc85sis

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2010
Messages
8,606
Reaction score
1,473
Location
Houston Suburbs
HawkWow":1x7p4ty9 said:
drdiags":1x7p4ty9 said:
Erebus":1x7p4ty9 said:
Its a good thing only QBs are really judged on Super Bowl rings. As important as the position is, no left tackle was ever the main reason for a team winning the Super Bowl.

Sure, you can say this. But every time I read the HoF voters talk about a player getting in, the number of championships come into the discussion. It isn't the only thing but I think you are being dismissive if you think there is no weight given to this team-oriented accomplishment. Case in point was the yelling discussion Prime, Faulk and Irvin just had on players that should get in from the current class.

Haley being on 5 Superbowl winning teams and 10 yrs in the probowl was Irvin's case for him getting in. The Superbowls have weight in many players, fans and media's eyes.

What's holding Haley back is that he was basically a psychopath. Great player, but looney as hell and didn't make many friends. Irvin is well aware of this. Besides, when he finally called, he will probably go in as a 9er, despite hard feelings (I would think). OTOH, the way Irvin is clamoring for him, makes me think Haley will go in as a Cowboy. Unsure.

Tim Brown is the one getting the shaft. It's ridiculous he's not already in, despite the number of WRs they have to consider.

Easley? Better than Lott, IMO, or at least as good. But again, I am biased. Lots of bad blood between #45 and our Hawks, unsure if that may hold him back. Makes me sick. Probably my favorite player in the history of the game.
Wasn't the lawsuit thing smoothed over with the current ownership and Kenny when he was inducted into the Ring of Honor? Paul didn't own the team back when the lawsuit went down.
 

Seahwkgal

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,128
Reaction score
232
drdiags":3oa7lbgx said:
Erebus":3oa7lbgx said:
I think a good comparison is Anthony Munoz. He never won a championship, didn't play for a media-hyped team, and made the Hall of Fame on the first ballot. I think Walt was just as good. Hopefully the voters see it that way too.

Good call. Munoz was a beast back in the day.
Yep. I would call Jones and Munoz equals and the best two LTs that ever played the game. If Walt does not make it this year I will be SHOCKED. :shock:
 

Latest posts

Top