JSeahawks
Well-known member
bigtrain21":1j6bafki said:Ha ha. So I don't follow recruiting too much until a week or so before signing day. I do read about kids if they sign and check in every once in awhile. I admit I didn't know what a non-commitable offer was until I googled it. How do you know it was non-commitable and why would taggart have non-commitable offers out there this early in the process? Non-commitable or not, Taggart was interested.
It's interesting, UW and UO right now are just about complete opposites in recruiting philosophies. Under Chris Petersen the Huskies are very selective in who they offer. They will pretty much only offer guys if they're ready to accept a commitment from them (under Chip Kelly and Mark Helfrich the Ducks were the same way). To be honest, its a much more ethical way of recruiting.
Under Taggart the Ducks are taking more of a shot gun approach to recruiting, and they play "the game" a little bit more.
They have thrown out 100's of offers, probably 3 or 4 times more than UW has. Some of those kids will get offered then hardly even be recruited. Some will get offered and be in constant communication with the coaching staff, but will be slow played and pushed back if they try and commit. Its a way of keeping back up options if things fall through with the top targets. That's the category that Ale fell in with the ducks.
Right now Oregon has 21 commits and probably room for 7 or 8 more. They have offers out to about 300 kids all across the country but there are probably only about 15-20 who they are actively recruiting and would accept commits from. I know of at least 3 kids with offers who have tried to commit but have been told thanks but no thanks. Its kind of slimy and unethical, but its recruiting.