Seahawks vs Saints Preview

hawk79

New member
Joined
Aug 12, 2013
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
Decent write up but your sentence structure was hard to read. Need to work on your puncuation if you're going to be a writer and use spell check.
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
44,065
Reaction score
28,115
Location
Sammamish, WA
Grammar police? really? Come on man. Keep doing your thing Burgers, good stuff.
 

Hawks46

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
7,498
Reaction score
0
SoulfishHawk":2kdv6z6s said:
Grammar police? really? Come on man. Keep doing your thing Burgers, good stuff.

Umm, yeah. It's one thing to police a guy's post on a forum, it's another to point out spelling errors, grammatical errors and sentence structuring flaws to a guy trying to write an online article. It's contstructive criticism, it's not meant to be negative. People need to stop being so damned sensitive.

Good write up Burgers, but I have a question: where did you hear that Thurmond was talking about signing an extension at $5mil/year and now it's lowered to 1-2 ? Just curious as that's a very good contract for us.
 

Seahawkfan80

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
12,901
Reaction score
1,813
Just a couple of Questions. Do you think Michael will play in the return role? Where did the pic on the top of your page come from? I am curious.
 
OP
OP
burgers_59

burgers_59

New member
Joined
Oct 24, 2010
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Location
Missoula, MT/ Snohomish, WA
Thanks for the feedback guys, I go kind of comma crazy lol.

As for the Thurmond info, Michael Silver had a quick writeup about the negotiations. Also bleacher report had an excerpt of it . I agree that it's definitely a discount price, hopefully he doesn't go elsewhere for more money.

Christine Michael should be a good return specialist but I think they're going to continue to use Kearse. Wouldn't be surprised to see Michael as a returner by the end of the season or playoffs though. I got the picture from Creative Commons when I looked up, "Pacific Northwest".
 

drdiags

New member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
10,682
Reaction score
1
Location
Kent, Washington
Quick note. Browner's current appeal is for substance abuse so when you mention that this is his second failure in two separate areas I am assuming you are tying the performance enhancement suspension with this current one in appeal. If so, that would not be correct.
 
OP
OP
burgers_59

burgers_59

New member
Joined
Oct 24, 2010
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Location
Missoula, MT/ Snohomish, WA
drdiags":9rslycin said:
Quick note. Browner's current appeal is for substance abuse so when you mention that this is his second failure in two separate areas I am assuming you are tying the performance enhancement suspension with this current one in appeal. If so, that would not be correct.

That's not what I was trying to say, but I see how you might've got that. Apparently the NFL is trying him for a failed substance test that he took back when he was in the CFL. Which seems a bit odd to me.
 

Latest posts

Top