Sando Vs. Blount

[KitsapHawk]

Which one, and why?

To put it blountly( :lol: ), Blount has just sucked imo.

 

[cacksman]

I voted Blount because this is a ridiculous poll. No one in their right mind would prefer him to Sando.

 

[KitsapHawk]

I voted Blount because this is a ridiculous poll. No one in their right mind would prefer him to Sando.

:34853_doh:

 

[McGruff]

If you are looking for seldom posted derivative articles filled with unoriginal thought and 7th grade writing, Blount is the way to go.

Oddly enough, he's a good interview, but his writing is atrocious.

 

[Axx]

I voted Blount because this is a ridiculous poll. No one in their right mind would prefer him to Sando.

what do you expect from a zoidberg?

 

[rsm650]

You can't really compare him to Sando. Sando was so good that he got promoted to write some deep insider stuff or something. So we're not getting him back any time soon.

 

[McGruff]

You can't really compare him to Sando. Sando was so good that he got promoted to write some deep insider stuff or something. So we're not getting him back any time soon.

Finned, compared to every other blog writer in the NFC West nation he sucks and the Seahawks fans got royally jobbed.

 

[Tical21]

Shocker, I know, that I'm against the norm, but I like Blount. Sando is overrated IMO. Doesn't have much original thought, pretty basic reporter. He's very reliable at it, but that is all he does. When he tried his hand at being an analyst, he points out the obvious and misses the main hidden points.

 

[davidonmi]

sando, not even close

 

[jkitsune]

Wow, I really thought for a few seconds that this was comparing the running back to the writer, and was incredibly confused. I'm dense tonight.

Sando, no doubt.

 

[SupersonicSeahawkz]

Blount knows more about his last name and his cone head dog, then the seahawks

 

[seahawksny]

Dont like either. Sando has NO personality whatsoever

 

[HawkGA]

Shocker, I know, that I'm against the norm, but I like Blount. Sando is overrated IMO. Doesn't have much original thought, pretty basic reporter. He's very reliable at it, but that is all he does. When he tried his hand at being an analyst, he points out the obvious and misses the main hidden points.

And Blount has what redeeming qualities exactly?

 

[Pandion Haliaetus]

Do Browner and Thurmond aka Cheech and Chong of the Legion of Bong vote for both. Sando sounds like stoner munchies slang and Blount is an "o" away of getting smoked.

 

[Blitzer88]

Sando by a mile.

 

[Ad Hawk]

I used to actually read the articles on ESPN blog because Sando's stats and comparisons of NFC player-positions was fun to see.

Now? Meh; rather hum-drum, be honest. I feel that I can get more "news" here, and rarely is anything posted there first now.

 

[RobBaker7714409]

Blount is a hayseed. Zero original thought. I can watch a Pete Carroll interview on seahawks.com if I want to get an exact recap of the days events. Burn him!

 

[Brahn]

Sando knew the team, Blount is still learning what we are about and what Seattle fans want to read about. We just need to give it time, I think many people are just upset over change. It is human nature to hate the non familiar.

 

[SeaTown81]

What's a shame is that Eric Williams left the Tacoma News Tribune and took the ESPN blog gig to cover the Chargers. He would've been a much better choice.

 

[FargoHawk]

Sando vs Blount = Carroll vs Mora