OrangeGravy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2016
- Messages
- 1,209
- Reaction score
- 385
My question would be what does improvement look like in that scenario, keeping Russ with a new coach? I would think it would have to be at a minimum, 10-12 wins and winning at least 1 playoff game every season. That's objectively better than what we've been since 2014. That would be the cut-off. As long as people stuck to that expectation and evaluated the coaches accordingly, I'd have no problem with it. I do suspect that a lot of people will start moving the goalposts when we don't live up to that standard on the field. I don't think that standard is easily met no matter who is coaching even if Russell is here.TwistedHusky":ux05fl5s said:No because the blueprint that Pete pioneered works. You don't need him to run it.
It is counterintuitive. But if you follow it, you have a team full of pro-bowlers within 3-5 years.
Even if Wilson leaves, that is true.
The problem is that Pete no longer follows his blueprint. In fact, he cannot.
Whether it is worth losing Wilson to jettison Pete? That is a hard one. Probably. But the whole point of getting rid of Pete is to see what another coach can do with Wilson. Pete is not a good coach, so just with Wilson - you should see some improvement.
What I can say for sure, is that if you keep Pete AND get rid of Wilson that is the worst possible outcome. We would literally be better with any other coach in the NFL, no hyperbole. Because Pete will not only lose, but mortgage your future on failed bets - delaying your recovery.