gowazzu02":tbqtvzi1 said:
You do not get a Richard Sherman or a Russel Wilson or a Kam Chancellor with out as you call it "getting cute"
You think any of those guys were first round stud , no need to work and mold players?
Is the front office perfect? No. But find me one that is perfect? Actually find me one thats better then ours? Ill wait
You focused your reply on what I said worked when we had a different team. A much weaker team that gave us time to mold and work on players
When we were drafting players that needed to try to find a spot on a very solid and star studded roster we should have tried to get fewer guys that we could stash and that had a high upside.
The philosophy when having a weak roster is get a lot of guys and lets train them up
The philosophy when having a really strong roster is get fewer guys but hopefully better average and ability to give them playing time to turn them into stars
Example is 2013 draft with many of those actually being good picks but we didn't have the place for them on the roster. Who didn't want Spencer Ware last season for example? We just didn't have room for him to prove it in 2013. So why go get a bunch of guys if they aren't going to have the time and learning required to see if they can make it........