HansGruber":9nvf8cfl said:
I'm not arguing with anyone, Pe. I'm openly laughing at the people on this forum who think they can watch a broadcast of a professional football game on TV, and think that makes them an expert on professional football scouting, coaching and management.
It is literally the equivalent of some stoner watching a heart surgery on cable TV, and then pontificating to their elderly father on why he shouldn't have that triple bypass. Never mind your cardiologist... I watch cable TV, I'm an expert!!
Simple fact - you and Scotte and everyone else on this forum doesn't have the slightest shred of knowledge about our players or how they perform, or how they will be graded by the coaching staff. Sure, you know when someone's really good (Wilson) or really bad (Whitehurst). But outside of those very extremes, you literally don't know anything. And it's hilarious listening to you guys pontificate as if you really do know what you're talking about. As if you are qualified to comment on any contract. You don't speak to the agents, you don't speak to the coaches, you don't speak to the scouts. You don't have the first clue what that player's value is, and it's hilariously pretentious to even pretend that you do. Especially when you add the passive-agressive attempts at martyrdom.
I'll be excited about the signing because Pete Carroll is excited about it. Pete Carroll has won multiple championships at multiple levels of the sport. He will be in the Hall of Fame. People will talk about his greatness 50 years after his death. You are a random nobody on the internet. I'll stick with the people who get paid for their expertise, and that doesn't include anyone on this forum.
This is the worst argument I have ever heard, and I live with a woman.
ALL front offices are full of professionals, yet bad decisions and bad contracts are given all the time. Sometimes everybody knows a decision is ludicrous as it's being made - people openly laughed as the Panther signed two RBs to huge extensions, which have turned out to cripple that team.
You know who else had won multiple championships? Joe Gibbs. And he came back from retirement, standing on the sideline making "broom broom" racecar noises and pretending to look at a clipboard during games, and if you want to say that no one could question what he did with Washington on his second go round then, well, I don't know how to answer that. No one gets a pass in this life, and although I will always trust Pete and John over my own thinking, doesn't mean I won't raise an eyebrow now and again.
Front offices are full of humans, and humans are not always rational. I agree that our FO seems to be free of ego (think Harvin, Lendale White, quite a few 4th round picks dropped in training camp, etc), so that is a comfort. Would I put it passed them to be too generous to a player they value highly due to a mix of loyalty and appreciation? No.
We don't know the true numbers of the contract, or how it is structured, so nobody really knows how this contract looks. However, if the earlier tweet from Davis Hsu is correct and KJ would have signed for less, then by definition the contract is sub-optimal. Also, they are probably overpaying by today's values, but they are presumably trying to anticipate next year's "price" in the OLB market. We may get to next year and find that teams are looking to spend on QB, WR, DE and CB, and cannot be bothered spending on OLBs when they are reasonably fungible and a lot of teams spend more than 50% of the time in nickel anyway. People get markets wrong all the time.
Are we wailing and rending our garments whilst burning our jerseys? No. Just expressing some initial surprise. I posted just yesterday that I thought KJ would be allowed to leave and they would roll with Irvin, Wags and KPL as starters next year, so I am especially surprised.
I've expressed my surprise, and now I will move on to something else. But in order to be consistent, you must agree to never question any decision made in the future if it is made by a professional. Deal?