No respect for the road win

Chapow

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
6,146
Reaction score
2,171
What are you talking about? Power rankings?

Last I checked we are #1 in the NFC in the standings and that's the only thing that matters.
 
OP
OP
The Radish

The Radish

New member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
18,469
Reaction score
4
Location
Spokane, Wa.
Chapow":238zd2zc said:
What are you talking about? Power rankings?

Last I checked we are #1 in the NFC in the standings and that's the only thing that matters.


Perhaps you missed the link I posted?

:les:
 

Polaris

Active member
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
2,206
Reaction score
0
The only powerrating I pay any attention to (outside the actual NFL standings) is Football Outsiders DVOA because that evaluates each team's body of work on a play by play analysis for all three phases of the game. Even then I don't sweat it much. Ultimately this is the NFL not the NCAA. Style points don't matter.
 

loafoftatupu

Active member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
6,399
Reaction score
14
Location
Lake Tapps, WA
I listen to the radio and it is like they have a reason to talk and they abuse it to no end. The line played awful against a team that took it's one shot and sold out to use a defensive scheme that can't be used again. Not against the Hawks and not against any other teams.

It kept the offense off the field and kept the defense on, wore them down and it showed. Nothing more.
Rankings and respect don't translate into wins. I laugh at any opinion that associates the performance in Monday's game with future success. It was one game and they STILL won.

I just give no credence to any "ranking" because its complete BS. The NFL has a ranking system of their own, it is the only one that matters. Right now, the Hawks are the 1 seed if the playoffs started today. There isn't a clause that can change that. All this reaction to a WIN is ridiculous. Any fan thinking that things are falling apart for Seattle or that there is a weakness that gives them an advantage they are only hoping.

Opinion is just that. We are fans of a football team that is potentially 15-1. Until they actually lose, it is all just rhetoric.
 

Chapow

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
6,146
Reaction score
2,171
The Radish":f25rbrl0 said:
Chapow":f25rbrl0 said:
What are you talking about? Power rankings?

Last I checked we are #1 in the NFC in the standings and that's the only thing that matters.


Perhaps you missed the link I posted?

:les:

Very odd, I'm positive that link wasn't there when I posted.

I've noticed this before too. It's like sometimes you can see a post before it's finished being written.

Anyway, I have no issues with those rankings. We looked gawd awful against a mediocre team with a back up QB. If anything, I'm surprised we didn't drop a little more.
 
OP
OP
The Radish

The Radish

New member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
18,469
Reaction score
4
Location
Spokane, Wa.
I wasn't standing by it or anything else, merely pointing out that we have continued winning and now falling in the rankings to the point of having 2 teams with worse records than us listed ahead of us.

I think that kinds of thinking is funny.
 

twisted_steel2

Active member
Joined
Mar 4, 2007
Messages
6,850
Reaction score
1
Location
Tennessee
The Radish":2j96glfj said:
I see this morning on my Comcast home page we are now 5th behind 2 teams with less wins than us. (ninnirs & nawrlins)

I think that's funny because its one game.

:les:

http://xfinity.comcast.net/slideshow/sp ... ingsWeek8/

Yea, it's funny that we're 7-1 and keep going down in the polls or staying in the same spot... but we just keep winning.
 

plyka

New member
Joined
Oct 14, 2010
Messages
1,342
Reaction score
0
Power rankings are just weak, mostly because we watch the Hawks ten times more than anyone doing a power ranking. I heard this Pete Crisco guy talking on the air yesterday on the Wyman bob and whatever show, and the guy seemed like he had watched the Hawks for like 15 minutes. He said a week ago he had predicted exactly how to defend the Hawks and someone tried to draw a line to the game against the Rams --except his idea was to play zone, to never blitz, and don't attack or press but keep wilson contained. The Rams did the EXACT OPPOSITE and had success, yet he is using the Rams as a sort of justification for his idiotic article? Next he said that Hawks have a bad offense and cannot come from behind --over the last 1.5 years, since Wilson has been here, has there been a better team in coming from behind? He said if the Hawks fall down by 14 it's over, the radio host brought up last year's playoffs where they fell down by 14, the guy said the Redskins would have won had it not been for RG3 getting hurt, lol.

I mean, it's difficult to truly know about teams, and the rest of the country know very little regarding the Hawks.
 

Ad Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2011
Messages
3,326
Reaction score
569
If the power rankings didn't show movement, they wouldn't be worth checking. The media has to shuffle the board every week to get hits.
 

iigakusei

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
1,856
Reaction score
1
As of right now...on a neutral field I think it is fair to say that New Orleans and San Fran would be slight favourites. Can totally understand the power Rankings reflecting this.
 
OP
OP
The Radish

The Radish

New member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
18,469
Reaction score
4
Location
Spokane, Wa.
iigakusei":2jm13dki said:
As of right now...on a neutral field I think it is fair to say that New Orleans and San Fran would be slight favourites. Can totally understand the power Rankings reflecting this.

