Whenever articles like this come out, I always wonder what these discussions were like 80 years ago. Once upon a time, in order to score a touchdown, you actually had to place the ball on the ground in the end zone (hence the name). After that, the ball had to be all the way in. "Break the plane" came later.
I wonder what people thought of 'break the plane' when that became a thing? Did people cry foul about removing the actual TOUCHING part of it? Did people accuse each other of ruining the game? Did someone shout "it's called a 'touchdown' for a reason, Forsythe!"
The game has changed dramatically in its existence. There used to be a single-point play (there still is in a few varieties of football). I'm guessing that with every alteration, there was equal uproar from fans, owners, and players alike. But once the 'weird newness' wears off, do people keep caring? Does anyone out there lament that they changed the timekeeping rules so that the clock continues running (after the ball is re-set) after you go out of bounds? That's a pretty big change, did all of you even notice the change (I know I didn't until this year)?
I guess this just doesn't seem like that big of a deal, in the long run. It feels weird and kind of ridiculous, but change often feels that way. If they pulled the trigger, would you stop watching because you don't get any more extra points? Or would you forget about it after the first year? How long until the announcers just stop talking about it all together?
Keep it or don't. Football is great for a lot of reasons, and extra points aren't one of them.