Basis4day
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 5,924
- Reaction score
- 0
53 players (and only 46 suited players) has never seemed like enough roster spots to me.
So many players are hurt during the year that it seems better for competition purposes to have larger rosters on each team so backups at least practice and know the schemes they're expected to employ on Sundays.
Other than money implications, what reasons are there for not expanding the active roster with an according salary cap adjustment?
I'm not talking college level rosters, but say 53 suited players and 60 active roster spots.
Thoughts?
So many players are hurt during the year that it seems better for competition purposes to have larger rosters on each team so backups at least practice and know the schemes they're expected to employ on Sundays.
Other than money implications, what reasons are there for not expanding the active roster with an according salary cap adjustment?
I'm not talking college level rosters, but say 53 suited players and 60 active roster spots.
Thoughts?