olyfan63
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2012
- Messages
- 6,168
- Reaction score
- 2,276
Fade":3dgoxi9r said:...At the price he cost the Lions, 5 yrs @ $31M. When the Seahawks had no problem handing money out to bums like Cary Williams, Luke Joeckel, Eddy Lacey, etc.
Letting Tate walk made no sense from a football perspective. His cap number in yr 1 with Detroit was $3.1M. The Seahawks could've easily afforded it. The upcoming draft was loaded with receiving talent though, so they thought they could save money, and fill the position that way. They drafted Paul Richardson.
Fade, thank you for the excellent data point on Tate. This just further confirms that there were other factors in play for Tate's departure. I just though it was because he wasn't tough enough against Percy Harvin, and didn't block Harvin's sucker punch the night before SB48. I mean, Seattle receivers have to be TOUGH. Tate De-Cleating Sean Lee was nice, but insufficient, and when he showed up soft against Harvin, the ending was written right there. Or maybe it was from showing up hard and bringing the wood in another setting. One of the two. I think it may have been the second one.
Sure enjoyed seeing Tate's play while he was here. Seeing him make tacklers miss, a RB at the WR position. Not to mention, every off-season there were threads about how Tate had gotten fat and out of shape and didn't even look like a football player. Then he would ball out that next season and prove the naysayers were full of it.