Power ?????

[pmedic920]

Who the heck is Matt Stein ? I'm not a bleacher report follower but does this guy have ANY credibility? He has the HAWKS @ #14 on his power rankings. I don't expect to be #1 but " come on man" # 14. WTF. Not sure how to post a link from my phone, but it's easy to find if you want to waste a few mins.

 

[Basis4day]

Stopped reading at "Bleacher Report"

 

[SoulfishHawk]

Crack Kills. #14 is beyond laughable, not that it matters.

 

[Missing_Clink]

14!?!? WHERES MY GUN

 

[Hawks46]

Somebody find the link, tweet it to the LoB, and watch the chips fly !

 

[MontanaHawk05]

If he's posting on Bleacher Report, then no, he has no credibility.

He basically just disses the Seahawks because Harvin is out. He does acknowledge that they were one of the best offenses in the league last year with a rookie Wilson and no Harvin, but still doesn't explain why he's assigning them #14.

 

[theENGLISHseahawk]

Bleacher.

Report.

 

[pmedic920]

Who the heck is Matt Stein ? I'm not a bleacher report follower but does this guy have ANY credibility? He has the HAWKS @ #14 on his power rankings. I don't expect to be #1 but " come on man" # 14. WTF. Not sure how to post a link from my phone, but it's easy to find if you want to waste a few mins.

Don't find the link. Don't ask people to check out the link. Don't promote bleacher report. Forget you ever posted this. A friendly mod will be along to delete this thread momentarily. Please enjoy a complimentary beverage while you wait.

I ran straight to my supply of cold beer after reading it. I couldn't help it, was a natural reaction.

 

[ClumsyLurk]

Probably a hawk fan that prefers being the underdog. He could be in this very thread O.O

 

[dontbelikethat]

Don't find the link. Don't ask people to check out the link. Don't promote bleacher report. Forget you ever posted this. A friendly mod will be along to delete this thread momentarily. Please enjoy a complimentary beverage while you wait.

 

[rideaducati]

He's a butthurt packer fan. I didn't read the article, but i'd be willing to bet he has the packers in the top two.

 

[nsport]

Hmm - had to find this mysterious ranking.... found this one instead, published yesterday. Has the Seahawks at #2.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1735 ... 20rankings

 

[Axx]

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1719 ... on/page/20


i love how people think that we need Percy when the fact of the matter is that Percy Needs us.

 

[rideaducati]

I found the Matt Stein ranking...he was ranking offenses only.

 

[Cartire]

All you need to know:

"We will do this based on where the team is right now, not based on the potential a team may have if its younger players step up."

The Packers should also have an improved running game. They spent two draft picks on Eddie Lacy and Johnathan Franklin, and both should have an instant impact this year.

All you need to know about this Author. He cant even follow his own rules when making the list.

 

[Stephen SeaHawking]

As others have noted, he was ranking OFFENSES only. #14 still seems a bit low.

 

[hawker84]

All you need to know:

"We will do this based on where the team is right now, not based on the potential a team may have if its younger players step up."

The Packers should also have an improved running game. They spent two draft picks on Eddie Lacy and Johnathan Franklin, and both should have an instant impact this year.

All you need to know about this Author. He cant even follow his own rules when making the list.

Heh heh, good one.

 

[13thMan]

FYI, those aren't "power rankings" in the traditional sense. Those are his OFFENSIVE power rankings. Yes, it is Bleacher Report so by all means, take it with a grain of salt, just like any other rankings or pundit opinions, etc. All that said, I'm not terribly offended, and I don't think his list is that far-fetched, just going through the whole thing... Seems about right to me, actually. Anyway, with this defense, a 14th ranked O is more than enough to rack up a few wins IMO... Moving along...

 

[Tech Worlds]

i stopped reading at your impossibly short non descriptive thread title.