Two catches for 4 yards?

pmedic920

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
33,894
Reaction score
10,445
Location
On the lake, Livingston Texas
And we’re gunna complain?

I know I know, we’re all wanting things to gel 100% 💯 in all phases but……


Our Seahawks just held Jefferson to 4 yards on 2 catches.

If you predicted that I’ll su$k your …..


Just kidding, but “come on man”, that’s pretty cool defensively speaking.


ETA Sidenote

Rams lost, WTF you gunna complain about with a straight face?
 

Frank12

Captain Electron
Joined
Aug 13, 2021
Messages
949
Reaction score
1,012
The defense played great today...

(OK, I'm taking off the Hawks fan glasses now)

Jefferson had an undrafted rookie QB in his first start today throwing him the ball.. I'm just saying 🤷🏻‍♂️... I'm not going to overrate, or underrate anything from this game, all I know is our defense did it's job today...
 
Last edited:

TwistedHusky

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,436
Reaction score
1,592
Our defense did a great job.

BUT

We played a team playing a rookie QB in his first start while having half its OLINE injured. Our defense SHOULD have been dominant.

My concern is not we had any risk of losing this game. My concern was that as bad as their QB was (126yds), our QB was almost as bad (128 yds) without the picks (and you could argue we had 1-2 throws that could have been picks, and he had a fumble).

I am trying to accept that Darnold is our Trent Dilfer, but Trent never put the ball in harm's way like Darnold does. And Trent never seemed to wet himself like Darnold seems to. What we saw today was a QB that looked for all the world like he was wetting himself half the game.

Frankly, Darnold is better than this. We need him to shake this off. He is peeing himself every time he drops back to pass. We needed Darnold to break his anxiety. He can overcome it. But right now his OC is almost as scared of Darnold as Darnold is.

The luxury of literally winning the game despite our offense - won't continue all year.

Still the defense was stellar this game. You are correct.
 
OP
OP
pmedic920

pmedic920

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
33,894
Reaction score
10,445
Location
On the lake, Livingston Texas
Our defense did a great job.

BUT

We played a team playing a rookie QB in his first start while having half its OLINE injured. Our defense SHOULD have been dominant.

My concern is not we had any risk of losing this game. My concern was that as bad as their QB was (126yds), our QB was almost as bad (128 yds) without the picks (and you could argue we had 1-2 throws that could have been picks, and he had a fumble).

I am trying to accept that Darnold is our Trent Dilfer, but Trent never put the ball in harm's way like Darnold does. And Trent never seemed to wet himself like Darnold seems to. What we saw today was a QB that looked for all the world like he was wetting himself half the game.

Frankly, Darnold is better than this. We need him to shake this off. He is peeing himself every time he drops back to pass. We needed Darnold to break his anxiety. He can overcome it. But right now his OC is almost as scared of Darnold as Darnold is.

The luxury of literally winning the game despite our offense - won't continue all year.

Still the defense was stellar this game. You are correct.
Fair but…


Rookie QB or not, JJ was held to 4 yards on 2 catches.

I’ll repeat, 4 yards on 2 catches.

Who woulda thunk ?

JJ is without a doubt their best weapon on offense.

Great team win, D played lights out.

Find anyone anywhere that predicted the Jefferson stat, and I’ll send you a 6er of whatever you enjoy.
 

glenwo2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2025
Messages
6,235
Reaction score
7,244
Our defense did a great job.

BUT

We played a team playing a rookie QB in his first start while having half its OLINE injured. Our defense SHOULD have been dominant.

My concern is not we had any risk of losing this game. My concern was that as bad as their QB was (126yds), our QB was almost as bad (128 yds) without the picks (and you could argue we had 1-2 throws that could have been picks, and he had a fumble).

I am trying to accept that Darnold is our Trent Dilfer, but Trent never put the ball in harm's way like Darnold does. And Trent never seemed to wet himself like Darnold seems to. What we saw today was a QB that looked for all the world like he was wetting himself half the game.

Frankly, Darnold is better than this. We need him to shake this off. He is peeing himself every time he drops back to pass. We needed Darnold to break his anxiety. He can overcome it. But right now his OC is almost as scared of Darnold as Darnold is.

The luxury of literally winning the game despite our offense - won't continue all year.

Still the defense was stellar this game. You are correct.


Wasn't the original idea behind acquiring Darnold was to rely on the Defense and the Running game?

Now that we have an example of what we envisioned, the sky is falling because Darnold isn't playing like an MVP candidate anymore?


Look at it this way :

Brian Flores knew Darnold inside-and-out.

So it was expected that Darnold would have some trouble, though admittedly I underestimated just how much he would struggle.

Still, though, he once again threw ZERO picks.

And please stop with the "he almost threw 1-2 picks" nonsense.

Hey...I *almost* won the lottery after picking 1 out of 6 numbers last night! 🤪


There aren't any boxscore stats for Almost-picks, man.

Almost-picks are Incomplete Passes. That's it.


This team is not built to be a QB-Driven team.

That Darnold made it seem that way for awhile was a great bonus.

But this was vintage Seahawks football : DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE (with some Running Attacks mixed in).
 

TwistedHusky

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,436
Reaction score
1,592
Wasn't the original idea behind acquiring Darnold was to rely on the Defense and the Running game?

Now that we have an example of what we envisioned, the sky is falling because Darnold isn't playing like an MVP candidate anymore?


Look at it this way :

Brian Flores knew Darnold inside-and-out.

So it was expected that Darnold would have some trouble, though admittedly I underestimated just how much he would struggle.

Still, though, he once again threw ZERO picks.

