theENGLISHseahawk--
Fine to drop it, so last response, and you are of course free to take the last word.
theENGLISHseahawk":1vezwmt6 said:
Popeyejones":1vezwmt6 said:
Just for clarification, I love Sherman as a player obviously, and I also find his "antics" hilarious (him clearly being a really smart guy makes it even easier to like him). And as for Rice, I don't really care about him either way. He had a good season once and he spun a ball. Who cares? Seems like you want to make what I said something it isn't?
Nope... in fact I don't even know why we're talking about Sherman and Rice.
You said "it's great to know you're really annoyed by Sherman and Rice" and I clarified that I really, really like Sherman and am completely nonplussed by Rice. As your claim was that I was really annoyed by them, it seemed that you wanted to make what I said something it wasn't. That was all. Happy to drop it.
theENGLISHseahawk":1vezwmt6 said:
What should they do? Challenge him on it. I'm a journalist. If anyone ever spoke to me like that in an interview, I wouldn't just keep asking questions like everything's cool. We have a way of doing things over here. Keep asking the same question until you get a proper answer. You'll be surprised how often that tactic works.
Three quick things:
1) This is why I asked for links to the local Seattle beat reporters holding the Hawks' feet to the fire and not accepting platitudinous answers. Nobody has given me an example yet. Maybe they're there. If not, I think you might be mistaking a larger problem in sports journalism with something specific.
2) It seems You were expecting beat reporters to get bully with Harbaugh in a pre-game press conference? Have you ever seen anything but platitudes come from a pre-game press conference? I haven't.
3) As for the silver bullet strategy of the way you are "doing things over there" (don't know where "there" is, no problem if you'd rather not say), this is what reporters did with Harbaugh through his early tenure as coach. He just reiterated "I'm still not going to answer that [beyond platitudes]" over and over again. It was a good old fashioned standoff. At this point it's basically just a joke.
theENGLISHseahawk":1vezwmt6 said:
You've completely missed the point.
If I was sat in that press conference, I would've done anything to keep Boone talking about that particular subject. It's a dynamite quote. A complete gift to the media. He says he'd punch Matthews, then the press conference just ends. WTF? Not even one person wanted to follow that up to see what else he might say?
Two quickies:
1) The press conference doesn't just end. IIRC this was the first question of the press conference.
2) This is also why I brought up Browner saying he wanted to strangle Harbaugh. There was no major follow up in that either. Again, what you're claiming is a particularity of Bay Area sports journalsim doesn't really seem to stand up to any scrutiny, IMO.
theENGLISHseahawk":1vezwmt6 said:
My criticism throughout this thread has been against the San Fran media. Not your team. Not my team. The San Fran media.
Understood.
theENGLISHseahawk":1vezwmt6 said:
I'm still confused why you're talking about other things. Maybe the beat down actually dealt you a concussion through the TV screen?
For it not being about either of our teams, you seem to be taking a lot of silly little potshots that don't even remotely strengthen your argument. Just saying. (And no, don't worry, my head is fine

).