And this is good thinking on the medias part.

BUT

When do any of the teams play on a neutral field?

Who ever thought up that particular stupid statistic? lol That is how they try to dazzle us with bullshit when they don't know the real facts.

I'm all for us playing the ninnirs on a neutral field for our next meeting with them and I'll bet all of us would like that. Take away their home field advantage.

But of course the Aint's deserve to play us at our field. ( I'm being consistent like the media)

:les:
 

TwistedHusky

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,110
Reaction score
1,280
Well to be fair, STL had its chances.

The defense won that game for us, but it was also just as much a case of STL losing it as us winning. There were a lot of drops on what should have been completions, including one that would have won the game for STL.

But ifs and buts, we still won.

I think everyone is comparing us to the Falcons last year. They were a team that squeaked out some should have been losses, and they also got the benefit of an easy schedule. We have dodged quite a few bullets this year in just facing teams that seem to have key performers out constantly.

Frankly, it won't matter though. We still have to play the Saints and the 49ers. If we beat them, we can crow to the rooftops because we will become the favorite again for the NFC.

Admittedly, though, some of that is earned. We looked like crap against a crappy team with a backup QB. I don't know how much credit you think that is worth but the answer is: not much. Then again the Rams ALWAYS give us fits. So it is what it is.

5-6 years from now, when the Hawks window is closed - we are still going to remember this season and last with fondness. We will probably enjoy some of these games more in hindsight than in the moment because we are so focused on the flaws with the team that we miss just what an incredible job they did.

This is the land of the 110+ win Mariners or the 1 seed Sonics choking in the 1st round against Denver. We don't trust when a team is good. We need it to be good enough to cast out those fears. And I think there is some weird belief that we are almost karmically "owed" a transcendent team to make up for all the years of crappy football we had to endure. So when a team does not match those ridiculous expectations we start freaking out a bit. But when people start predicting wins by 40 on the road, or being the best defense in history, or going undefeated - well it is no surprise they get disappointed because no team is going be able to match a pinnacle created in delusion.

What we have is a very good team, that has a very good chance to beat any team they play - which is more than you could say about most Seahawks' teams past. Whether we are the best or not depends on the matchup. I don't see us being heads and shoulders above the better teams but I certainly think we can beat them.

But it makes no sense to feel like you should disregard the games they struggle unless you disregard the games you romped too.

If you were just a unbiased fan watching those two teams with no personal stake in the outcome, there is no way you could watch that game and feel like the Seahawks are the best team in the country. The lack of an effective line was so glaring and in a passing oriented league is so important, I just don't see how you could rate them otherwise. They are very good with a few glaring weaknesses.
 

loafoftatupu

Active member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
6,399
Reaction score
14
Location
Lake Tapps, WA
The Radish":1uwlny80 said:
I wasn't standing by it or anything else, merely pointing out that we have continued winning and now falling in the rankings to the point of having 2 teams with worse records than us listed ahead of us.

I think that kinds of thinking is funny.

That's how I saw it old timer. Just stating the comical. Does anyone REALLY believe KC is the best in the league? Pundits will say their record shows they are, but the Hawks get knocked down because of a fluke game that they WON. LOL.
 
OP
OP
The Radish

The Radish

New member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
18,469
Reaction score
4
Location
Spokane, Wa.
But ifs and buts,

That makes me chuckle. Are you old enough to remember Don Meridith saying

"If its and buts were candy and nuts we'd all have a Merry Christmas"?

That was in response to some comment from Howard Cosell using those terms.

:D
 

loafoftatupu

Active member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
6,399
Reaction score
14
Location
Lake Tapps, WA
The Radish":1zx0btd8 said:
But ifs and buts,

That makes me chuckle. Are you old enough to remember Don Meridith saying

"If its and buts were candy and nuts we'd all have a Merry Christmas"?

That was in response to some comment from Howard Cosell using those terms.

:D

Exactly... and guess what? The Hawks won't be playing any of their games on a neutral field. Most of them are going to be in Seattle. The rest are against other teams that tend to LOSE. The only one against a winning team is against SF. I am predicting a close win there. Why? Because of how the Hawks match up and an improved OLine. There is that Harvin guy. They need to be patient with that situation. He is far more important for the Niners game than the Bucs, Vikes and Falcons.
 

Hasselbeck

New member
Joined
May 2, 2009
Messages
11,397
Reaction score
4
I think the fact the team has yet to play a complete game.. start to finish.. with a 7-1 record should be a bigger indication of the capabilities of this team as opposed to looking like crap against an average Rams team.

It happens to every good team. The Saints barely skated by Tampa Bay on the road early this season. The Broncos were down 14 in the 3rd to a paltry Redskins team before waking up. The Chiefs barely got past the Browns at home.
 
Top