seahawkfreak":3fr6quzl said:
SanDiego49er":3fr6quzl said:
seahawkfreak":3fr6quzl said:
SanDiego49er":3fr6quzl said:
He is at worst the 2nd best RB in this class. Only Barkley you could put ahead of him. He is no slouch of an athlete himself. He is hugely explosive, powerful, strong and stocky and massively productive. In addition he brings elite special teams ability. In fact he might even be the best one. He was way more productive than Barkley.
Thanks for your insights but the last sentence is a bit of an exaggeration.
He put up better #'s by a lot compared to Barkley. I wasn't really joking.
Barkley......1271 yards.......18 TD's.
Penny........2248 yards.......23 TD's.
2017 production.
Barkley......... 632 yards receiving...... 3 TD's
Penny........... 132 yards receiving...... 2TD's
Barkley......... 426 kick return yards...... 2 TD's.... LNG 98 yards
Penny .......... 521 kick return yards...... 2 TD's ..... LNG 100 yards
Barkley....... 2329 total yards....... 23 total TD's
Penny....... 2903 total yards......... 27 total TD's
I'd say production is pretty close especially considering Barkley played in the probably the top defensive division in the country. Just saying you were exaggerating a little.
The numbers you give me still show Penny with more production. So you want to play the level of competition game next. OK lets play.
Penny had...
~ Garbage O Line (not running behind the Penn State O Line by a long shot).
~ Noodle arm QB who can't throw (no passing threat).
~ Sub par WR's (no other threats to take the pressure off of him).
~ They began the season stacking 8 man boxes to stop Penny. Because it was all Penny. Not many other threats. They actually did ridiculous things like 9 men at the line to stop Penny. They still couldn't! He ran all over everybody.
~ He did the same thing to Stanford (Pac 12).
~ He did the same thing to Arizona State (Pac 12).
~ He did the same thing at the Senior Bowl against the supposed to be top competition in the country. They can't stop him either.
So IMO the less competition argument doesn't hold up. He did the same against top competition. You also can easily argue that having a really good O Line, functional QB, WR threats (which Penn State has lots and lots of including their star TE) helps open things up a lot for a RB.
You can further argue that NOT HAVING those advantages is a huge disadvantage for a RB. Especially if they are putting 8 and 9 man boxes up to stop him because there are no other threats. Plus he still ran all over them even with that. They could not stop him.
I'm not saying Barkley is bad BTW. I in fact like him a lot and think he is good or maybe even great. But Penny is just as good and may even have the better pro career.
I'm saying you could argue SOLIDLY that Penny had more production. Because he does.
