Robinson Cano fires Scott Boras, signs with Jay Z

[JSeahawks]

If there aint no love in the city, we'll see if he's still in an empire state of mind when its time to re-up. Cuz its a hard knock life and the Yankees got 99 problems but Cano aint one.

http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/blog/eye-o ... zs-company

 

[pehawk]

If there aint no love in the city, we'll see if he's still in an empire state of mind when its time to re-up. Cuz its a hard knock life and the Yankees got 99 problems but Cano aint one.

http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/blog/eye-o ... zs-company

Shhhh. Please don't, J.

 

[JSeahawks]

If there aint no love in the city, we'll see if he's still in an empire state of mind when its time to re-up. Cuz its a hard knock life and the Yankees got 99 problems but Cano aint one.

http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/blog/eye-o ... zs-company

Shhhh. Please don't, J.

Fo'rizzle?

 

[jhawk91]

If there aint no love in the city, we'll see if he's still in an empire state of mind when its time to re-up. Cuz its a hard knock life and the Yankees got 99 problems but Cano aint one.

http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/blog/eye-o ... zs-company

We really need a like button on this site

 

[TheRealDTM]

HOVA

 

[GCrow]

Victor Cruz has now signed up with Hov. Lets see if he can get him the money he wants.

http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/sports ... port-says/

 

[Throwdown]

My question is, can Jay-Z represent NBA players, seeing as he's part owner of the Nets?

 

[Matticus]

My question is, can Jay-Z represent NBA players, seeing as he's part owner of the Nets?

He's either selling or has already sold his shares of the team in order to pursue this. They were saying this might be a bad thing for the nets, might be harder to lure FA's now as him being a part owner was a major selling point.

 

[GCrow]

My question is, can Jay-Z represent NBA players, seeing as he's part owner of the Nets?

He's either selling or has already sold his shares of the team in order to pursue this. They were saying this might be a bad thing for the nets, might be harder to lure FA's now as him being a part owner was a major selling point.

Lulz. Shouldn't.
The dude owned .15 of 1% stake in the team, or roughly $350,000. The only reason he was given that was to suck up to Lebron in attempts to get him to come to Brooklyn. Needless to say, that didn't exactly work out. Besides, they have a reckless multi billionare owner who dosen't care what he spends (hence why their paying about 50M in luxury tax this season) who will overpay & throw however much money he feels necessary to get a player.

 

[Throwdown]

He owned part of the nets WELL before the LeBron fiasco.