Odd thing I noticed in the game, re: kickoffs...

sutz

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
33,759
Reaction score
11,599
Location
Kent, WA
The Rams kicked off every time into the end zone, giving us the ball on the 35.

Did they fear our return team so much that they just conceded the touchback every time?

Did they trust their defense so much that they didn't care if they gave us decent field postition every time?

Can their kicker not dial it back to drop it in the landing zone?

Curious.
 

Torc

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 30, 2014
Messages
2,414
Reaction score
3,294
Their kick coverage sucks and our returner doesn't. Mcvay considered it lower risk to just give it to us on the 35.
 
N

NoGain

Guest
It was clearly intentional. I thought that from the beginning. They determined it was better to give us the ball on the 35 yard line rather than risk something worse.
 

Followthelegion

Well-known member
Joined
May 16, 2014
Messages
1,004
Reaction score
685
I raised this in the gameday forum before the punt return TD. I think it was a combo of not being concerned with our offense relative to the potential of Shaheed housing one
 

flv2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
2,662
Reaction score
2,206
Location
Bournemouth, UK
It's an exercise in bean-counting. Statistically there's very little difference in net starting position between having kicks returned and automatically starting on the 35-yard line. Obviously most starting positions will be between the 25-yard line and the 35-yard line. However the few long returns push the average closer to the 35-yard line. It's still a small net loss. However, injuries are still more common on kickoffs and the Rams consider the injury-free upside to be worth more than the yardage loss. More to the point the difference in 'points scored from starting position X' is negligible from the 31 to the 35. This calculation might be altered as we approach the playoffs.
 

Trackhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2025
Messages
1,729
Reaction score
1,869
It's an exercise in bean-counting. Statistically there's very little difference in net starting position between having kicks returned and automatically starting on the 35-yard line. Obviously most starting positions will be between the 25-yard line and the 35-yard line. However the few long returns push the average closer to the 35-yard line. It's still a small net loss. However, injuries are still more common on kickoffs and the Rams consider the injury-free upside to be worth more than the yardage loss. More to the point the difference in 'points scored from starting position X' is negligible from the 31 to the 35. This calculation might be altered as we approach the playoffs.

I don’t know if injuries are the primary consideration here. I suspect it’s more to do with your kicker not being good at that aspect of the game, while being better than Karty was in getting kicks through the uprights.

Until Mevis took over you were battling back and forth with the Panthers for the lead in opponent starting field position. Injuries didn’t stop you then.

When Karty was replaced, Rams opponent average starting position was at the 23.4 yard line. Panthers opponents were starting at the 22.6 yard line.

When you lost the “knuckle ball kick” that Karty specialized in, you started kicking it into the end zone.

Maybe the team analyzed it and realized the difference between starting on the 23.4 vs the 35 wasn’t worth the risk, but I think it’s just you now have a kicker that doesn’t excel at that part of the game.
 

flv2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
2,662
Reaction score
2,206
Location
Bournemouth, UK
I don’t know if injuries are the primary consideration here. I suspect it’s more to do with your kicker not being good at that aspect of the game, while being better than Karty was in getting kicks through the uprights.

Until Mevis took over you were battling back and forth with the Panthers for the lead in opponent starting field position. Injuries didn’t stop you then.

When Karty was replaced, Rams opponent average starting position was at the 23.4 yard line. Panthers opponents were starting at the 22.6 yard line.

When you lost the “knuckle ball kick” that Karty specialized in, you started kicking it into the end zone.

Maybe the team analyzed it and realized the difference between starting on the 23.4 vs the 35 wasn’t worth the risk, but I think it’s just you now have a kicker that doesn’t excel at that part of the game.
That's fair. I probably should have said the Rams don't consider it to be a good risk/reward choice when they're level or ahead. The Rams did experiment at the start of the season to see what the value with kicking was. Even with Karty we were kicking most of the balls into or through the endzone. The broader point was also that the Rams haven't signed players prioritising STs. They'd rather have the 5th best S on the roster than the 8th best S who might be a ST demon. Mevis at K certainly isn't a threat to tackle anyone and that should also play into the decision making. The Rams haven't punted away from any returners so it isn't based on fear of any specific returner.
 

flv2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 20, 2022
Messages
2,662
Reaction score
2,206
Location
Bournemouth, UK
After 15 games the Rams have 54 touchbacks on 91 kickoffs. The Seahawks have 16 touchbacks on 93 kickoffs.
 

Latest posts

Top