And please stop with the "he almost threw 1-2 picks" nonsense.

Hey...I *almost* won the lottery after picking 1 out of 6 numbers last night! 🤪


There aren't any boxscore stats for Almost-picks, man.

Almost-picks are Incomplete Passes. That's it.


This team is not built to be a QB-Driven team.

That Darnold made it seem that way for awhile was a great bonus.

But this was vintage Seahawks football : DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE (with some Running Attacks mixed in).
Sorry. Disagree.

If you repeatedly put the ball in the defender's hands...and he drops it, that is a warning. You got away with one.
But good teams will catch those, often at the worst times. WHICH LITERALLY HAPPENED IN THE RAMS GAME....REPEATEDLY.

So no. Darnold cannot be our Trent Dilfer (the bus driver QB you alluded to). He puts the ball in harm's way too much for that. We have to find a way to throw it long and limit the poor decisions Darnold makes under pressure. Darnold is not a 'game manager' type.

Frankly, while Darnold is not as good as he was earlier in this year...he isn't as bad as he has been lately either. We needed this to be a 'get right game' for Darnold. But instead our gameplan seemed to win by limiting Darnold. Would have been better to let Darnold make some mistakes, shake his funk, and let the Defense cover for his mistake.

We won. But we likely would have won either way. The problem is, we haven't fixed the issue with Darnold - and against better opponents it won't go this way (again, watch the Rams game)
 

glenwo2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2025
Messages
6,235
Reaction score
7,244
And JSN still had way more yards than Jefferson.
 

Azvacar

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 7, 2025
Messages
1,279
Reaction score
1,011
Wasn't the original idea behind acquiring Darnold was to rely on the Defense and the Running game?

Now that we have an example of what we envisioned, the sky is falling because Darnold isn't playing like an MVP candidate anymore?


Look at it this way :

Brian Flores knew Darnold inside-and-out.

So it was expected that Darnold would have some trouble, though admittedly I underestimated just how much he would struggle.

Still, though, he once again threw ZERO picks.

And please stop with the "he almost threw 1-2 picks" nonsense.

Hey...I *almost* won the lottery after picking 1 out of 6 numbers last night! 🤪


There aren't any boxscore stats for Almost-picks, man.

Almost-picks are Incomplete Passes. That's it.


This team is not built to be a QB-Driven team.

That Darnold made it seem that way for awhile was a great bonus.

But this was vintage Seahawks football : DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE (with some Running Attacks mixed in).
His struggle was.. that Bradford needs to be benched and is terrible... Our TE seems to suck in Pass protection or dont understand the concepts... and Kubiak has to wait till locker room time to adjust the play calling to counter the pass rush.

I was fine with how he did, with how little time he had and how bad our blocking was today in pass protection

Sports Illustrated quip:

"In Sam Darnold's defense, it's tough to do anything good when you're getting pass protection like he got today from Seattle's starting offensive line. As per usual, right guard Anthony Bradford was the worst offender, but nobody really covered themselves in glory blocking against Brian Flores' blitzes. In the end, Darnold took four sacks, five QB hits and a lot more pressures."
 
Last edited:

strohmin

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
2,496
Reaction score
1,683
Wasn't the original idea behind acquiring Darnold was to rely on the Defense and the Running game?

Now that we have an example of what we envisioned, the sky is falling because Darnold isn't playing like an MVP candidate anymore?


Look at it this way :

Brian Flores knew Darnold inside-and-out.

So it was expected that Darnold would have some trouble, though admittedly I underestimated just how much he would struggle.

Still, though, he once again threw ZERO picks.

And please stop with the "he almost threw 1-2 picks" nonsense.

Hey...I *almost* won the lottery after picking 1 out of 6 numbers last night! 🤪


There aren't any boxscore stats for Almost-picks, man.

Almost-picks are Incomplete Passes. That's it.


This team is not built to be a QB-Driven team.

That Darnold made it seem that way for awhile was a great bonus.

But this was vintage Seahawks football : DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE (with some Running Attacks mixed in).
Can't agree with this enough. Sam should not be expected to play like a Josh Allen or Joe Burrow. He needs to just move the ball like an average QB taking advantage of our explosive playmakers and play the field position game for the defense. The offense just needs to play for this defense because they are that good. Other than the Rams game, he's played much better than I expected.
 

Hawkstud

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2025
Messages
290
Reaction score
363
Sorry. Disagree.

If you repeatedly put the ball in the defender's hands...and he drops it, that is a warning. You got away with one.
But good teams will catch those, often at the worst times. WHICH LITERALLY HAPPENED IN THE RAMS GAME....REPEATEDLY.

So no. Darnold cannot be our Trent Dilfer (the bus driver QB you alluded to). He puts the ball in harm's way too much for that. We have to find a way to throw it long and limit the poor decisions Darnold makes under pressure. Darnold is not a 'game manager' type.

Frankly, while Darnold is not as good as he was earlier in this year...he isn't as bad as he has been lately either. We needed this to be a 'get right game' for Darnold. But instead our gameplan seemed to win by limiting Darnold. Would have been better to let Darnold make some mistakes, shake his funk, and let the Defense cover for his mistake.

We won. But we likely would have won either way. The problem is, we haven't fixed the issue with Darnold - and against better opponents it won't go this way (again, watch the Rams game)
LOL I did watch the Rams game yesterday, and I saw a crazy good Matt Stafford get Pass-Happy and throw his first TWO PICKS of the season and lose the game because of it.
A thank you to the Panthers for giving MM & KK some game film to study.
 

Latest posts

Top