uncle fester
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2010
- Messages
- 1,556
- Reaction score
- 300
If he plays like today, you pay him and find away to maneuver other money around.
Was coming here to say exactly the same.
Unbelievable performance.
If he plays like today, you pay him and find away to maneuver other money around.
nanomoz":2rw5d69r said:And they schemed to use him. Surprised me. Kam and Earl had two sacks combine in their Hawks careers.
mikeak":2ssufusu said:HawkerD":2ssufusu said:mikeak":2ssufusu said:It settles NOTHING
Most of us perplexed by the trade were not arguing that he isn't an all-star.
We were arguing that he will likely sit out after this year if he isn't given a massive contract and we question if Seattle will. The value of the trade is dependent on his play AND an extension being agreed upon
if not a payday for this guy then who? He will get paid by the hawks if he stays healthy this year. He will set the bar for safety.
I am not arguing that he shouldn't be paid. I am questioning if Seattle will pay him what he wants. They do hold the upper hand by his fifth year option and threat of a franchise tag so hopefully that works.
My only point is when you trade away two first rounders for a guy on year 4 of his contract then the situation is more complex than just his level of play
Rat":1752b9xg said:Speaking of that trade, it looks like McDougald had a solid debut for the Jets, at least statistically: 8 tackles with a pass deflection and a fumble recovery. Good for him.
Although Josh Allen had, by far, the most passing yards of his career, so it's possible he wasn't great in coverage. I'll have to get a Jets fan opinion on that, as I did not watch the game.
Appyhawk":3qlgc29n said:Why would anyone choose RAT for their username?
Jerhawk":expgsjaj said:He was a lot of fun to watch. He was incredibly disruptive and came as advertised.
However, like discussed earlier, the worry is having him long term, not just a rental.
Mad Dog":124rn55i said:Jerhawk":124rn55i said:He was a lot of fun to watch. He was incredibly disruptive and came as advertised.
However, like discussed earlier, the worry is having him long term, not just a rental.
Admittedly we could have him for 4 years between rookie contract and franchise tags if we wanted to. But I think we'll work out an agreement if he keeps playing like this. No desire for malcontents if we can avoid it.