hawknation2015":1xvkllcd said:Other than Britt and 6th Rounder Garrett Scott, who never suited up due to a heart condition, the Seahawks did NOT draft a single offensive lineman above the 7th Round from 2012-2014, including zero in the 2012 and 2013 draft classes. Britt remains the only lineman we have drafted above the 4th Round in the last four years (2012-2015).
If we had devoted any real draft capital to the position group in 2012 or 2013, then we would be working with more third and fourth year linemen. But instead of working with experienced draftees, we are now forced to develop undrafted free agents into major contributors: Garry Gilliam, Drew Nowak, and Alvin Bailey. That is an extremely difficult thing to do.
The benefits I have already discussed, because it meant using that draft capital on other position groups and using those cap savings on re-signing our most elite players, instead of chasing free agent linemen.
That said, I do wish we had drafted a couple more linemen in the first three rounds since 2012. The 2013 and 2014 draft classes did not turn out that great anyway, and elite linemen prospects like Joel Bitonio were available. They could have taken Bitionio instead of Paul Richardson or Larry Warford instead of Christine Michael.
justafan":2vnyouy2 said:hawknation2015":2vnyouy2 said:Other than Britt and 6th Rounder Garrett Scott, who never suited up due to a heart condition, the Seahawks did NOT draft a single offensive lineman above the 7th Round from 2012-2014, including zero in the 2012 and 2013 draft classes. Britt remains the only lineman we have drafted above the 4th Round in the last four years (2012-2015).
If we had devoted any real draft capital to the position group in 2012 or 2013, then we would be working with more third and fourth year linemen. But instead of working with experienced draftees, we are now forced to develop undrafted free agents into major contributors: Garry Gilliam, Drew Nowak, and Alvin Bailey. That is an extremely difficult thing to do.
The benefits I have already discussed, because it meant using that draft capital on other position groups and using those cap savings on re-signing our most elite players, instead of chasing free agent linemen.
That said, I do wish we had drafted a couple more linemen in the first three rounds since 2012. The 2013 and 2014 draft classes did not turn out that great anyway, and elite linemen prospects like Joel Bitonio were available. They could have taken Bitionio instead of Paul Richardson or Larry Warford instead of Christine Michael.
What I said is our Olines prior to this year was built with high draft picks and decent FAs.It was a priority with the FO.I agree with everyone that the reason this line is so bad is because its built with poor players with little or no experience.
They chased glamour players like Harvin and Graham at the expense of the Oline.Probably two of the most overated positions in football IMO are high priced WRs and finesse TEs.
But it sounds like people accept it or use it as an excuse for building a poor line.Building the Oline this way was the mistake.That's my point.I'm not sure how anyone can argue its the smart way to go about it.I think its part of Cables ego.
Every year we should be drafting Olineman.You replace part of the line every year.Its something every team does at some point.
There were very few people here who wanted Bitonio in the 1st that year.
We've seen very little of him. He actually had moments, I believe in the Carolina game. He had a play where he blew a guy up, and hustled down the field to get another guy as the runner made his way down field. Then two plays later he got blown past.Vesuve":gmrvxwbv said:OK so.....
No ones has thoughts on Alvin Bailey being just plain bad?
FlyingGreg":pk58tgpr said:We need to stop drafting D line types and trying to convert them to O line.
Once is a novelty. Now its just silly.
Laloosh":3tzdk78r said:FlyingGreg":3tzdk78r said:We need to stop drafting D line types and trying to convert them to O line.
Once is a novelty. Now its just silly.
It's weird because I totally get this, yet we're the #1 rushing offense in the league... behind a terrible OL. It's surreal.
DavidSeven":2qo0el39 said:Laloosh":2qo0el39 said:FlyingGreg":2qo0el39 said:We need to stop drafting D line types and trying to convert them to O line.
Once is a novelty. Now its just silly.
It's weird because I totally get this, yet we're the #1 rushing offense in the league... behind a terrible OL. It's surreal.
Take out Russ's rushing yardage, and we're closer to the middle of the pack.
ATL, ARI, NYJ, PITT...those teams are run blocking a lot better than us in conventional setups, and I think most observers would agree on that. But our numbers will always get inflated with Russ running around.
Attyla the Hawk":32lr6vix said:Honestly though, I don't think you can divorce Wilson from the equation.
We scheme the runs around Wilson's ability. The fact that defenses have to account for him affects the rushing opportunities for the RBs. And in order to maintain that effect, Wilson has to rush at times to maintain the threat.
If we didn't have a mobile QB, we'd run different plays with different personnel groups. And probably opt to value a blocking TE more than we currently do.
The plays and scheme do go hand in hand with the strengths of the players we have.
leto69":m4yxr2jv said:Cable has been consistently regarded Sweeney as even the best Guard in the NFL this year and last year. Cable in my opinion over estimates his ability to convert DL to OL to be effective and be able to call them average is a stretch. How he evaluates OL talent is beyond my understanding. But the fact that he continues to endorse them as great player has to make one wonder if he is still coaching here because Pot is legal in Washington.
Is Sweeney the 2nd best line man we have, yes but that isn't saying much. Okung is the best we have however he is not better than a average tackle. Britt has made no strides, and Gilliam was practice squad last year. The Nowak experiment finally came to a end thank god after 4 preseason and 6 regular season games. Way to much time to invest in a player with no potential.
Laloosh":aucthnxy said:leto69":aucthnxy said:Cable has been consistently regarded Sweeney as even the best Guard in the NFL this year and last year. Cable in my opinion over estimates his ability to convert DL to OL to be effective and be able to call them average is a stretch. How he evaluates OL talent is beyond my understanding. But the fact that he continues to endorse them as great player has to make one wonder if he is still coaching here because Pot is legal in Washington.
Is Sweeney the 2nd best line man we have, yes but that isn't saying much. Okung is the best we have however he is not better than a average tackle. Britt has made no strides, and Gilliam was practice squad last year. The Nowak experiment finally came to a end thank god after 4 preseason and 6 regular season games. Way to much time to invest in a player with no potential.
Who is this Sweeney that you speak of?
Also, Nowak is starting this week. Once Lewis recovers from injury, they will battle it out for the spot (as Pete said).
hawknation2015":1qvcnvsd said:Lewis is back from injury . . . they were competing on Thursday and Friday. Carroll would not say who would be starting at center.