dogorama":3urz4vcv said:
FlyHawksFly":3urz4vcv said:
dogorama":3urz4vcv said:
You would have to do it compared to the rest of the league if they had comparable running quarterbacks but there are only three or four comparable in the entire league and yes, their rushing stats are skewed too. But don't take my word for it look for yourself and remember last year was a low year for RW, the year before he had 900 yds.
http://www.fftoday.com/stats/playerstats.php
Of the top running teams by yardage, 6-7 have QBs in the top ten in QB rushing yards. You are proving my point.
The point I am trying to make is that Russell Wilson is completely unique in this league, there are other QB's in the league that run for yds but there aren't any QB's who have his scrambling ability, not even close. The point is he gets lots of yds off of broken plays, namely passing plays. The yds he gets have nothing to do w/run blocking because it's a passing play and the linemen can't block downfield because they would be called for illegal receiver downfield. The yds probably shouldn't even be included in rushing yds.
And my point is, you are completely ignoring other team's non-designed running totals. If you think guys like Fitzpatrick and Alex smith are taking more designed runs than Wilson, I would suggest maybe you watch more football.
While making relative evaluations, you must level the field. Taking away a portion of one team's rushing totals but not another is either a) disingenuous or b) a failed attempt at making a cogent point. Either you take away all non designed runs or you don't. Picking and choosing which teams we subtract yardage from to prove a point about blocking ability really just shows us your own opinion about the situation, as it isn't a substantive or fair evaluation.