Riq Woolen controversy. (Poll)

[pmedic920]

BirdsCommaAngry

www.seahawks.net

That will answer any question you might have as to the seriousness of his stance.

Yea I’m aware of the trend.

My issue is that I believe one should be willing /able to discuss/ defend takes that go afar from what most would consider legitimate or reasonable.

 

[stack55]

My patriot rooting friend was upset how bad the hawks dominated.

He said it looked like the JV playing the varsity.

 

[flv2]

I wouldn't want him as a starter at $10M. I know he can play but defense relies on teamwork first and Woolen is an individual first. He can make great individual plays but he undermines the team ethos. It's not a trade-off i'd want to make on a contending team - at that price. I'd consider him as a back-up at a much lower price, but obviously there's no reason for him to consider such an option. A fresh start is good for both him and the Seahawks.

 

[Gametime]

MM’s defense is a machine that requires fluidity, intelligence, and selfless play. There was one player who, multiple times last season, didn’t fit that. A player can be athletic and talented and be a terrible fit in terms of attitude and scheme. He may do well in Philly but he was always going to stand out in this defense for all the wrong reasons. We won the SB because the team was built of believers. I don’t think Reek ever truly bought in.

 

[onanygivensunday]

Woolen played like a knucklehead at times last year... way too often for Mike and John.